• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

骨结合种植体印模技术的评估

An evaluation of impression techniques for osseointegrated implants.

作者信息

Spector M R, Donovan T E, Nicholls J I

机构信息

University of Southern California, School of Dentistry, Los Angeles.

出版信息

J Prosthet Dent. 1990 Apr;63(4):444-7. doi: 10.1016/0022-3913(90)90235-5.

DOI:10.1016/0022-3913(90)90235-5
PMID:2184229
Abstract

A passive fit between osseointegrated implants and the prosthesis they will support has been advocated. An experimental model was developed to test the accuracy of three impression techniques and the components used to make the transfer records. Statistically, no significant difference was found between the three methods tested. From this initial study, it appears that further work is needed to isolate techniques that will predictably provide accurate registration of the position of endosseous implants.

摘要

有人主张骨结合种植体与其所支持的假体之间应采用被动适配。开发了一种实验模型来测试三种印模技术以及用于制作转移记录的部件的准确性。从统计学角度来看,所测试的三种方法之间未发现显著差异。从这项初步研究来看,似乎需要进一步开展工作,以分离出能够可预测地提供准确的骨内种植体位置记录的技术。

相似文献

1
An evaluation of impression techniques for osseointegrated implants.骨结合种植体印模技术的评估
J Prosthet Dent. 1990 Apr;63(4):444-7. doi: 10.1016/0022-3913(90)90235-5.
2
A comparison of dimensional accuracy between three different addition cured silicone impression materials.三种不同加成型硅橡胶印模材料尺寸精度的比较
Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent. 2005 Jun;13(2):69-74.
3
Evaluation of the precision of three implant transfer impression techniques using two elastomeric impression materials.三种种植体转移印模技术使用两种弹性印模材料的精度评估。
Int J Prosthodont. 2010 Nov-Dec;23(6):525-8.
4
Fabricating a stable record base for completely edentulous patients treated with osseointegrated implants using healing abutments.使用愈合基台为接受骨结合种植体治疗的全口无牙患者制作稳定的记录基台。
J Prosthet Dent. 1999 Feb;81(2):224-7. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3913(99)70253-2.
5
An alternative technique for the accurate transfer of periimplant soft tissue contour.一种精确转移种植体周围软组织轮廓的替代技术。
J Prosthet Dent. 2013 Feb;109(2):135-7. doi: 10.1016/S0022-3913(13)60031-1.
6
An implant impression technique using a plaster splinting index combined with a silicone impression.一种使用石膏夹板印模索引与硅橡胶印模相结合的种植体印模技术。
J Prosthet Dent. 2004 Dec;92(6):575-7. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2004.09.013.
7
Accuracy of different impression techniques for internal-connection implants.不同附着体种植义齿印模技术准确性的研究。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2009 Sep-Oct;24(5):823-30.
8
Accuracy of replacing three tapered transfer impression copings in two elastomeric impression materials.在两种弹性印模材料中替换三个锥形转移印模帽的准确性。
Int J Prosthodont. 1993 Jul-Aug;6(4):377-83.
9
Evaluation of accuracy of complete-arch multiple-unit abutment-level dental implant impressions using different impression and splinting materials.评价不同印模和夹板材料在全颌多单位基台水平种植体取模中的准确性。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2013 Nov-Dec;28(6):1512-20. doi: 10.11607/jomi.2958.
10
[Impression technics in implantology].
Rev Belge Med Dent (1984). 2001;56(3):189-203.

引用本文的文献

1
Alterations in internal threads of implant analog of different materials after multiple reuse.多次重复使用后不同材料种植体代型内螺纹的改变。
Bioinformation. 2024 Jun 30;20(6):695-699. doi: 10.6026/973206300200695. eCollection 2024.
2
A Comparative Study to Assess Accuracy of Casts Prepared using Direct Impression Technique with and without Splinting of Multiple Dental Implants Utilising Two Different Splinting and Impression Materials.一项对比研究,旨在评估使用直接印模技术、采用两种不同的夹板和印模材料,对多个牙种植体进行夹板固定和不进行夹板固定时所制备模型的准确性。
J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2023 Jul;15(Suppl 2):S944-S947. doi: 10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_271_23. Epub 2023 Jul 11.
3
Do digital impressions have a greater accuracy for full-arch implant-supported reconstructions compared to conventional impressions? An study.
数字化印模在全口种植义齿修复中比传统印模具有更高的准确性吗?一项 研究。
J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2022 Oct-Dec;22(4):398-404. doi: 10.4103/jips.jips_52_22.
4
Can transfer type and implant angulation affect impression accuracy? A 3D in vitro evaluation.转移类型和种植体角度会影响印模精度吗?一项 3D 体外评估。
Odontology. 2021 Oct;109(4):884-894. doi: 10.1007/s10266-021-00619-y. Epub 2021 Jun 1.
5
Full-mouth rehabilitation of screw-retained maxillary and mandibular hybrid denture.螺丝固位上颌和下颌混合义齿的全口修复
Natl J Maxillofac Surg. 2020 Jan-Jun;11(1):146-149. doi: 10.4103/njms.NJMS_22_19. Epub 2020 Jun 18.
6
Digital evaluation of axial displacement by implant-abutment connection type: An study.通过种植体-基台连接类型对轴向位移进行数字评估:一项研究。
J Adv Prosthodont. 2018 Oct;10(5):388-394. doi: 10.4047/jap.2018.10.5.388. Epub 2018 Oct 22.
7
Accuracy of new implant impression technique using dual arch tray and bite impression coping.使用双牙弓托盘和咬合印模帽的新型种植体印模技术的准确性
J Adv Prosthodont. 2018 Aug;10(4):265-270. doi: 10.4047/jap.2018.10.4.265. Epub 2018 Aug 17.
8
Need for a reliable alternative to custom-made Implant Impression trays: An study comparing accuracy of custom trays versus specialized aluminum stock tray.需要一种可靠的定制种植体印模托盘替代品:一项比较定制托盘与专用铝制成品托盘准确性的研究。
J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2018 Jul-Sep;18(3):271-276. doi: 10.4103/jips.jips_232_17.
9
Accuracy of fit of implant-supported bars fabricated on definitive casts made by different dental stones.在由不同牙科石膏制作的最终模型上制作的种植体支持杆的贴合精度。
J Clin Exp Dent. 2018 Mar 1;10(3):e252-e263. doi: 10.4317/jced.54603. eCollection 2018 Mar.
10
Complications in implant dentistry.口腔种植学中的并发症。
Eur J Dent. 2017 Jan-Mar;11(1):135-140. doi: 10.4103/ejd.ejd_340_16.