• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

估算基于巴西人群的 SF-6D 值集。

Estimating the SF-6D value set for a population-based sample of Brazilians.

机构信息

Graduate Studies Program in Epidemiology, Health Technology Assessment Institute, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Brazil.

出版信息

Value Health. 2011 Jul-Aug;14(5 Suppl 1):S108-14. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2011.05.012.

DOI:10.1016/j.jval.2011.05.012
PMID:21839880
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

SF-6D is a preference-based measure of health developed to estimate utility values from the SF-36. The aim of this study was to estimate a weighting system for the SF-6D health states representing the preferences of a sample of the Southern Brazilian general population.

METHODS

A sample of 248 health states defined by the SF-6D was valued by a sample of the southern Brazilian population using the standard gamble. Mean and individual level multivariate regression models were fitted to the standard gamble valuation data to estimate preference weights for all SF-6D health states. The models were compared with those estimated in the UK study.

RESULTS

Five hundred twenty-eight participants were interviewed, but 58 (11%) were excluded for failing to value the worst state. Data from 469 subjects producing 2696 health states valuations were used in the regression analysis. In contrast to the best performing model for the UK data, the best performing model for the Brazilian data was a random effects model using only the main effects variables, highlighting the importance of adopting a country-specific algorithm to derive SF-6D health states values. Inconsistent coefficients were merged to produce the final recommended model, which has all significant coefficients and a mean absolute difference between observed and predicted standard gamble values of 0.07.

CONCLUSIONS

The results provide the first population-based value set for Brazil for SF-6D health states, making it possible to generate quality-adjusted life years for cost-utility studies using regional data. Besides, utility weights derived using the preferences of a sample from a southern Brazilian population can be derived from existing SF-36 data sets.

摘要

目的

SF-6D 是一种基于偏好的健康衡量标准,旨在从 SF-36 中估算效用值。本研究的目的是为 SF-6D 健康状态制定一个权重系统,代表南部巴西一般人群的偏好。

方法

使用标准博弈对由 SF-6D 定义的 248 个健康状态样本进行了由南部巴西人群组成的样本的价值评估。对标准博弈估值数据进行了均值和个体水平的多元回归模型拟合,以估算所有 SF-6D 健康状态的偏好权重。将这些模型与英国研究中估计的模型进行了比较。

结果

共采访了 528 名参与者,但有 58 名(11%)因未能对最差状态进行估值而被排除在外。来自 469 名产生 2696 个健康状态估值的受试者的数据用于回归分析。与英国数据最佳表现模型相反,巴西数据最佳表现模型是仅使用主要效应变量的随机效应模型,突出了采用特定于国家的算法来推导 SF-6D 健康状态值的重要性。不一致的系数被合并以生成最终推荐的模型,该模型具有所有显著的系数,并且观察到的和预测的标准博弈值之间的平均绝对差异为 0.07。

结论

结果为巴西提供了首个基于人群的 SF-6D 健康状态值集,从而可以使用区域数据生成成本效用研究的质量调整生命年。此外,可以从现有的 SF-36 数据集推导出使用来自巴西南部人群样本的偏好得出的效用权重。

相似文献

1
Estimating the SF-6D value set for a population-based sample of Brazilians.估算基于巴西人群的 SF-6D 值集。
Value Health. 2011 Jul-Aug;14(5 Suppl 1):S108-14. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2011.05.012.
2
A Portuguese value set for the SF-6D.SF-6D 葡萄牙价值集。
Value Health. 2010 Aug;13(5):624-30. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2010.00701.x. Epub 2010 Mar 10.
3
A comparison of Hong Kong and United Kingdom SF-6D health states valuations using a nonparametric Bayesian method.使用非参数贝叶斯方法对香港和英国 SF-6D 健康状态估值进行比较。
Value Health. 2014 Jun;17(4):397-405. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2014.02.011. Epub 2014 May 10.
4
Mapping the cancer-specific EORTC QLQ-C30 to the preference-based EQ-5D, SF-6D, and 15D instruments.将癌症特异性 EORTC QLQ-C30 映射到偏好加权 EQ-5D、SF-6D 和 15D 工具。
Value Health. 2009 Nov-Dec;12(8):1151-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2009.00569.x. Epub 2009 Jun 25.
5
A Comparison of UK and Brazilian SF-6D Preference Weights When Applied to a Brazilian Urban Population.英国和巴西SF-6D偏好权重应用于巴西城市人口时的比较
Value Health Reg Issues. 2019 Dec;20:21-27. doi: 10.1016/j.vhri.2018.10.009. Epub 2019 Jan 8.
6
Examining the Feasibility and Acceptability of Valuing the Arabic Version of SF-6D in a Lebanese Population.评估黎巴嫩人群中 SF-6D 阿拉伯语版本的可行性和可接受性。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Feb 6;17(3):1037. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17031037.
7
A Comparison of Japan and U.K. SF-6D Health-State Valuations Using a Non-Parametric Bayesian Method.使用非参数贝叶斯方法对日本和英国SF-6D健康状态估值的比较
Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2015 Aug;13(4):409-20. doi: 10.1007/s40258-015-0171-8.
8
Valuing SF-6D Health States Using a Discrete Choice Experiment.使用离散选择实验评估SF-6D健康状态
Med Decis Making. 2014 Aug;34(6):773-86. doi: 10.1177/0272989X13503499. Epub 2013 Sep 11.
9
Valuation of preference-based measures: can existing preference data be used to generate better estimates?基于偏好的衡量指标的评估:现有的偏好数据是否可以用来生成更好的估计值?
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2018 Jun 5;16(1):116. doi: 10.1186/s12955-018-0945-4.
10
Valuation of the SF-6D Health States Is Feasible, Acceptable, Reliable, and Valid in a Chinese Population.SF-6D健康状态评估在中国人群中是可行、可接受、可靠且有效的。
Value Health. 2008 Mar-Apr;11(2):295-303. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2007.00233.x.

引用本文的文献

1
The Short Form 6 Dimensions (SF-6D): Development and Evolution.简短健康调查问卷6维度量表(SF-6D):发展与演变
Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2025 Jan;23(1):19-33. doi: 10.1007/s40258-024-00919-8. Epub 2024 Oct 26.
2
Assessing health-related quality of life of Chinese population using CQ-11D.使用 CQ-11D 评估中国人群的健康相关生命质量。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2024 Apr 19;22(1):34. doi: 10.1186/s12955-024-02250-1.
3
Rivaroxaban versus warfarin in postoperative atrial fibrillation: Cost-effectiveness analysis in a single-center, randomized, and prospective trial.
利伐沙班与华法林用于预防术后房颤:一项单中心、随机、前瞻性试验的成本效益分析
JTCVS Open. 2023 Jun 2;15:199-210. doi: 10.1016/j.xjon.2023.05.006. eCollection 2023 Sep.
4
Relationship among health-related quality of life and global ancestry, clinical and socioeconomic factors in type 1 diabetes in an admixed Brazilian population.在一个混合人种的巴西人群中,1 型糖尿病患者的健康相关生活质量与全球祖籍、临床和社会经济因素之间的关系。
Sci Rep. 2022 Jun 30;12(1):11060. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-15138-1.
5
Development of the SF-6Dv2 health utility survey: comprehensibility and patient preference.SF - 6Dv2健康效用调查问卷的开发:可理解性与患者偏好
J Patient Rep Outcomes. 2022 May 12;6(1):47. doi: 10.1186/s41687-022-00455-w.
6
Modeling SF-6D Health Utilities: Is Bayesian Approach Appropriate?SF-6D 健康效用值建模:贝叶斯方法是否适用?
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Aug 9;18(16):8409. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18168409.
7
Interpretation of trial-based economic evaluations of musculoskeletal physical therapy interventions.解读肌肉骨骼物理治疗干预的基于试验的经济评估。
Braz J Phys Ther. 2021 Sep-Oct;25(5):514-529. doi: 10.1016/j.bjpt.2021.06.011. Epub 2021 Jul 21.
8
Properties of SF-6D when longitudinal data from 16,398 spine surgery procedures is applied to 9 national SF-6D value sets.当将来自16398例脊柱手术的纵向数据应用于9个国家的SF-6D值集时,SF-6D的属性。
Acta Orthop. 2021 Oct;92(5):532-537. doi: 10.1080/17453674.2021.1915524. Epub 2021 Apr 23.
9
Examining the Feasibility and Acceptability of Valuing the Arabic Version of SF-6D in a Lebanese Population.评估黎巴嫩人群中 SF-6D 阿拉伯语版本的可行性和可接受性。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Feb 6;17(3):1037. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17031037.
10
A hybrid modelling approach for eliciting health state preferences: the Portuguese EQ-5D-5L value set.一种用于获取健康状态偏好的混合建模方法:葡萄牙 EQ-5D-5L 值集。
Qual Life Res. 2019 Dec;28(12):3163-3175. doi: 10.1007/s11136-019-02226-5. Epub 2019 Jun 14.