Suppr超能文献

贝伐珠单抗治疗期间进展的胶质母细胞瘤患者的神经外科治疗和预后。

Neurosurgical management and prognosis of patients with glioblastoma that progresses during bevacizumab treatment.

机构信息

Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California 94143-0112, USA.

出版信息

Neurosurgery. 2012 Feb;70(2):361-70. doi: 10.1227/NEU.0b013e3182314f9d.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The management and prognosis of glioblastoma patients after Stupp protocol treatment and progression during bevacizumab (BV) treatment remain undefined.

OBJECTIVE

We compared the morbidity and survival of patients whose glioblastomas progressed during BV treatment requiring craniotomy with those of patients not treated with BV.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed patients who underwent craniotomy for recurrent glioblastoma from 2005 to 2009. Patients operated on for progression during BV (preoperative BV) were compared with patients receiving no BV or receiving BV after surgery (postoperative BV). Patients receiving BV preoperatively were compared with those patients whose gliobastoma progressed on BV treatment but were not operated on (no surgery).

RESULTS

There were 23 preoperative BV patients, 135 no BV patients, 16 postoperative BV patients, and 25 no surgery patients. Patients receiving BV preoperatively had a worse postoperative overall survival rate (hazard ratio, 3.1; P < .001) and worse postoperative progression-free survival rate (hazard ratio, 3.4, P < .001) than patients not receiving BV. Patients receiving BV preoperatively had a higher perioperative morbidity rate (44%) than patients not receiving preoperative BV (21%) (P = 0.02). Survival after diagnosis was comparable between groups (86-93 weeks, P = .9), consistent with glioblastomas developing BV evasion being not intrinsically more aggressive, but possibly BV evasion conferring a uniquely poor prognosis. No surgery patients had a shorter overall survival after progression during BV treatment compared with preoperative BV patients (hazard ratio, 3.6, P < .001).

CONCLUSION

Patients whose glioblastomas progress while receiving BV leading to craniotomy exhibit shorter postoperative survival and more perioperative morbidity than patients not treated with BV. Although there may be benefits to surgical debulking, the decision to pursue repeat surgery in patients in whom BV treatment failed must be balanced against the increased risk of perioperative complications.

摘要

背景

在接受 Stupp 方案治疗后和贝伐珠单抗(BV)治疗期间进展的胶质母细胞瘤患者的管理和预后仍未确定。

目的

我们比较了在接受贝伐珠单抗治疗期间因进展而行开颅术的患者与未接受贝伐珠单抗治疗的患者的发病率和生存率。

方法

我们回顾性分析了 2005 年至 2009 年因复发性胶质母细胞瘤而行开颅术的患者。对在贝伐珠单抗治疗期间进展而行手术的患者(术前贝伐珠单抗)与未接受贝伐珠单抗或术后接受贝伐珠单抗的患者(术后贝伐珠单抗)进行比较。将术前接受贝伐珠单抗治疗的患者与那些在贝伐珠单抗治疗期间进展但未行手术的患者(未手术)进行比较。

结果

术前接受贝伐珠单抗治疗的患者有 23 例,未接受贝伐珠单抗治疗的患者有 135 例,术后接受贝伐珠单抗治疗的患者有 16 例,未手术的患者有 25 例。术前接受贝伐珠单抗治疗的患者术后总生存率(风险比,3.1;P<0.001)和术后无进展生存率(风险比,3.4,P<0.001)均较差,与未接受贝伐珠单抗治疗的患者相比。术前接受贝伐珠单抗治疗的患者围手术期发病率较高(44%),明显高于未接受术前贝伐珠单抗治疗的患者(21%)(P=0.02)。在诊断后的生存时间方面,各组之间无差异(86-93 周,P=0.9),这与胶质母细胞瘤对贝伐珠单抗产生耐药性并不具有更高侵袭性一致,而可能是对贝伐珠单抗的耐药性导致了较差的预后。与术前接受贝伐珠单抗治疗的患者相比,在接受贝伐珠单抗治疗期间进展的未手术患者的总生存期更短(风险比,3.6,P<0.001)。

结论

在接受贝伐珠单抗治疗期间进展而行开颅术的患者术后生存率较低,围手术期发病率较高,与未接受贝伐珠单抗治疗的患者相比。尽管手术切除可能有益,但在贝伐珠单抗治疗失败的患者中是否再次进行手术的决定必须与围手术期并发症的增加风险相平衡。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验