• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在两种弹性印模材料中替换三个锥形转移印模帽的准确性。

Accuracy of replacing three tapered transfer impression copings in two elastomeric impression materials.

作者信息

Liou A D, Nicholls J I, Yuodelis R A, Brudvik J S

机构信息

Department of Restorative Dentistry, University of Washington, Seattle 98195.

出版信息

Int J Prosthodont. 1993 Jul-Aug;6(4):377-83.

PMID:8240649
Abstract

The accuracy of replacing three manufacturers' (Dental Imaging Associates, Implant Innovations Inc, and Steri-Oss) tapered transfer impression copings into impressions made with two different materials (Impregum F and Extrude) was evaluated. Five operators replaced these copings into the elastomeric impression materials. The angular deviations (replacement error) of the copings between the control (original) position and the replaced position in the impressions were evaluated. It was found that no one coping could be replaced into the impressions accurately and consistently by all five operators. However, there were significant differences in replacement accuracy between the three copings. Lower angular deviations were found for the Steri-Oss and Dental Imaging Associates copings when compared to the Implant Innovations coping. There was no significant difference in replacement accuracy between the two impression materials.

摘要

评估了将三家制造商(牙科影像协会、种植体创新公司和思康)的锥形转移印模帽替换到由两种不同材料(依必安F和挤压材料)制成的印模中的准确性。五名操作人员将这些印模帽替换到弹性印模材料中。评估了印模中对照(原始)位置与替换位置之间印模帽的角度偏差(替换误差)。结果发现,没有一个印模帽能被所有五名操作人员准确且一致地替换到印模中。然而,三种印模帽之间的替换准确性存在显著差异。与种植体创新公司的印模帽相比,思康和牙科影像协会的印模帽角度偏差更低。两种印模材料之间的替换准确性没有显著差异。

相似文献

1
Accuracy of replacing three tapered transfer impression copings in two elastomeric impression materials.在两种弹性印模材料中替换三个锥形转移印模帽的准确性。
Int J Prosthodont. 1993 Jul-Aug;6(4):377-83.
2
Evaluation of the accuracy of three techniques used for multiple implant abutment impressions.用于多个种植体基台印模的三种技术的准确性评估。
J Prosthet Dent. 2003 Feb;89(2):186-92. doi: 10.1067/mpr.2003.15.
3
Accuracy of impression techniques for implants. Part 2 - comparison of splinting techniques.种植体印模技术的准确性。第2部分 - 夹板技术的比较。
J Prosthodont. 2009 Feb;18(2):172-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-849X.2008.00325.x. Epub 2008 Oct 13.
4
Effect of subgingival depth of implant placement on the dimensional accuracy of the implant impression: an in vitro study.种植体植入龈下深度对种植体印模尺寸精度的影响:一项体外研究。
J Prosthet Dent. 2008 Feb;99(2):107-13. doi: 10.1016/S0022-3913(08)60026-8.
5
Accuracy of different impression techniques for internal-connection implants.不同附着体种植义齿印模技术准确性的研究。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2009 Sep-Oct;24(5):823-30.
6
Master cast accuracy in single-tooth implant replacement cases: an in vitro comparison. A technical note.单颗牙种植修复病例中 master cast 的精度:一项体外比较。技术说明。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2005 May-Jun;20(3):455-60.
7
Effect of implant angulation, connection length, and impression material on the dimensional accuracy of implant impressions: an in vitro comparative study.种植体角度、连接长度和印模材料对种植体印模精度影响的体外比较研究。
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2010 May;12 Suppl 1:e63-76. doi: 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2009.00167.x. Epub 2009 May 8.
8
Accuracy of implant impressions with different impression coping types and shapes.不同印模台类型和形状的种植体印模精度。
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2012 Apr;14(2):218-25. doi: 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2009.00241.x. Epub 2009 Oct 5.
9
Accuracy of impression techniques for implants. Part 1--Influence of transfer copings surface abrasion.种植体印模技术的准确性。第1部分——转移杆表面磨损的影响。
J Prosthodont. 2008 Dec;17(8):641-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-849X.2008.00308.x.
10
Evaluation of the accuracy of implant-level impression techniques for internal-connection implant prostheses in parallel and divergent models.平行和发散模型中用于内连接种植体修复体的种植体水平印模技术准确性评估。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2007 Sep-Oct;22(5):761-8.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison of the accuracy of fixture-level implant impressions using two different materials for splinting.使用两种不同材料进行夹板固定时种植体水平印模准确性的比较。
J Adv Periodontol Implant Dent. 2022 Oct 17;14(2):134-140. doi: 10.34172/japid.2022.019. eCollection 2022.
2
The impact of impression coping geometrical design on accuracy of implant impressions: an experimental study.印模帽几何设计对种植体印模准确性的影响:一项实验研究。
Int J Implant Dent. 2020 Oct 10;6(1):54. doi: 10.1186/s40729-020-00256-0.
3
Accuracy of new implant impression technique using dual arch tray and bite impression coping.
使用双牙弓托盘和咬合印模帽的新型种植体印模技术的准确性
J Adv Prosthodont. 2018 Aug;10(4):265-270. doi: 10.4047/jap.2018.10.4.265. Epub 2018 Aug 17.
4
A Comparison of implant impression precision: Different materials and techniques.种植体印模精度的比较:不同材料与技术
J Clin Exp Dent. 2018 Feb 1;10(2):e151-e157. doi: 10.4317/jced.54457. eCollection 2018 Feb.
5
Effect of Polyvinyl Siloxane Viscosity on Accuracy of Dental Implant Impressions.聚乙烯基硅氧烷粘度对牙种植体印模准确性的影响。
J Dent (Tehran). 2017 Jan;14(1):40-47.
6
A comparative analysis of the accuracy of implant master casts fabricated from two different transfer impression techniques.对两种不同转移印模技术制作的种植体主模型准确性的比较分析。
J Int Soc Prev Community Dent. 2016 Mar-Apr;6(2):142-8. doi: 10.4103/2231-0762.178747.
7
Accuracy of different impression materials in parallel and nonparallel implants.不同印模材料在平行和非平行种植体中的准确性。
Dent Res J (Isfahan). 2015 Jul-Aug;12(4):315-22. doi: 10.4103/1735-3327.161429.
8
Effect of different impression materials and techniques on the dimensional accuracy of implant definitive casts.不同印模材料和技术对种植体最终模型尺寸精度的影响。
Dent Res J (Isfahan). 2015 Mar-Apr;12(2):136-43.
9
In vitro evaluation of the precision of working casts for implant-supported restoration with multiple abutments.多基台种植体支持修复工作模型精度的体外评估
J Appl Oral Sci. 2007 Jun;15(3):241-6. doi: 10.1590/s1678-77572007000300016.