Division of Cardiac Surgery, The Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, MD, USA.
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2011 Nov;142(5):1236-45, 1245.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2011.07.019. Epub 2011 Aug 11.
Preformed anti-human leukocyte antigen antibodies have been associated with prolonged wait times and increased mortality in orthotopic heart transplantation. We used United Network for Organ Sharing data to examine panel reactive antibody titers in patients bridged to transplant with left ventricular assist devices.
This was a retrospective review of the United Network for Organ Sharing dataset for all patients bridged to orthotopic heart transplantation with a HeartMate II or HeartMate XVE (Thoratec Corp, Pleasanton, Calif) from January 2004 to December 2009. Patients were primarily stratified by device type and secondarily grouped for comparisons by high (>25%) versus low (0%) panel reactive antibody activity (class I and II). Outcomes included survival (30-day and 1-year), treated rejection in the year after orthotopic heart transplantation, and primary graft dysfunction. Cox proportional hazards regression examined 30-day and 1-year survival.
A total of 871 patients (56.1%) received the HeartMate II device, and 673 patients (43.9%) received the HeartMate XVE device. Patients with high panel reactive antibody had longer duration on the wait list (205 days [interquartile range, 81-344] vs 124 days [interquartile range, 51-270], P = .01). High panel reactive antibody class II was more common in patients with the HeartMate XVE device (51/547 [9.3%] vs 42/777 [5.4%], P < .001). When the entire cohort was examined together, there was no 30-day or 1-year survival difference based on panel reactive antibody activity. Device type did not affect post-orthotopic heart transplantation survival, and panel reactive antibody activity was not associated with worse mortality in Cox regression. Although panel reactive antibody activity did not affect rejection in the year after orthotopic heart transplantation for either device type, high panel reactive antibody class II was associated with higher rates of primary graft dysfunction for both devices (P < .05).
This is the largest modern study to examine the impact of detailed panel reactive antibody information in patients bridged to transplant. High panel reactive antibody levels do not affect drug-treated rejection episodes in the first year post-orthotopic heart transplantation; however, there is an associated higher rate of primary graft dysfunction, regardless of device type. Highly sensitized patients bridged to transplant experience excellent survival outcomes after orthotopic heart transplantation.
预先形成的抗人类白细胞抗原抗体与原位心脏移植的等待时间延长和死亡率增加有关。我们使用器官共享联合网络的数据,检查了用左心室辅助装置桥接移植的患者的面板反应性抗体滴度。
这是对器官共享联合网络数据库中 2004 年 1 月至 2009 年 12 月期间使用 HeartMate II 或 HeartMate XVE(加利福尼亚州普莱森顿的 Thoratec 公司)桥接至原位心脏移植的所有患者的回顾性研究。患者主要按装置类型分层,其次按高(>25%)与低(0%)面板反应性抗体活性(I 类和 II 类)分组进行比较。结果包括生存(30 天和 1 年)、原位心脏移植后 1 年的治疗性排斥反应以及原发性移植物功能障碍。Cox 比例风险回归分析了 30 天和 1 年的生存率。
共有 871 例患者(56.1%)接受了 HeartMate II 装置,673 例患者(43.9%)接受了 HeartMate XVE 装置。高面板反应性抗体患者的等待时间更长(205 天[四分位距,81-344] vs 124 天[四分位距,51-270],P =.01)。HeartMate XVE 装置中更常见高面板反应性抗体 II 类(51/547[9.3%] vs 42/777[5.4%],P <.001)。当整个队列一起检查时,根据面板反应性抗体活性,30 天或 1 年的生存率没有差异。装置类型不影响原位心脏移植后的生存,Cox 回归分析表明,面板反应性抗体活性与死亡率升高无关。尽管两种装置类型的面板反应性抗体活性均不影响移植后 1 年内的排斥反应,但高面板反应性抗体 II 类与两种装置的原发性移植物功能障碍发生率较高相关(P <.05)。
这是最大的现代研究,检查了在桥接移植患者中详细的面板反应性抗体信息的影响。高面板反应性抗体水平不会影响原位心脏移植后 1 年内的药物治疗排斥反应;然而,无论装置类型如何,原发性移植物功能障碍的发生率都较高。高度敏感的患者桥接移植后,原位心脏移植的生存结果非常好。