Suppr超能文献

单一条目抑郁量表预测死亡率的实用性:GAZEL 前瞻性队列研究。

Usefulness of a single-item measure of depression to predict mortality: the GAZEL prospective cohort study.

机构信息

INSERM, U1018, Centre for research in Epidemiology and Population Health, Epidemiology of occupational and social determinants of health, F-94807, Villejuif, France.

出版信息

Eur J Public Health. 2012 Oct;22(5):643-7. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckr103. Epub 2011 Aug 11.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

It remains unknown whether short measures of depression perform as well as long measures in predicting adverse outcomes such as mortality. The present study aims to examine the predictive value of a single-item measure of depression for mortality.

METHODS

A total of 14,185 participants of the GAZEL cohort completed the 20-item Center-for-Epidemiologic-Studies-Depression (CES-D) scale in 1996. One of these items (I felt depressed) was used as a single-item measure of depression. All-cause mortality data were available until 30 September 2009, a mean follow-up period of 12.7 years with a total of 650 deaths.

RESULTS

In Cox regression model adjusted for baseline socio-demographic characteristics, a one-unit increase in the single-item score (range 0-3) was associated with a 25% higher risk of all-cause mortality (95% CI: 13-37%, P<0.001). Further adjustment for health-related behaviours and physical chronic diseases reduced this risk by 36% and 8%, respectively. After adjustment for all these variables, every one-unit increase in the single-item score predicted a 15% increased risk of death (95% CI: 5-27%, P<0.01). There is also an evidence of a dose-reponse relationship between reponse scores on the single-item measure of depression and mortality.

CONCLUSION

This study shows that a single-item measure of depression is associated with an increased risk of death. Given its simplicity and ease of administration, a very simple single-item measure of depression might be useful for identifying middle-aged adults at risk for elevated depressive symptoms in large epidemiological studies and clinical settings.

摘要

背景

目前尚不清楚短程抑郁测量在预测死亡率等不良结局方面的表现是否与长程抑郁测量一样好。本研究旨在检验单项目抑郁测量对死亡率的预测价值。

方法

GAZEL 队列的 14185 名参与者于 1996 年完成了 20 项中心流行病学研究抑郁量表(CES-D)。其中一个项目(我感到沮丧)被用作抑郁的单项目测量。全因死亡率数据可获得至 2009 年 9 月 30 日,平均随访期为 12.7 年,共发生 650 例死亡。

结果

在调整基线社会人口统计学特征的 Cox 回归模型中,单项目评分增加一个单位(范围 0-3)与全因死亡率增加 25%相关(95%CI:13-37%,P<0.001)。进一步调整健康相关行为和身体慢性疾病分别使风险降低了 36%和 8%。在调整所有这些变量后,单项目评分每增加一个单位,死亡风险增加 15%(95%CI:5-27%,P<0.01)。单项目抑郁测量的反应评分与死亡率之间也存在剂量反应关系的证据。

结论

本研究表明,单项目抑郁测量与死亡风险增加相关。鉴于其简单性和易于管理,非常简单的单项目抑郁测量可能有助于在大型流行病学研究和临床环境中识别处于高抑郁症状风险的中年成年人。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

7
Cohort profile: the GAZEL Cohort Study.队列简介:GAZEL队列研究
Int J Epidemiol. 2007 Feb;36(1):32-9. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyl247. Epub 2006 Nov 12.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验