• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

针对老年人社交孤立的干预措施:系统评价。

Interventions targeting social isolation in older people: a systematic review.

机构信息

Primary Care Research Group, Peninsula College of Medicine & Dentistry, University of Exeter, Smeall Building, St Luke's Campus, Magdalen Road, Exeter, EX1 2LU, UK.

出版信息

BMC Public Health. 2011 Aug 15;11:647. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-11-647.

DOI:10.1186/1471-2458-11-647
PMID:21843337
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3170621/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Targeting social isolation in older people is a growing public health concern. The proportion of older people in society has increased in recent decades, and it is estimated that approximately 25% of the population will be aged 60 or above within the next 20 to 40 years. Social isolation is prevalent amongst older people and evidence indicates the detrimental effect that it can have on health and wellbeing. The aim of this review was to assess the effectiveness of interventions designed to alleviate social isolation and loneliness in older people.

METHODS

Relevant electronic databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, ASSIA, IBSS, PsycINFO, PubMed, DARE, Social Care Online, the Cochrane Library and CINAHL) were systematically searched using an extensive search strategy, for randomised controlled trials and quasi-experimental studies published in English before May 2009. Additional articles were identified through citation tracking. Studies were included if they related to older people, if the intervention aimed to alleviate social isolation and loneliness, if intervention participants were compared against inactive controls and, if treatment effects were reported. Two independent reviewers extracted data using a standardised form. Narrative synthesis and vote-counting methods were used to summarise and interpret study data.

RESULTS

Thirty two studies were included in the review. There was evidence of substantial heterogeneity in the interventions delivered and the overall quality of included studies indicated a medium to high risk of bias. Across the three domains of social, mental and physical health, 79% of group-based interventions and 55% of one-to-one interventions reported at least one improved participant outcome. Over 80% of participatory interventions produced beneficial effects across the same domains, compared with 44% of those categorised as non-participatory. Of interventions categorised as having a theoretical basis, 87% reported beneficial effects across the three domains compared with 59% of interventions with no evident theoretical foundation. Regarding intervention type, 86% of those providing activities and 80% of those providing support resulted in improved participant outcomes, compared with 60% of home visiting and 25% of internet training interventions. Fifty eight percent of interventions that explicitly targeted socially isolated or lonely older people reported positive outcomes, compared with 80% of studies with no explicit targeting.

CONCLUSIONS

More, well-conducted studies of the effectiveness of social interventions for alleviating social isolation are needed to improve the evidence base. However, it appeared that common characteristics of effective interventions were those developed within the context of a theoretical basis, and those offering social activity and/or support within a group format. Interventions in which older people are active participants also appeared more likely to be effective. Future interventions incorporating all of these characteristics may therefore be more successful in targeting social isolation in older people.

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7718/3170621/db48a6b6d4db/1471-2458-11-647-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7718/3170621/db48a6b6d4db/1471-2458-11-647-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7718/3170621/db48a6b6d4db/1471-2458-11-647-1.jpg
摘要

背景

针对老年人的社交孤立问题是一个日益受到关注的公共卫生问题。在过去几十年中,社会中的老年人比例有所增加,据估计,在未来 20 到 40 年内,大约 25%的人口将年满 60 岁或以上。老年人中普遍存在社交孤立现象,有证据表明,这种现象对健康和幸福会产生有害影响。本综述的目的是评估旨在缓解老年人社交孤立和孤独感的干预措施的有效性。

方法

系统地检索了相关电子数据库(MEDLINE、EMBASE、ASSIA、IBSS、PsycINFO、PubMed、DARE、Social Care Online、Cochrane 图书馆和 CINAHL),使用广泛的搜索策略,检索 2009 年 5 月以前发表的英文随机对照试验和准实验研究。通过引文追踪确定了其他文章。如果研究涉及老年人,如果干预措施旨在缓解社交孤立和孤独感,如果干预参与者与非活动对照组进行比较,并且如果报告了治疗效果,则将研究纳入。两名独立的审查员使用标准化表格提取数据。使用叙述性综合和投票计数方法来总结和解释研究数据。

结果

综述纳入了 32 项研究。所提供的干预措施存在很大的异质性,纳入研究的整体质量表明存在中等到高度偏倚风险。在社会、心理和身体健康的三个领域中,79%的群体干预和 55%的一对一干预报告了至少一项改善的参与者结局。80%以上的参与式干预在相同的领域产生了有益的效果,而 44%的非参与式干预则没有。在有理论基础的干预中,87%的干预在三个领域报告了有益的效果,而没有明显理论基础的干预则为 59%。关于干预类型,提供活动的干预中有 86%,提供支持的干预中有 80%导致了参与者结局的改善,而家访的干预中有 60%,互联网培训的干预中有 25%。明确针对社交孤立或孤独的老年人的干预措施有 58%报告了积极的结果,而没有明确目标的研究则为 80%。

结论

需要更多设计良好的针对社交孤立的社会干预措施有效性的研究,以改善证据基础。然而,有效的干预措施的共同特征似乎是那些在理论基础上制定的,以及那些在小组形式下提供社交活动和/或支持的。老年人作为积极参与者的干预措施也似乎更有可能有效。因此,未来包含所有这些特征的干预措施可能会更成功地针对老年人的社交孤立问题。

相似文献

1
Interventions targeting social isolation in older people: a systematic review.针对老年人社交孤立的干预措施:系统评价。
BMC Public Health. 2011 Aug 15;11:647. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-11-647.
2
Interventions for preventing abuse in the elderly.预防老年人受虐待的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Aug 16;2016(8):CD010321. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010321.pub2.
3
Education support services for improving school engagement and academic performance of children and adolescents with a chronic health condition.改善患有慢性病的儿童和青少年的学校参与度和学业成绩的教育支持服务。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Feb 8;2(2):CD011538. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011538.pub2.
4
Prevention of self-harm and suicide in young people up to the age of 25 in education settings.在教育环境中预防25岁及以下年轻人的自我伤害和自杀行为。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Dec 20;12(12):CD013844. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013844.pub2.
5
Home treatment for mental health problems: a systematic review.心理健康问题的居家治疗:一项系统综述
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(15):1-139. doi: 10.3310/hta5150.
6
Systemic treatments for metastatic cutaneous melanoma.转移性皮肤黑色素瘤的全身治疗
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Feb 6;2(2):CD011123. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011123.pub2.
7
Psychological and/or educational interventions for the prevention of depression in children and adolescents.预防儿童和青少年抑郁症的心理和/或教育干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2004(1):CD003380. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003380.pub2.
8
Interventions targeted at women to encourage the uptake of cervical screening.针对女性的干预措施,以鼓励她们接受宫颈癌筛查。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Sep 6;9(9):CD002834. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002834.pub3.
9
Participation in environmental enhancement and conservation activities for health and well-being in adults: a review of quantitative and qualitative evidence.成年人参与促进环境改善和保护活动对健康与福祉的影响:定量和定性证据综述
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 May 21;2016(5):CD010351. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010351.pub2.
10
Behavioral interventions to reduce risk for sexual transmission of HIV among men who have sex with men.降低男男性行为者中艾滋病毒性传播风险的行为干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008 Jul 16(3):CD001230. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001230.pub2.

引用本文的文献

1
From living well to dying well with dementia: The significance of an expanded understanding of loss for end-of-life care.从与痴呆症相伴的美好生活到善终:拓展对丧失的理解对临终关怀的意义。
Palliat Care Soc Pract. 2025 Sep 1;19:26323524251347653. doi: 10.1177/26323524251347653. eCollection 2025.
2
Investigation and analysis of mental health status of the older adult in western rural areas.西部农村地区老年人心理健康状况的调查与分析
Front Public Health. 2025 Jul 16;13:1612600. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1612600. eCollection 2025.
3
Promoting healthy aging through intergenerational exchange and digital empowerment: a pilot randomized controlled trial.

本文引用的文献

1
Preventing social isolation and loneliness among older people: a systematic review of health promotion interventions.预防老年人的社会隔离和孤独感:健康促进干预措施的系统评价
Nurs Older People. 2005 Mar 1;17(1):40. doi: 10.7748/nop.17.1.40.s11.
2
A meta-analysis of interventions to reduce loneliness.孤独感干预措施的荟萃分析。
Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 2011 Aug;15(3):219-66. doi: 10.1177/1088868310377394. Epub 2010 Aug 17.
3
Social relationships and mortality risk: a meta-analytic review.社会关系与死亡风险:一项荟萃分析研究。
通过代际交流和数字赋能促进健康老龄化:一项随机对照试验试点
Front Psychiatry. 2025 Jul 16;16:1637181. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2025.1637181. eCollection 2025.
4
The role of ICT use in reducing social isolation among older adults during the COVID-19 pandemic: evidence from frail and healthy older adults in Sakai City, Japan.信息通信技术在新冠疫情期间减少老年人社会隔离方面的作用:来自日本堺市体弱和健康老年人的证据。
BMC Public Health. 2025 Jul 2;25(1):2284. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-23449-x.
5
Effects of a Mobile Storytelling App (Huiyou) on Social Participation Among People With Mild Cognitive Impairment: Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial.一款移动故事讲述应用程序(惠友)对轻度认知障碍患者社交参与的影响:初步随机对照试验
JMIR Hum Factors. 2025 Jun 18;12:e70177. doi: 10.2196/70177.
6
Contextual Action Theory in Nursing Home Settings: A Conceptual Framework for Considering the Active Role of Residents.养老院环境中的情境行动理论:一个考虑居民积极作用的概念框架。
J Popul Ageing. 2025;18(1):107-118. doi: 10.1007/s12062-024-09448-7. Epub 2024 Apr 24.
7
Mobile Gaming for Cognitive Health in Older Adults: A Scoping Review of App Store Applications.老年人认知健康的移动游戏:应用商店应用的范围综述
Healthcare (Basel). 2025 Apr 9;13(8):855. doi: 10.3390/healthcare13080855.
8
Shared reading interventions to promote psychosocial well-being in older adults: a systematic review.促进老年人心理社会幸福感的共享阅读干预措施:一项系统综述
Health Promot Int. 2025 Mar 5;40(2). doi: 10.1093/heapro/daaf036.
9
A meta-analysis of behaviour change techniques in social interventions targeting improved cognitive function in older adults.一项针对改善老年人认知功能的社会干预中行为改变技术的荟萃分析。
BMC Public Health. 2025 Mar 27;25(1):1158. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-22229-x.
10
What works to reduce loneliness: a rapid systematic review of 101 interventions.哪些方法有助于减少孤独感:对101项干预措施的快速系统评价
J Public Health Policy. 2025 Jun;46(2):245-268. doi: 10.1057/s41271-025-00561-1. Epub 2025 Mar 6.
PLoS Med. 2010 Jul 27;7(7):e1000316. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000316.
4
The impact of social isolation on the health status and health-related quality of life of older people.社会隔离对老年人健康状况和健康相关生活质量的影响。
Qual Life Res. 2011 Feb;20(1):57-67. doi: 10.1007/s11136-010-9717-2. Epub 2010 Jul 25.
5
CONSORT 2010 statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials.CONSORT 2010 声明:平行组随机试验报告的更新指南。
BMJ. 2010 Mar 23;340:c332. doi: 10.1136/bmj.c332.
6
Can the higher risk of disability onset among older people who live alone be alleviated by strong social relations? A longitudinal study of non-disabled men and women.独居老人残疾发病风险较高的问题能否通过强化社会关系得到缓解?对非残疾男性和女性的纵向研究。
Age Ageing. 2010 May;39(3):319-26. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afq020. Epub 2010 Mar 5.
7
Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement.系统评价与Meta分析的首选报告项目:PRISMA声明。
BMJ. 2009 Jul 21;339:b2535. doi: 10.1136/bmj.b2535.
8
Social disconnectedness, perceived isolation, and health among older adults.老年人的社会脱节、感知到的孤独感与健康状况
J Health Soc Behav. 2009 Mar;50(1):31-48. doi: 10.1177/002214650905000103.
9
Effects of psychosocial group rehabilitation on health, use of health care services, and mortality of older persons suffering from loneliness: a randomized, controlled trial.心理社会小组康复对孤独老年人的健康、医疗服务使用及死亡率的影响:一项随机对照试验。
J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2009 Jul;64(7):792-800. doi: 10.1093/gerona/glp011. Epub 2009 Feb 17.
10
Revisiting the relationship between baseline risk and risk under treatment.重新审视基线风险与治疗中风险之间的关系。
Emerg Themes Epidemiol. 2009 Feb 17;6:1. doi: 10.1186/1742-7622-6-1.