• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

努力消除多胎妊娠:魁北克的成功案例。

Working to eliminate multiple pregnancies: a success story in Québec.

机构信息

OVO Fertility, Montréal, Québec, Canada.

出版信息

Reprod Biomed Online. 2011 Oct;23(4):500-4. doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2011.05.020. Epub 2011 Jul 1.

DOI:10.1016/j.rbmo.2011.05.020
PMID:21840757
Abstract

In August 2010, the provincial government of Québec, Canada introduced funding of assisted reproduction treatment through the provincial health programme. Alongside this benefit, legislation was introduced to control assisted reproduction treatment activities in the province, including restrictions on the number of embryos that could be transferred in any one cycle. The aim of the programme was to transfer a single embryo in every cycle; multiple embryos could be transferred under suboptimal conditions but required physician justification. In the first 3 months of this programme, 1353 cycles of IVF were performed in five Québec assisted reproduction centres, with an overall clinical pregnancy rate of 32% per embryo transfer and 50% of transfers used elective single-embryo transfer (eSET). The multiple-pregnancy rate was only 3.7% per clinical pregnancy. In 2009, prior to the introduction of the programme, eSET was used in only 1.6% of embryo transfers, resulting in a multiple-pregnancy rate of 25.6%. These data demonstrate that providing provincially funded assisted reproduction treatment created an environment in which the aggressive use of eSET was not only possible, but also rapidly implemented. The result was a dramatic drop in multiple-pregnancy rates, approaching those for natural pregnancies.

摘要

2010 年 8 月,加拿大魁北克省政府通过省级卫生计划为辅助生殖治疗提供资金。除了这项福利,该省还出台了立法来控制辅助生殖治疗活动,包括限制每个周期可转移的胚胎数量。该计划的目的是在每个周期中转移一个单一的胚胎;在条件不佳的情况下可以转移多个胚胎,但需要医生的证明。在该计划实施的头 3 个月里,魁北克的五个辅助生殖中心共进行了 1353 个体外受精周期,每个胚胎转移的临床妊娠率总体为 32%,50%的转移采用了选择性单胚胎转移(eSET)。多胎妊娠率仅为每例临床妊娠 3.7%。在该计划实施之前的 2009 年,eSET 仅用于 1.6%的胚胎转移,导致多胎妊娠率为 25.6%。这些数据表明,提供省级资助的辅助生殖治疗创造了一个环境,使得积极使用 eSET 不仅成为可能,而且迅速得到实施。其结果是多胎妊娠率急剧下降,接近自然妊娠的水平。

相似文献

1
Working to eliminate multiple pregnancies: a success story in Québec.努力消除多胎妊娠:魁北克的成功案例。
Reprod Biomed Online. 2011 Oct;23(4):500-4. doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2011.05.020. Epub 2011 Jul 1.
2
Universal coverage of IVF pays off.试管婴儿全覆盖,物有所值。
Hum Reprod. 2014 Jun;29(6):1313-9. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deu067. Epub 2014 Apr 4.
3
Impact of the Spanish Fertility Society guidelines on the number of embryos to transfer.西班牙生育协会指南对移植胚胎数量的影响。
Reprod Biomed Online. 2010 Nov;21(5):667-75. doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2010.05.020. Epub 2010 Jun 16.
4
[Elective single embryo transfer in assisted reproduction].[辅助生殖中的选择性单胚胎移植]
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 2006 Nov 30;126(23):3101-2.
5
[Elective single embryo transfer in assisted reproduction].[辅助生殖中的选择性单胚胎移植]
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 2006 Nov 30;126(23):3098-100.
6
The effect of legislation on outcomes of assisted reproduction technology: lessons from the 2004 Italian law.立法对辅助生殖技术结果的影响:来自2004年意大利法律的经验教训。
Fertil Steril. 2008 Apr;89(4):854-9. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2007.04.051. Epub 2007 Aug 6.
7
Single embryo transfer in clinical practice.临床实践中的单胚胎移植
Hum Fertil (Camb). 2004 Sep;7(3):175-82. doi: 10.1080/14647270400006929.
8
Effect of the new legislation and single-embryo transfer policy in Turkey on assisted reproduction outcomes: preliminary results.新立法和土耳其单胚胎移植政策对辅助生殖结局的影响:初步结果。
Reprod Biomed Online. 2011 Feb;22(2):208-14. doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2010.10.007. Epub 2010 Oct 31.
9
The impact of legally restricted embryo transfer and reimbursement policy on cumulative delivery rate after treatment with assisted reproduction technology.法律限制的胚胎移植及报销政策对辅助生殖技术治疗后累积分娩率的影响。
Hum Reprod. 2014 Feb;29(2):267-75. doi: 10.1093/humrep/det405. Epub 2013 Nov 26.
10
Reducing multiple pregnancies after assisted reproduction treatment: Québec says 'Yes, we can!'.降低辅助生殖治疗后的多胎妊娠:魁北克省表示“我们可以做到!”
Reprod Biomed Online. 2011 Oct;23(4):407-10. doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2011.05.019. Epub 2011 Jun 30.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparisons of benefits and risks of single embryo transfer versus double embryo transfer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.单胚胎移植与双胚胎移植的利弊比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2022 Jan 27;20(1):20. doi: 10.1186/s12958-022-00899-1.
2
Diagnostic laparoscopy for unexplained subfertility: a comprehensive review.不明原因不孕的诊断性腹腔镜检查:全面综述。
JBRA Assist Reprod. 2022 Jan 17;26(1):145-152. doi: 10.5935/1518-0557.20210084.
3
Time associations between U.S. birth rates and add-Ons to IVF practice between 2005-2016.
2005-2016 年美国出生率与体外受精实践附加项目之间的时间关联。
Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2021 Jul 13;19(1):110. doi: 10.1186/s12958-021-00793-2.
4
The Effect of Additional Embryo Transfer on the Pregnancy Rate in Young Women Receiving in vitro Fertilization: A Natural Experiment Study.追加胚胎移植对接受体外受精的年轻女性妊娠率的影响:一项自然实验研究
Int J Womens Health. 2021 Apr 12;13:379-384. doi: 10.2147/IJWH.S298912. eCollection 2021.
5
Outcomes of Preimplantation Genetic Testing for Single Gene Defects in a Privately Funded Period and Publicly Funded Period: A North-American Single Center Experience.私人资助阶段和公共资助阶段单基因缺陷植入前基因检测的结果:北美单中心经验
J Reprod Infertil. 2020 Apr-Jun;21(2):107-115.
6
Blastocyst transfer for all? Higher cumulative live birth chance in a blastocyst-stage transfer policy compared to a cleavage-stage transfer policy.所有人都进行囊胚移植?与卵裂期移植策略相比,囊胚期移植策略的累积活产机会更高。
Facts Views Vis Obgyn. 2019 Jun;11(2):169-176.
7
Worldwide decline of IVF birth rates and its probable causes.全球体外受精出生率的下降及其可能原因。
Hum Reprod Open. 2019 Aug 8;2019(3):hoz017. doi: 10.1093/hropen/hoz017. eCollection 2019.
8
Impact of government health coverage for ART: The results of a 5-year experience in Quebec.政府抗逆转录病毒治疗医保覆盖的影响:魁北克省五年经验的结果
Reprod Biomed Soc Online. 2019 Mar 16;8:32-37. doi: 10.1016/j.rbms.2019.01.002. eCollection 2019 Jun.
9
Is mandating elective single embryo transfer ethically justifiable in young women?对年轻女性强制实施选择性单胚胎移植在伦理上是否合理?
Reprod Biomed Soc Online. 2016 Feb 18;1(2):81-87. doi: 10.1016/j.rbms.2016.02.001. eCollection 2015 Dec.
10
Is a Blanket Elective Single Embryo Transfer Policy Defensible?一项全面的选择性单胚胎移植政策是否合理?
Rambam Maimonides Med J. 2017 Apr 28;8(2):e0022. doi: 10.5041/RMMJ.10299.