Suppr超能文献

既往人类白细胞抗原致敏和左心室辅助装置类型影响植入后人类白细胞抗原致敏程度。

Prior human leukocyte antigen-allosensitization and left ventricular assist device type affect degree of post-implantation human leukocyte antigen-allosensitization.

作者信息

Drakos Stavros G, Kfoury Abdallah G, Kotter John R, Reid Bruce B, Clayson Stephen E, Selzman Craig H, Stehlik Josef, Fisher Patrick W, Merida Mario, Eckels David D, Brunisholz Kim, Horne Benjamin D, Stoker Sandi, Li Dean Y, Renlund Dale G

机构信息

Utah Transplant Affiliated Hospitals (UTAH) Cardiac Transplant Program, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USA.

出版信息

J Heart Lung Transplant. 2009 Aug;28(8):838-42. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2009.04.031.

Abstract

Left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation before heart transplantation has been associated with formation of antibodies directed against human leukocyte antigens (HLA), often referred to as sensitization. This study investigated whether prior sensitization or LVAD type affected the degree of post-implantation sensitization. The records of consecutive HeartMate (HM) I and HM II LVAD patients were reviewed. Panel reactive antibody (PRA) was assessed before LVAD implantation and biweekly thereafter. Sensitization was defined as PRA > 10%, and high-degree sensitization was defined as PRA > 90%. An HM LVAD was implanted in 64 patients, and 11 received a HM II LVAD as a bridge to transplant. Ten HM I patients (16%) were sensitized before LVAD implantation (HM I-S), and 54 (84%) were not (HM I-Non-S). Nine HM I-S patients (90%) became highly sensitized (PRA > 90%) compared with 9 HM I-Non-S patients (16.7%; p < 0.001). The PRA remained elevated (> 90%) in 8 of the 9 (88.9%) highly sensitized HM I-S patients vs 5 of the 9 (55.6%) HM I-Non-S highly sensitized patients. The PRA levels in the rest of the HM I-S highly sensitized patients declined from 93% +/- 4% to 55% +/- 15% (p = 0.01). Among the 11 HM II patients, 1 (9%) was sensitized before LVAD implantation (PRA, 40%) and the PRA moderately increased to 80%. No other HM II patient became sensitized after implantation. Thus, 1 of 11 (9%) HM II patients became sensitized compared with 29 of 64 (45%) HM I patients (p = 0.04). Pre-sensitized patients are at higher risk for becoming and remaining highly HLA-allosensitized after LVAD implantation. The HeartMate II LVAD appears to cause less sensitization than HeartMate I.

摘要

心脏移植前植入左心室辅助装置(LVAD)与针对人类白细胞抗原(HLA)的抗体形成有关,这种情况通常被称为致敏。本研究调查了先前的致敏状态或LVAD类型是否会影响植入后的致敏程度。对连续的HeartMate(HM)I和HM II LVAD患者的记录进行了回顾。在LVAD植入前及之后每两周评估一次群体反应性抗体(PRA)。致敏被定义为PRA>10%,高度致敏被定义为PRA>90%。64例患者植入了HM LVAD,其中11例接受HM II LVAD作为移植过渡。10例HM I患者(16%)在LVAD植入前致敏(HM I-S),54例(84%)未致敏(HM I-Non-S)。9例HM I-S患者(90%)出现高度致敏(PRA>90%),而9例HM I-Non-S患者中只有9例(16.7%)出现高度致敏(p<0.001)。9例高度致敏的HM I-S患者中有8例(88.9%)PRA持续升高(>90%),而9例HM I-Non-S高度致敏患者中有5例(55.6%)PRA持续升高。其余高度致敏的HM I-S患者的PRA水平从93%±4%降至55%±15%(p=0.01)。在11例HM II患者中,1例(9%)在LVAD植入前致敏(PRA为40%),PRA中度升高至80%。其他HM II患者植入后均未致敏。因此,11例HM II患者中有1例(9%)致敏,而64例HM I患者中有29例(45%)致敏(p=0.04)。预先致敏的患者在LVAD植入后发生并维持高度HLA同种致敏的风险更高。HeartMate II LVAD似乎比HeartMate I引起的致敏更少。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

4
Alert! Does Prolonged Temporary Support Induce an Immunological Response?警示!长期临时支持会引发免疫反应吗?
JACC Case Rep. 2023 May 17;16:101877. doi: 10.1016/j.jaccas.2023.101877. eCollection 2023 Jun 21.

本文引用的文献

4
Effect of mechanical circulatory support on outcomes after heart transplantation.机械循环支持对心脏移植术后结局的影响。
J Heart Lung Transplant. 2006 Jan;25(1):22-8. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2005.07.014. Epub 2005 Nov 2.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验