• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一种用于获取健康状态偏好的混合建模方法:葡萄牙 EQ-5D-5L 值集。

A hybrid modelling approach for eliciting health state preferences: the Portuguese EQ-5D-5L value set.

机构信息

Centre for Health Studies and Research of the University of Coimbra (CEISUC), Coimbra, Portugal.

Faculty of Economics, University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal.

出版信息

Qual Life Res. 2019 Dec;28(12):3163-3175. doi: 10.1007/s11136-019-02226-5. Epub 2019 Jun 14.

DOI:10.1007/s11136-019-02226-5
PMID:31201730
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The EQ-5D is a generic preference-based quality of life measure considered useful for supporting clinical and policy decisions by providing utility values that can easily be converted into quality-adjusted life years to be integrated in cost-utility economic evaluations. Although the three-level classification system of the EuroQol questionnaire (EQ-5D-3L) is still the most popular preference-based instrument used worldwide, several studies reported a ceiling effect on this version, especially in healthy and/or young individuals. In 2009, the EuroQol Group introduced a five-level EQ-5D, which expands the descriptive system from three to five levels within the same five dimensions. For this version to be used in health economic evaluation, societal values need to be assigned to the 3125 health states generated by this instrument.

OBJECTIVES

The aims of this study were to elicit the EQ-5D-5L health state preferences from the general Portuguese population and to derive the Portuguese value set for the EQ-5D-5L.

METHODS

A representative sample of the Portuguese general population aged above 18 years was stratified by age and gender (n = 1451). Between October 2015 and July 2016, 28 interviewers carried out a series of 1-h-long computer-assisted personal interviews following the EuroQol Valuation Technology protocol. Each interview included the valuation of ten health states using the composite time trade-off (cTTO) and seven pairs of discrete choice experiments (DCEs). A standardized tool for quality control was used to assess the quality of the data as well as direct supervision and cross-examination of 10% of the global sample size. Data from both cTTO and DCE valuation tasks were modelled using a censored heteroskedastic hybrid model.

RESULTS

Interviewers complied with the quality control protocol in providing high-quality valuation data. The hybrid econometric model had consistent and significant parameters. The derived societal values for the Portuguese population ranged from - 0.603 to 1.

CONCLUSION

This study provided the Portuguese value set for the EQ-5D-5L on the basis of a hybrid econometric model using cTTO and DCE data. These results represent the preferences of the Portuguese population and are recommended to inform health decision-making in Portugal.

摘要

背景

EQ-5D 是一种通用的偏好基础生活质量衡量标准,被认为通过提供效用值(可轻松转换为质量调整生命年来纳入成本效用经济评估),对支持临床和政策决策很有用。尽管欧洲五维健康量表(EQ-5D-3L)的三级分类系统仍然是全球最流行的偏好基础工具,但有几项研究报告称该版本存在上限效应,尤其是在健康和/或年轻个体中。2009 年,欧洲五维健康量表组引入了 EQ-5D-5L,该版本在同一五个维度内将描述系统从三级扩展到五级。为了在健康经济评估中使用该版本,需要为该工具生成的 3125 种健康状态赋予社会价值。

目的

本研究旨在从葡萄牙一般人群中得出 EQ-5D-5L 健康状态偏好,并推导出葡萄牙 EQ-5D-5L 值集。

方法

按年龄和性别对 18 岁以上的葡萄牙一般人群进行分层(n=1451),并对其进行代表性抽样。2015 年 10 月至 2016 年 7 月期间,28 名访谈员根据欧洲五维健康量表估值技术方案开展了一系列持续 1 小时的计算机辅助个人访谈。每次访谈均使用综合时间权衡法(cTTO)和七个离散选择实验(DCE)对 10 种健康状态进行估值。使用标准化质量控制工具评估数据质量,并对全球样本量的 10%进行直接监督和交叉检查。cTTO 和 DCE 估值任务的数据均使用有偏异方差混合模型进行建模。

结果

访谈员在提供高质量估值数据方面符合质量控制方案。混合计量经济学模型的参数具有一致性和显著性。基于 cTTO 和 DCE 数据的混合计量经济学模型推导出的葡萄牙人群社会价值范围为-0.603 至 1。

结论

本研究基于使用 cTTO 和 DCE 数据的混合计量经济学模型,提供了葡萄牙 EQ-5D-5L 值集。这些结果代表了葡萄牙人群的偏好,建议用于葡萄牙的卫生决策。

相似文献

1
A hybrid modelling approach for eliciting health state preferences: the Portuguese EQ-5D-5L value set.一种用于获取健康状态偏好的混合建模方法:葡萄牙 EQ-5D-5L 值集。
Qual Life Res. 2019 Dec;28(12):3163-3175. doi: 10.1007/s11136-019-02226-5. Epub 2019 Jun 14.
2
United States Valuation of EQ-5D-5L Health States Using an International Protocol.美国使用国际协议对 EQ-5D-5L 健康状态进行评估。
Value Health. 2019 Aug;22(8):931-941. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2019.02.009. Epub 2019 May 25.
3
Dutch Tariff for the Five-Level Version of EQ-5D.EQ-5D五级版本的荷兰关税。
Value Health. 2016 Jun;19(4):343-52. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2016.01.003. Epub 2016 Mar 30.
4
Comparison of Value Set Based on DCE and/or TTO Data: Scoring for EQ-5D-5L Health States in Japan.基于DCE和/或TTO数据的价值集比较:日本EQ-5D-5L健康状态评分
Value Health. 2016 Jul-Aug;19(5):648-54. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2016.03.1834. Epub 2016 Apr 26.
5
The EQ-5D-5L Valuation study in Thailand.泰国的EQ-5D-5L估值研究。
Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2018 Oct;18(5):551-558. doi: 10.1080/14737167.2018.1494574. Epub 2018 Jul 6.
6
Parallel Valuation: A Direct Comparison of EQ-5D-3L and EQ-5D-5L Societal Value Sets.平行评估:EQ-5D-3L 和 EQ-5D-5L 社会价值集的直接比较。
Med Decis Making. 2018 Nov;38(8):968-982. doi: 10.1177/0272989X18802797.
7
The EQ-5D-5L Valuation Study in Egypt.埃及 EQ-5D-5L 估值研究。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2022 Apr;40(4):433-447. doi: 10.1007/s40273-021-01100-y. Epub 2021 Nov 17.
8
Valuation of the EQ-5D-3L in Russia.俄罗斯EQ-5D-3L量表的估值
Qual Life Res. 2021 Jul;30(7):1997-2007. doi: 10.1007/s11136-021-02804-6. Epub 2021 Mar 13.
9
Valuation of the EQ-5D-5L with composite time trade-off for the German population - an exploratory study.针对德国人群采用综合时间权衡法对EQ-5D-5L进行估值——一项探索性研究。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2017 Feb 20;15(1):39. doi: 10.1186/s12955-017-0617-9.
10
Valuation of EQ-5D-5L in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia: A National Representative Study.沙特阿拉伯王国 EQ-5D-5L 的评估:一项全国代表性研究。
Value Health. 2024 May;27(5):552-561. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2024.01.017. Epub 2024 Feb 9.

引用本文的文献

1
Objective measurement of physical activity levels and patient-reported outcomes in cancer patients receiving immune-checkpoint inhibitors: a cross-sectional study.接受免疫检查点抑制剂治疗的癌症患者身体活动水平和患者报告结局的客观测量:一项横断面研究。
Support Care Cancer. 2025 Aug 18;33(9):795. doi: 10.1007/s00520-025-09824-9.
2
Economic evaluation of non-pharmacological interventions in Alzheimer's disease.阿尔茨海默病非药物干预措施的经济学评估
Dement Neuropsychol. 2025 Jun 2;19:e20240219. doi: 10.1590/1980-5764-DN-2024-0219. eCollection 2025.
3
Validation of the Portuguese Version of IBD-Control Questionnaire and Comparison with IBD-Disk.

本文引用的文献

1
Effect of Health State Sampling Methods on Model Predictions of EQ-5D-5L Values: Small Designs Can Suffice.健康状态抽样方法对 EQ-5D-5L 价值模型预测的影响:小样本设计即可满足要求。
Value Health. 2019 Jan;22(1):38-44. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2018.06.015. Epub 2018 Jul 31.
2
Overview, Update, and Lessons Learned From the International EQ-5D-5L Valuation Work: Version 2 of the EQ-5D-5L Valuation Protocol.概述、更新以及从国际 EQ-5D-5L 估值工作中吸取的经验教训:EQ-5D-5L 估值议定书第 2 版。
Value Health. 2019 Jan;22(1):23-30. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2018.05.010. Epub 2019 Jan 2.
3
Utility Values for Health States in Ireland: A Value Set for the EQ-5D-5L.
葡萄牙语版炎症性肠病控制问卷的验证及与炎症性肠病诊断盘的比较。
GE Port J Gastroenterol. 2024 Oct 2;32(3):185-196. doi: 10.1159/000541219. eCollection 2025 Jun.
4
A Head-On Comparison of EQ-VT- and Crosswalk-Based EQ-5D-5L Value Sets.基于EQ-VT和人行横道法的EQ-5D-5L值集的直接比较。
Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2025 Mar 11. doi: 10.1007/s40258-025-00954-z.
5
Health-related quality of life after rehabilitation from knee surgery in rural and urban settings: a quasi-experimental study.农村和城市地区膝关节手术后康复的健康相关生活质量:一项准实验研究。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2024 Dec 19;25(1):1027. doi: 10.1186/s12891-024-08143-0.
6
In varietate concordia - cluster analysis of EQ-5D-5L value sets in European Union countries.欧盟国家EQ-5D-5L值集的聚类分析——多样性中的一致性
Qual Life Res. 2025 Apr;34(4):1091-1102. doi: 10.1007/s11136-024-03872-0. Epub 2024 Dec 12.
7
EQ-5D-5L value set for Norway: a hybrid model using cTTO and DCE data.挪威的EQ-5D-5L价值集:一种使用条件价值法和离散选择实验数据的混合模型。
Qual Life Res. 2025 Feb;34(2):417-427. doi: 10.1007/s11136-024-03837-3. Epub 2024 Nov 20.
8
Psychological, Social, and Economic Burden of COVID-19: A Comparison of Polish and Portuguese Young Adults.新冠疫情对波兰和葡萄牙青年成年人造成的心理、社会和经济负担比较。
Port J Public Health. 2023 May 23;41(1):34-44. doi: 10.1159/000530673. eCollection 2023 May.
9
MyBack - effectiveness and implementation of a behavior change informed exercise programme to prevent low back pain recurrences: a hybrid effectiveness-implementation randomized controlled study protocol.“MyBack”- 一项基于行为改变的运动方案预防腰痛复发的效果和实施:一项混合有效性-实施的随机对照研究方案。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2024 Jun 5;25(1):440. doi: 10.1186/s12891-024-07542-7.
10
Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a collaborative deprescribing intervention of proton-pump-inhibitors on community-dwelling older adults: Protocol for the C-SENIoR, a pragmatic non-randomized controlled trial.质子泵抑制剂协同药物精简干预对社区居住老年人的效果和成本效益:C-SENIoR 研究方案,一项实用非随机对照试验。
PLoS One. 2024 Mar 26;19(3):e0298181. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0298181. eCollection 2024.
爱尔兰健康状态的实用值:EQ-5D-5L 价值体系。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2018 Nov;36(11):1345-1353. doi: 10.1007/s40273-018-0690-x.
4
Handling Data Quality Issues to Estimate the Spanish EQ-5D-5L Value Set Using a Hybrid Interval Regression Approach.使用混合区间回归方法处理数据质量问题,以估算西班牙 EQ-5D-5L 值集。
Value Health. 2018 May;21(5):596-604. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2017.10.023. Epub 2017 Dec 2.
5
German Value Set for the EQ-5D-5L.德国 EQ-5D-5L 价值集。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2018 Jun;36(6):663-674. doi: 10.1007/s40273-018-0615-8.
6
Assessing the Use of a Feedback Module to Model EQ-5D-5L Health States Values in Hong Kong.评估反馈模块在香港模拟 EQ-5D-5L 健康状态值的应用。
Patient. 2018 Apr;11(2):235-247. doi: 10.1007/s40271-017-0278-0.
7
The Indonesian EQ-5D-5L Value Set.印度尼西亚 EQ-5D-5L 值集。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2017 Nov;35(11):1153-1165. doi: 10.1007/s40273-017-0538-9.
8
Quality Control Process for EQ-5D-5L Valuation Studies.EQ-5D-5L 估值研究的质量控制流程
Value Health. 2017 Mar;20(3):466-473. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2016.10.012. Epub 2016 Dec 22.
9
Comparing the performance of the EQ-5D-3L and the EQ-5D-5L in young Portuguese adults.比较葡萄牙年轻成年人中EQ-5D-3L和EQ-5D-5L的性能。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2016 Jun 8;14:89. doi: 10.1186/s12955-016-0491-x.
10
EuroQol Protocols for Time Trade-Off Valuation of Health Outcomes.欧洲五维度健康量表健康结果时间权衡估值协议
Pharmacoeconomics. 2016 Oct;34(10):993-1004. doi: 10.1007/s40273-016-0404-1.