• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

公众报告医院绩效数据的感知影响:对医院工作人员的访谈。

The perceived impact of public reporting hospital performance data: interviews with hospital staff.

机构信息

Division of Healthcare Quality Evaluation, Department of Health Services Research, Center for Quality, Patient Safety and Innovation Research, The Joint Commission, Oakbrook Terrance, IL 60181, USA.

出版信息

Int J Qual Health Care. 2011 Dec;23(6):697-704. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzr056. Epub 2011 Aug 12.

DOI:10.1093/intqhc/mzr056
PMID:21840943
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To assess perceptions about the value and impact of publicly reporting hospital performance measure data.

DESIGN

Qualitative research.

SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS

Administrators, physicians, nurses and other front-line staff from 29 randomly selected Joint Commission-accredited hospitals reporting core performance measure data.

METHODS

Structured focus-group interviews were conducted to gather hospital staff perceptions of the perceived impact of publicly reporting performance measure data.

RESULTS

Interviews revealed six common themes. Publicly reporting data: (i) led to increased involvement of leadership in performance improvement; (ii) created a sense of accountability to both internal and external customers; (iii) contributed to a heightened awareness of performance measure data throughout the hospital; (iv) influenced or re-focused organizational priorities; (v) raised concerns about data quality and (vi) led to questions about consumer understanding of performance reports. Few differences were noted in responses based on hospitals' performance on the measures.

CONCLUSIONS

Public reporting of performance measure data appears to motivate and energize organizations to improve or maintain high levels of performance. Despite commonly cited concerns over the limitations, validity and interpretability of publicly reported data, the heightened awareness of the data intensified the focus on performance improvement activities. As the healthcare industry has moved toward greater transparency and accountability, healthcare professionals have responded by re-prioritizing hospital quality improvement efforts to address newly exposed gaps in care.

摘要

目的

评估公众对医院绩效衡量数据报告的价值和影响的看法。

设计

定性研究。

地点和参与者

从随机抽取的 29 家获得联合委员会认证并报告核心绩效衡量数据的医院中选取行政人员、医生、护士和其他一线员工进行了 29 次结构化焦点小组访谈,以收集医院员工对绩效衡量数据公开报告的感知影响的看法。

方法

进行了结构化的焦点小组访谈,以收集医院工作人员对公开报告绩效衡量数据的感知影响的看法。

结果

访谈揭示了六个共同的主题。公开报告数据:(i) 导致领导层更多地参与绩效改进;(ii) 对内部和外部客户产生了责任感;(iii) 有助于提高整个医院对绩效衡量数据的认识;(iv) 影响或重新聚焦组织的优先事项;(v) 对数据质量表示担忧;(vi) 引发了对消费者对绩效报告理解的质疑。根据医院在这些衡量标准上的表现,对这些反应的差异很小。

结论

绩效衡量数据的公开报告似乎激励和激发了组织提高或保持高水平的绩效。尽管人们普遍对公开报告的数据的局限性、有效性和可解释性表示担忧,但对数据的认识提高了对绩效改进活动的关注。随着医疗保健行业向更高的透明度和问责制发展,医疗保健专业人员通过重新优先考虑医院质量改进工作来解决新出现的护理差距,对此做出了回应。

相似文献

1
The perceived impact of public reporting hospital performance data: interviews with hospital staff.公众报告医院绩效数据的感知影响:对医院工作人员的访谈。
Int J Qual Health Care. 2011 Dec;23(6):697-704. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzr056. Epub 2011 Aug 12.
2
Hospital response to public reporting of quality indicators.医院对质量指标公开报告的回应。
Health Care Financ Rev. 2007 Spring;28(3):61-76.
3
A qualitative analysis of hospital leaders' opinions about publicly reported measures of health care quality.对医院领导关于医疗质量公开报告指标的意见进行的定性分析。
Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2015 Apr;41(4):169-76. doi: 10.1016/s1553-7250(15)41022-0.
4
Promoting patient-centered care: a qualitative study of facilitators and barriers in healthcare organizations with a reputation for improving the patient experience.促进以患者为中心的护理:在以改善患者体验而闻名的医疗机构中促进和阻碍因素的定性研究。
Int J Qual Health Care. 2011 Oct;23(5):510-5. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzr024. Epub 2011 May 16.
5
Attitudes of hospital leaders toward publicly reported measures of health care quality.医院领导对公开报告的医疗质量衡量指标的态度。
JAMA Intern Med. 2014 Dec;174(12):1904-11. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2014.5161.
6
Identifying, understanding and overcoming barriers to medication error reporting in hospitals: a focus group study.识别、理解和克服医院药物错误报告障碍:一项焦点小组研究。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2012 May;21(5):361-8. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2011-000299. Epub 2012 Mar 2.
7
Public disclosure of hospital clinicians' performance data: insights from medical directors.公开医院临床医生绩效数据:医疗主任的观点
Aust Health Rev. 2020 Apr;44(2):228-233. doi: 10.1071/AH18128.
8
Can incident reporting improve safety? Healthcare practitioners' views of the effectiveness of incident reporting.事件报告能否提高安全性?医疗保健从业者对事件报告有效性的看法。
Int J Qual Health Care. 2013 Apr;25(2):141-50. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzs081. Epub 2013 Jan 18.
9
Healthcare professional perspectives on quality and safety in New Zealand public hospitals: findings from a national survey.新西兰公立医院医疗专业人员对质量与安全的看法:一项全国性调查的结果
Aust Health Rev. 2014 Feb;38(1):109-14. doi: 10.1071/AH13116.
10
Maternal and newborn healthcare providers in rural Tanzania: in-depth interviews exploring influences on motivation, performance and job satisfaction.坦桑尼亚农村地区的孕产妇和新生儿医疗保健提供者:关于探究对积极性、工作表现和工作满意度影响的深度访谈
Rural Remote Health. 2012;12:2072. Epub 2012 Aug 30.

引用本文的文献

1
Ethical and legal considerations governing use of health data for quality improvement and performance management: a scoping review of the perspectives of health professionals and administrators.关于将健康数据用于质量改进和绩效管理的伦理与法律考量:对卫生专业人员和管理人员观点的范围界定审查
BMJ Open Qual. 2025 Apr 17;14(2):e003309. doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2025-003309.
2
Australian private healthcare staff perspectives on patient reported experience measures (PREMs): a qualitative interview study.澳大利亚私立医疗机构员工对患者报告体验测量(PReMs)的看法:一项定性访谈研究。
J Patient Rep Outcomes. 2024 Nov 6;8(1):127. doi: 10.1186/s41687-024-00809-6.
3
Exploring the factors impacting choice and quality of overnight private hospital stays and consumer perspectives on patient reported experience measures (PREMs) in Australia: a qualitative interview study.
探讨影响澳大利亚患者选择和夜间私立医院住院质量的因素,以及患者对患者报告体验测量(PREMs)的看法:一项定性访谈研究。
J Patient Rep Outcomes. 2024 Jul 20;8(1):75. doi: 10.1186/s41687-024-00755-3.
4
Trust performance in managing inflammatory arthritis over time in England and Wales: a latent class analysis approach.英国和威尔士长期管理炎性关节炎的信托绩效:一种潜在类别分析方法。
Rheumatol Adv Pract. 2024 May 17;8(2):rkae053. doi: 10.1093/rap/rkae053. eCollection 2024.
5
Comparison of electronic versus manual abstraction for 2 standardized perinatal care measures.电子与手动摘要对 2 项标准化围产保健措施的比较。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2022 Apr 13;29(5):789-797. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocab276.
6
Fostering trust, collaboration, and a culture of continuous quality improvement: A call for transparency in medical school accreditation.培养信任、协作和持续质量改进的文化:呼吁医学院校认证的透明度。
Can Med Educ J. 2020 Sep 23;11(5):e102-e108. doi: 10.36834/cmej.70061. eCollection 2020 Sep.
7
Appropriateness, effectiveness and safety of care delivered in Canadian hospitals: a longitudinal assessment on the utility of publicly reported performance trend data between 2012-2013 and 2016-2017.加拿大医院提供的护理的适宜性、有效性和安全性:2012-2013 年至 2016-2017 年期间公开报告的绩效趋势数据在实用性方面的纵向评估。
BMJ Open. 2020 Jun 16;10(6):e035447. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-035447.
8
A systematic review and meta-synthesis of policy intervention characteristics that influence the implementation of government-directed policy in the hospital setting: implications for infection prevention and control.对影响医院环境中政府主导政策实施的政策干预特征进行的系统评价与综合分析:对感染预防与控制的启示
J Infect Prev. 2020 May;21(3):84-96. doi: 10.1177/1757177420907696. Epub 2020 May 4.
9
Ranking hospitals when performance and risk factors are correlated: A simulation-based comparison of risk adjustment approaches for binary outcomes.当绩效和风险因素相关时对医院进行排名:基于模拟的二分类结局风险调整方法比较。
PLoS One. 2019 Dec 4;14(12):e0225844. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0225844. eCollection 2019.
10
Facts and Fears in Public Reporting: Patients' Information Needs and Priorities When Selecting a Hospital for Cancer Care.公众报告中的事实与担忧:患者在选择癌症治疗医院时的信息需求和优先事项。
Med Decis Making. 2019 Aug;39(6):632-641. doi: 10.1177/0272989X19855050. Epub 2019 Jun 21.