Arroll B, Goodyear-Smith F, Kerse N, Fishman T, Gunn J
Department of General Practice and Primary Health Care, School of Population Health, University of Auckland, Private Bag 92019, Auckland, New Zealand.
BMJ. 2005 Oct 15;331(7521):884. doi: 10.1136/bmj.38607.464537.7C. Epub 2005 Sep 15.
To determine the validity of two written screening questions for depression with the addition of a question inquiring if help is needed.
Cross sectional validation study.
19 general practitioners in six clinics in New Zealand.
1025 consecutive patients receiving no psychotropic drugs.
Sensitivity, specificity, and likelihood ratios of the two screening questions, the help question, combinations of the screening and help questions, and diagnosis by general practitioners.
The help question alone had a sensitivity of 75% (95% confidence interval 60% to 85%) and a specificity of 94% (93% to 96%). The positive likelihood ratio for the help question was 13.0 (9.5 to 17.8) and the negative likelihood ratio was 0.27 (0.17 to 0.44). The likelihood ratio for patients wanting help today was 17.5 (11.8 to 31.9). The general practitioner diagnosis had a sensitivity of 79% (65% to 88%) and a specificity of 94% (92% to 95%).
Adding a question inquiring if help is needed to the two screening questions for depression improves the specificity of a general practitioner diagnosis of depression.
通过增加一个询问是否需要帮助的问题,来确定两个抑郁症书面筛查问题的有效性。
横断面验证研究。
新西兰六家诊所的19名全科医生。
1025名连续接受非精神类药物治疗的患者。
两个筛查问题、帮助问题、筛查问题与帮助问题的组合以及全科医生诊断的敏感性、特异性和似然比。
仅帮助问题的敏感性为75%(95%置信区间60%至85%),特异性为94%(93%至96%)。帮助问题的阳性似然比为13.0(9.5至17.8),阴性似然比为0.27(0.17至0.44)。今日需要帮助的患者的似然比为17.5(11.8至31.9)。全科医生诊断的敏感性为79%(65%至88%),特异性为94%(92%至95%)。
在两个抑郁症筛查问题中增加一个询问是否需要帮助的问题,可提高全科医生对抑郁症诊断的特异性。