Socio-economic inequalities in cancer incidence - the choice of deprivation measure matters.

BACKGROUND

There is a well established relationship between cancer incidence and socio-economic deprivation. The strength of this relationship may be subject to the choice of deprivation index used.

METHODS

A range of possibilities for measuring area-based deprivation in Northern Ireland are investigated. The relationship between each measure and cancer incidence is described using standardised incidence ratios and age-standardised rates fitted with a log-linear model.

RESULTS

Standardised incidence ratios for lung cancer comparing the most to the least deprived deciles were greater using an income measure (371.1, 95%CI: 355.4-386.9) than an employment measure (321.1; 95%CI: 307.9-334.2). Income, employment and education measures gave similar results for breast, prostate and colorectal cancers. Standardised incidence ratios generated for all cancers (excluding non-melanoma skin) using income deciles based upon census output areas (142.4; 95%CI: 139.6-145.1) were larger than those generated using super output areas (133.0; 95%CI: 130.3-135.7) or electoral wards (130.4; 95%CI: 127.8-133.1).

CONCLUSION

While the choice of time period for measuring area-based deprivation makes little difference to relative inequalities, smaller geographic units and income based deprivation measures can produce a stronger relationship between deprivation and cancer incidence than other measures.