Oliveira Luciana Butini, Zardetto Cristina Giovanetti, Rocha Rachel de, Rodrigues Célia Regina, Wanderley Marcia Turolla
School of Dentistry, Faculdade Sao Leopoldo Mandic, Ponte Preta, Campinas, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
Oral Health Prev Dent. 2011;9(2):137-41.
The objectives of this study were 1) to compare the efficacy of biofilm removal with conventional (Bitufo 22) and triple-headed (DenTrust) toothbrushes on smooth and occlusal surfaces, and 2) to verify the influence of the person who performs the toothbrushing (mother vs dentist).
Twenty children aged 4 years old with sound, complete primary dentition participated in this crossover study. The quantity of biofilm was evaluated using the bacterial plaque revealer Plaque Test (Vivadent) before and after toothbrushing by the mother or dentist for 1 minute per arch. This was done at two separate appointments, one week apart, with one type of toothbrush at the first and the other type at the second appointment. The Green & Vermillion index (1960) was used for smooth surfaces and Rodrigues et al (1999) indexes for the occlusal surfaces. Data were submitted to analysis of variance.
A statistically significant difference was observed on biofilm removal on occlusal and smooth surfaces, regardless of the toothbrush used or who performed the brushing (P < 0.0001). The triple-headed toothbrush showed a better performance than the conventional one on smooth and occlusal surfaces when the mother had brushed the teeth. The conventional toothbrush showed a better performance only on occlusal surfaces when the dentist performed the brushing (P < 0.0001). The dentist removed significantly more biofilm than the mother, 76% and 53%, respectively (P < 0.0001).
It was concluded that effective biofilm removal was achieved with both toothbrushes; however, the tripleheaded type had a better performance on surfaces when the mother brushed the teeth. The dentist removed more biofilm than the mother.
本研究的目的是:1)比较传统(Bitufo 22)牙刷和三头(DenTrust)牙刷在光滑面和咬合面上清除生物膜的效果;2)验证刷牙者(母亲与牙医)的影响。
20名4岁、乳牙健全且完整的儿童参与了这项交叉研究。在母亲或牙医每侧牙弓刷牙1分钟前后,使用细菌菌斑显示剂菌斑测试(Vivadent)评估生物膜的量。这在两次单独的预约中进行,间隔一周,第一次预约使用一种类型的牙刷,第二次预约使用另一种类型的牙刷。光滑面使用格林和朱红指数(1960年),咬合面使用罗德里格斯等人(1999年)的指数。数据进行方差分析。
无论使用何种牙刷或由谁刷牙,在咬合面和光滑面上清除生物膜均观察到统计学上的显著差异(P < 0.0001)。当母亲刷牙时,三头牙刷在光滑面和咬合面上的表现优于传统牙刷。当牙医刷牙时,传统牙刷仅在咬合面上表现更好(P < 0.0001)。牙医清除的生物膜明显多于母亲,分别为76%和53%(P < 0.0001)。
得出的结论是,两种牙刷都能有效清除生物膜;然而,当母亲刷牙时,三头牙刷在牙面上的表现更好。牙医清除的生物膜比母亲更多。