• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

区域社会经济贫困与癌症风险的关联:基于德国巴伐利亚癌症登记数据的分析。

Associations between regional socioeconomic deprivation and cancer risk: Analysis of population-based Cancer Registry data from Bavaria, Germany.

机构信息

German Research Center for Environmental Health, Institute of Health Economics and Health Care Management, Neuherberg, Germany.

出版信息

Prev Med. 2011 Oct;53(4-5):328-30. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2011.07.021. Epub 2011 Aug 5.

DOI:10.1016/j.ypmed.2011.07.021
PMID:21846480
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Previous research from other countries shows a positive association between cancer risk and regional deprivation. This study explores this association for lung and colorectal cancers in Germany.

METHOD

Regional deprivation was assessed by the 'Bavarian Index of Multiple Deprivation'. Cancer data were provided by the Cancer Registry of Bavaria (2003-2006). The association between cancer risk and regional deprivation was evaluated by multilevel Poisson regression analysis.

RESULTS

Crude incidence and mortality rates (per 1000 people) in the least deprived areas were 1.46 and 0.92 for lung cancer, 2.82 and 0.69 for colorectal cancer. For lung cancer, the age-adjusted relative risk (RR) for incidence in the most deprived districts (compared with the least deprived) in men was 1.41 (95% CI: 1.28-1.54), for mortality 1.59 (95% CI: 1.40-1.80); in women, an elevated RR was seen for mortality (1.24, 95% CI: 1.06-1.46). For colorectal cancer, the RR for incidence (men: 1.31, 95% CI: 1.17-1.46; women: 1.25, 95% CI: 1.12-1.40) and mortality (men: 1.51, 95% CI: 1.28-1.80; women: 1.49, 95% CI: 1.26-1.77) was always highest in the most deprived districts.

CONCLUSION

At the district level in Bavaria, the risk for lung and colorectal cancers mostly increases with increasing regional deprivation.

摘要

目的

来自其他国家的先前研究表明,癌症风险与地区贫困之间存在正相关关系。本研究探讨了德国肺癌和结直肠癌的这种相关性。

方法

通过“巴伐利亚多维度贫困指数”评估地区贫困程度。癌症数据由巴伐利亚癌症登记处(2003-2006 年)提供。通过多水平泊松回归分析评估癌症风险与地区贫困之间的关系。

结果

在最贫困地区,肺癌的粗发病率和死亡率(每千人)分别为 1.46 和 0.92;结直肠癌分别为 2.82 和 0.69。对于男性肺癌,最贫困地区(与最贫困地区相比)的发病率调整相对风险(RR)为 1.41(95%CI:1.28-1.54),死亡率为 1.59(95%CI:1.40-1.80);女性死亡率升高,RR 为 1.24(95%CI:1.06-1.46)。对于结直肠癌,发病率的 RR(男性:1.31,95%CI:1.17-1.46;女性:1.25,95%CI:1.12-1.40)和死亡率(男性:1.51,95%CI:1.28-1.80;女性:1.49,95%CI:1.26-1.77)在最贫困地区始终最高。

结论

在巴伐利亚的地区层面上,肺癌和结直肠癌的风险大多随着地区贫困程度的增加而增加。

相似文献

1
Associations between regional socioeconomic deprivation and cancer risk: Analysis of population-based Cancer Registry data from Bavaria, Germany.区域社会经济贫困与癌症风险的关联:基于德国巴伐利亚癌症登记数据的分析。
Prev Med. 2011 Oct;53(4-5):328-30. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2011.07.021. Epub 2011 Aug 5.
2
Regional deprivation in Bavaria, Germany: linking a new deprivation score with registry data for lung and colorectal cancer.德国巴伐利亚地区的贫困状况:将新的贫困评分与肺癌和结直肠癌登记数据相关联。
Int J Public Health. 2012 Oct;57(5):827-35. doi: 10.1007/s00038-012-0342-4.
3
[Regional deprivation and mortality in Bavaria. Development of a community-based index of multiple deprivation].[巴伐利亚州的地区贫困与死亡率。基于社区的多重贫困指数的编制]
Gesundheitswesen. 2012 Jul;74(7):416-25. doi: 10.1055/s-0031-1280846. Epub 2011 Oct 21.
4
Cancer incidence in Israeli Jewish survivors of World War II.二战以色列犹太幸存者中的癌症发病率。
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2009 Nov 4;101(21):1489-500. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djp327. Epub 2009 Oct 26.
5
Effects of long-term exposure to traffic-related air pollution on respiratory and cardiovascular mortality in the Netherlands: the NLCS-AIR study.长期暴露于交通相关空气污染对荷兰呼吸道和心血管疾病死亡率的影响:荷兰长期队列空气污染研究(NLCS-AIR研究)
Res Rep Health Eff Inst. 2009 Mar(139):5-71; discussion 73-89.
6
[Regional Deprivation in Germany: Nation-wide Analysis of its Association with Mortality Using the German Index of Multiple Deprivation (GIMD)].[德国的地区贫困:使用德国多重贫困指数(GIMD)对其与死亡率的关联进行全国性分析]
Gesundheitswesen. 2016 Jan;78(1):42-8. doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1390421. Epub 2015 Feb 23.
7
[Estimating the incidence of colorectal cancer in France from a hospital discharge database, 1999-2003].[利用医院出院数据库估算1999 - 2003年法国结直肠癌的发病率]
Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique. 2009 Oct;57(5):329-36. doi: 10.1016/j.respe.2009.05.004. Epub 2009 Aug 14.
8
Epidemiology of the four major cancers in South Dakota.南达科他州四大癌症的流行病学。
S D Med. 2010;Spec No:6-14.
9
Area Deprivation and COVID-19 Incidence and Mortality in Bavaria, Germany: A Bayesian Geographical Analysis.德国巴伐利亚地区的贫困与 COVID-19 发病率和死亡率:一项贝叶斯地理分析。
Front Public Health. 2022 Jul 15;10:927658. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.927658. eCollection 2022.
10
Annual report to the nation on the status of cancer, 1975-2002, featuring population-based trends in cancer treatment.《1975 - 2002年全国癌症状况年度报告》,重点介绍基于人群的癌症治疗趋势。
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2005 Oct 5;97(19):1407-27. doi: 10.1093/jnci/dji289.

引用本文的文献

1
Cancer incidence and digital information seeking in Germany: a retrospective observational study.德国的癌症发病率与数字信息搜索:一项回顾性观察研究。
Sci Rep. 2024 May 3;14(1):10184. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-60267-4.
2
The Influence of Sex and/or Gender on the Occurrence of Colorectal Cancer in the General Population in Developed Countries: A Scoping Review.性别对发达国家普通人群结直肠癌发病的影响:一项范围综述
Int J Public Health. 2024 Apr 10;69:1606736. doi: 10.3389/ijph.2024.1606736. eCollection 2024.
3
Socioeconomic disparities in endometrial cancer survival in Germany: a survival analysis using population-based cancer registry data.
德国子宫内膜癌生存的社会经济差异:基于人群癌症登记数据的生存分析。
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2022 May;148(5):1087-1095. doi: 10.1007/s00432-021-03908-9. Epub 2022 Jan 22.
4
Predictors of Lung Cancer Risk: An Ecological Study Using Mortality and Environmental Data by Municipalities in Italy.预测肺癌风险的因素:使用意大利各城市死亡率和环境数据进行的生态学研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Feb 16;18(4):1896. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18041896.
5
Socioeconomic disparities in head and neck cancer survival in Germany: a causal mediation analysis using population-based cancer registry data.德国头颈部癌症生存的社会经济差异:基于人群癌症登记数据的因果中介分析。
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2021 May;147(5):1325-1334. doi: 10.1007/s00432-021-03537-2. Epub 2021 Feb 11.
6
Are There Disparities in Surgical Treatment for Breast Cancer Patients with Prior Physical Disability A Path Analysis.先前有身体残疾的乳腺癌患者在手术治疗上是否存在差异:一项路径分析
Breast Care (Basel). 2020 Aug;15(4):400-407. doi: 10.1159/000503777. Epub 2019 Oct 14.
7
Are there social gradients in the occurrence of lung cancer and in the survival of lung cancer patients? Findings from an observational study using German claims data of Lower Saxony.肺癌的发生以及肺癌患者的生存率是否存在社会梯度差异?一项基于下萨克森州德国索赔数据的观察性研究结果。
BMJ Open. 2020 Sep 2;10(9):e036506. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-036506.
8
Socioeconomic Inequalities in Total and Site-Specific Cancer Incidence in Germany: A Population-Based Registry Study.德国总体及特定部位癌症发病率的社会经济不平等:一项基于人群的登记研究
Front Oncol. 2018 Sep 25;8:402. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2018.00402. eCollection 2018.
9
Common variants in glucuronidation enzymes and membrane transporters as potential risk factors for colorectal cancer: a case control study.葡萄糖醛酸转移酶和膜转运体的常见变体作为结直肠癌潜在风险因素的病例对照研究。
BMC Cancer. 2017 Dec 28;17(1):901. doi: 10.1186/s12885-017-3728-0.
10
Disparities by Age, Sex, Tumor Stage, Diagnosis Path, and Area-level Socioeconomic Status in Survival Time for Major Cancers: Results from the Busan Cancer Registry.主要癌症生存时间的年龄、性别、肿瘤分期、诊断路径和地区社会经济地位差异:釜山市癌症登记处的结果。
J Korean Med Sci. 2017 Dec;32(12):1974-1983. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2017.32.12.1974.