Department of Developmental and Clinical Psychology, Tilburg, The Netherlands.
Res Dev Disabil. 2011 Nov-Dec;32(6):2408-14. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2011.07.019. Epub 2011 Aug 15.
It is common to use questionnaires and interviews to assess the emotions of staff who serve clients with intellectual disabilities. Remarkably, observations of actual staff behaviour and assessments of nonverbal expressions are usually not involved. In the present study, we have made a first start in the development of an observation instrument that registers both verbal and nonverbal expressions of emotion. Following extensive literature reviews, interviews with clinical experts and pilot observations, we have created an observation system and observed a team of staff members during a period of three months. Results revealed sufficient to good interrater reliabilities regarding the observation of the three forms of emotional expression: body movement, facial expression, and verbal utterances. Low levels of explained variances between the different forms of expression showed that predictive values were weak. This means that there is a surplue value of the observation of nonverbal emotional expressions as compared to existing instruments that base their assessment on verbal and/or written responses only.
使用问卷和访谈来评估为智障客户提供服务的员工的情绪是很常见的。值得注意的是,通常不涉及对实际员工行为的观察和对非言语表达的评估。在本研究中,我们首次开发了一种观察工具,该工具可记录言语和非言语的情感表达。在广泛的文献回顾、与临床专家的访谈和试点观察之后,我们创建了一个观察系统,并在三个月的时间里观察了一组员工。结果表明,对于观察三种形式的情感表达(身体运动、面部表情和言语表达),观察者之间的信度足够高。不同形式的表达之间的解释方差水平较低表明预测值较弱。这意味着与仅基于言语和/或书面反应进行评估的现有工具相比,观察非言语情感表达具有额外的价值。