• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

低渗透性戈尔封堵器与原版封堵器在腹主动脉瘤尺寸缩小方面的对比

Low-permeability Gore Excluder device versus the original in abdominal aortic aneurysm size regression.

作者信息

Krajcer Zvonimir, Rajan Lawrence, Thota Venkata, Dougherty Kathryn G, Strickman Neil E, Mortazavi Ali, Cheong Benjamin Y C

机构信息

Division of Cardiology, Texas Heart Institute at St. Luke's Episcopal Hospital, TXx 77030, USA.

出版信息

Tex Heart Inst J. 2011;38(4):381-5.

PMID:21841865
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3147216/
Abstract

We sought to compare the efficacy of a low-permeability version of the Gore Excluder™ device with that of the original device. We used volumetric analysis and maximum transverse diameter measurements to examine abdominal aortic aneurysm size regression after endovascular aneurysm repair.From November 2002 through April 2007, 101 patients (82% men; mean age, 71.5 ± 8.9 yr) underwent endovascular aneurysm repair with the Excluder stent-graft: 34 with the original device, and 67 with the low-permeability device. Only patients without endoleak and with preprocedural and 1- and 2-year follow-up computed tomographic scans were included. Eight patients with type II endoleak and 2 with type I endoleak were excluded. Maximum abdominal aortic aneurysm diameter and volume were measured before endovascular aneurysm repair and annually thereafter. Postprocessing, multiplanar computed tomography, and 3-dimensional reconstructions were compared with baseline measurements. Diameter and volume changes that were greater than 5 mm or that exceeded 10% were considered significant.At 12 months, the mean maximum transverse diameter had decreased by -0.16 ± 12.1 mm in recipients of the original device and by -4.8 ± 5.9 mm in recipients of the low-permeability device (P = NS). In addition, mean reduction in volume had changed by -17 ± 16 mL in original-device recipients and by -36.1 ± 37.9 mL in low-permeability device recipients (P < 0.01).One-year follow-up revealed that the low-permeability stent-graft resulted in a greater decrease in abdominal aortic aneurysm volume than did the original stent-graft.

摘要

我们试图比较低渗透率版本的戈尔覆膜支架移植物(Gore Excluder™)与原始设备的疗效。我们使用容积分析和最大横径测量来检查血管内动脉瘤修复术后腹主动脉瘤大小的变化。

从2002年11月到2007年4月,101例患者(82%为男性;平均年龄71.5±8.9岁)接受了使用Excluder覆膜支架移植物的血管内动脉瘤修复术:34例使用原始设备,67例使用低渗透率设备。仅纳入无内漏且有术前及1年和2年随访计算机断层扫描的患者。8例II型内漏患者和2例I型内漏患者被排除。在血管内动脉瘤修复术前及此后每年测量腹主动脉瘤的最大直径和体积。将后处理、多平面计算机断层扫描和三维重建与基线测量进行比较。直径和体积变化大于5mm或超过10%被认为具有显著性。

在12个月时,原始设备接受者的平均最大横径减少了-0.16±12.1mm,低渗透率设备接受者的平均最大横径减少了-4.8±5.9mm(P=无显著性差异)。此外,原始设备接受者的平均体积减少了-17±16mL,低渗透率设备接受者的平均体积减少了-36.1±37.9mL(P<0.01)。

一年的随访显示,低渗透率覆膜支架移植物导致腹主动脉瘤体积的减少比原始覆膜支架移植物更大。

相似文献

1
Low-permeability Gore Excluder device versus the original in abdominal aortic aneurysm size regression.低渗透性戈尔封堵器与原版封堵器在腹主动脉瘤尺寸缩小方面的对比
Tex Heart Inst J. 2011;38(4):381-5.
2
Long-term sac behavior after endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair with the Excluder low-permeability endoprosthesis.采用 Excluder 低渗透性覆膜支架行腹主动脉瘤腔内修复术后的长期覆膜内漏。
J Vasc Surg. 2011 May;53(5):1178-83. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2010.11.045. Epub 2011 Jan 26.
3
Sac behavior after aneurysm treatment with the Gore Excluder low-permeability aortic endoprosthesis: 12-month comparison to the original Excluder device.使用戈尔低渗透率主动脉覆膜支架系统治疗动脉瘤后的瘤囊情况:与第一代戈尔覆膜支架系统的12个月对比研究
J Vasc Surg. 2006 Oct;44(4):694-700. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2006.06.018. Epub 2006 Aug 22.
4
New results with 100 Excluder cases.100例排除病例的新结果。
J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino). 2010 Aug;51(4):475-80.
5
The effect of endograft relining on sac expansion after endovascular aneurysm repair with the original-permeability Gore Excluder abdominal aortic aneurysm endoprosthesis.采用具有原始通透性的戈尔覆膜支架型人工血管行腹主动脉瘤腔内修复术后,移植物内衬对瘤囊扩张的影响。
J Vasc Surg. 2007 Apr;45(4):686-93. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2006.12.025. Epub 2007 Feb 15.
6
Long-term outcomes of Palmaz stent placement for intraoperative type Ia endoleak during endovascular aneurysm repair.血管腔内动脉瘤修复术中Ia型内漏的Palmaz支架置入术的长期疗效
Ann Vasc Surg. 2011 Jan;25(1):120-6. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2010.08.004.
7
Impact of the Repositionable C3 Excluder System on the Endovascular Treatment of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms With Unfavorable Neck Anatomy.可重新定位的C3封堵器系统对颈部解剖结构不佳的腹主动脉瘤血管内治疗的影响。
J Endovasc Ther. 2016 Aug;23(4):593-8. doi: 10.1177/1526602816646550. Epub 2016 May 5.
8
Improved effectiveness of the repositionable GORE EXCLUDER AAA endoprosthesis featuring the C3 delivery system compared with the original GORE EXCLUDER AAA endoprosthesis for within the instructions for use treatment of aortoiliac aneurysms.采用 C3 输送系统的可重新定位 GORE EXCLUDER AAA 覆膜支架与原始 GORE EXCLUDER AAA 覆膜支架相比,在使用说明书规定的范围内治疗腹主动脉瘤时,具有更高的有效性。
J Vasc Surg. 2019 Feb;69(2):394-404. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2018.05.013. Epub 2018 Aug 11.
9
Influence of different self-expanding stent-graft types on remodeling of the aortic neck after endovascular aneurysm repair.不同自膨式覆膜支架类型对血管内动脉瘤修复后主动脉颈重塑的影响。
J Endovasc Ther. 2010 Dec;17(6):677-84. doi: 10.1583/10-3172.1.
10
Ten-year outcome analysis of the Italian Excluder Registry with the Gore Excluder endograft for infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysms.意大利 Excluder 注册研究中戈尔 Excluder 覆膜支架治疗肾下型腹主动脉瘤的 10 年结果分析。
J Vasc Surg. 2018 Mar;67(3):740-746. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2017.07.133. Epub 2017 Nov 2.

本文引用的文献

1
Sac behavior after aneurysm treatment with the Gore Excluder low-permeability aortic endoprosthesis: 12-month comparison to the original Excluder device.使用戈尔低渗透率主动脉覆膜支架系统治疗动脉瘤后的瘤囊情况:与第一代戈尔覆膜支架系统的12个月对比研究
J Vasc Surg. 2006 Oct;44(4):694-700. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2006.06.018. Epub 2006 Aug 22.
2
Three-dimensional analysis of enlarging aneurysms after endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair in the Gore Excluder Pivotal clinical trial.
J Vasc Surg. 2006 May;43(5):888-95. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2005.12.067.
3
Secondary conversion of the Gore Excluder to operative abdominal aortic aneurysm repair.戈尔特斯覆膜支架转为开腹腹主动脉瘤修复术的二次转换
J Vasc Surg. 2005 Oct;42(4):631-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2005.05.056.
4
A randomized trial comparing conventional and endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms.一项比较腹主动脉瘤传统修复术与血管腔内修复术的随机试验。
N Engl J Med. 2004 Oct 14;351(16):1607-18. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa042002.
5
Comparison of endovascular aneurysm repair with open repair in patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm (EVAR trial 1), 30-day operative mortality results: randomised controlled trial.腹主动脉瘤患者血管内动脉瘤修复术与开放修复术的比较(EVAR试验1),30天手术死亡率结果:随机对照试验
Lancet. 2004;364(9437):843-8. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(04)16979-1.
6
Late abdominal aortic aneurysm enlargement after endovascular repair with the Excluder device.使用Excluder装置进行血管腔内修复术后晚期腹主动脉瘤扩大
J Vasc Surg. 2004 Jun;39(6):1236-41; discussion 2141-2. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2004.02.038.
7
Management of aneurysm sac hygroma.动脉瘤囊状水瘤的管理。
J Endovasc Ther. 2004 Apr;11(2):191-5. doi: 10.1583/03-1059.1.
8
Delayed aortic aneurysm enlargement due to endotension after endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair.血管腔内腹主动脉瘤修复术后因内张力导致的主动脉瘤延迟扩大。
J Vasc Surg. 2003 Oct;38(4):840-2. doi: 10.1016/s0741-5214(03)00468-3.
9
Secondary conversion due to failed endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair.因血管腔内腹主动脉瘤修复失败导致的二次转换。
J Vasc Surg. 2003 Sep;38(3):473-7; discussion 477-8. doi: 10.1016/s0741-5214(03)00417-8.
10
A multicenter controlled clinical trial of open versus endovascular treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysm.一项关于腹主动脉瘤开放手术与血管内治疗的多中心对照临床试验。
J Vasc Surg. 2003 Feb;37(2):262-71. doi: 10.1067/mva.2003.120.