Division of Cardiovascular Surgery, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104, USA.
Ann Thorac Surg. 2011 Dec;92(6):2054-60; discussion 2060-1. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2011.02.020. Epub 2011 Aug 12.
We present a comparison of porcine bioroot and composite mechanical root replacement in a large series of patients younger than 60 years who required full root replacement for true root pathology.
Between 1997 and 2007, we performed 986 aortic root replacement procedures, including 391 porcine bioroots and 515 composite mechanical roots for true root indications. Of these, 504 patients were younger than 60 years old at time of the operation. Porcine bioroots were placed in 138 patients, including 38 St. Jude Toronto Root (St. Jude Inc, St. Paul, MN), 98 Medtronic Freestyle (Medtronic Inc, Minneapolis, MN), and 2 Edwards Prima (Edwards Lifesciences Inc, Irvine, CA). Standard univariate, logistic regression, Cox regression, and propensity matching techniques were used.
To adjust for baseline differences in risk factor profiles, propensity matching yielded a final matched data set of 128 matched pairs, with no differences in preoperative risk factor profile or indication for operation. Overall 30-day operative mortality was 2.3% for porcine bioroot patients vs 1.6% for mechanical root patients (p = 0.6). Root type did not influence early (odds ratio, 0.8; 96% confidence interval, 0.2 to 3.2) or late mortality (hazard risk, 1.4; 95% confidence interval, 0 0.5 to 3.8). Multivariate predictors of late mortality included (hazard ratio, 95% confidence interval) age in years (1.01; 1.01 to 1.03), chronic renal failure (3.6; 1.1 to 12.6), and preoperative bacterial endocarditis (3.6; 1.1 to 11.8). Freedom from reoperation was similar between groups; however, bleeding events were more common among mechanical root patients.
Porcine bioroots provide durable midterm to late-term outcomes after aortic root replacement for true root indications and are an appealing alternative in younger patients because they limit morbidity associated with anticoagulant-related bleeding.
我们比较了猪生物根和复合机械根置换在一大组年龄小于 60 岁的患者中的应用,这些患者因真性根病变需要进行全根置换。
1997 年至 2007 年,我们进行了 986 例主动脉根部置换术,其中真性根部适应证使用猪生物根 391 例,复合机械根 515 例。其中 504 例患者在手术时年龄小于 60 岁。猪生物根植入 138 例患者,包括 38 例圣犹达多伦多根(圣犹达公司,明尼苏达州圣保罗),98 例美敦力 Freestyle(美敦力公司,明尼苏达州明尼阿波利斯)和 2 例爱德华兹普莱玛(爱德华兹生命科学公司,加利福尼亚州欧文)。采用单变量、逻辑回归、Cox 回归和倾向匹配技术。
为了调整风险因素谱的基线差异,倾向匹配得到了最终的匹配数据集,共有 128 对匹配对,手术前的风险因素谱或手术适应证无差异。猪生物根组 30 天手术死亡率为 2.3%,机械根组为 1.6%(p=0.6)。根类型不影响早期(比值比,96%置信区间,0.2 至 3.2)或晚期死亡率(风险比,95%置信区间,0.5 至 3.8)。晚期死亡率的多变量预测因素包括年龄(每增加 1 岁,1.01;1.01 至 1.03)、慢性肾衰竭(3.6;1.1 至 12.6)和术前细菌性心内膜炎(3.6;1.1 至 11.8)。两组间再次手术的无复发率相似,但机械根组出血事件更常见。
对于真性根部适应证的主动脉根部置换,猪生物根提供了持久的中期至晚期结果,并且在年轻患者中是一种有吸引力的选择,因为它们可以减少与抗凝相关出血相关的发病率。