Suppr超能文献

镰状细胞病患儿的医疗质量指标。

Quality-of-care indicators for children with sickle cell disease.

机构信息

Department of Pediatrics, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.

出版信息

Pediatrics. 2011 Sep;128(3):484-93. doi: 10.1542/peds.2010-1791. Epub 2011 Aug 15.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To develop a set of quality-of-care indicators for the management of children with sickle cell disease (SCD) who are cared for in a variety of settings by addressing the broad spectrum of complications relevant to their illness.

METHODS

We used the Rand/University of California Los Angeles appropriateness method, a modified Delphi method, to develop the indicators. The process included a comprehensive literature review with ratings of the evidence and 2 rounds of anonymous ratings by an expert panel (nominated by leaders of various US academic societies and the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute). The panelists met face-to-face to discuss each indicator in between the 2 rounds.

RESULTS

The panel recommended 41 indicators that cover 18 topics; 17 indicators described routine health care maintenance, 15 described acute or subacute care, and 9 described chronic care. The panel identified 8 indicators most likely to have a large positive effect on improving quality of life and/or health outcomes for children with SCD, which covered 6 topics: timely assessment and treatment of pain and fever; comprehensive planning; penicillin prophylaxis; transfusion; and the transition to adult care.

CONCLUSIONS

Children with SCD are at risk for serious morbidities and early mortality, yet efforts to assess and improve the quality of their care have been limited compared with other chronic childhood conditions. This set of 41 indicators can be used to assess quality of care and provide a starting point for quality-improvement efforts.

摘要

目的

通过解决与疾病相关的广泛并发症,为在各种环境中接受镰状细胞病(SCD)治疗的儿童制定一套护理质量指标,以涵盖其疾病的广泛并发症。

方法

我们使用 Rand/加州大学洛杉矶分校适宜性方法,一种改良的 Delphi 方法来制定这些指标。该过程包括全面的文献回顾,对证据进行评分,并由专家小组(由美国各学术协会和国家心脏、肺和血液研究所的领导人提名)进行两轮匿名评分。小组成员在两轮之间面对面讨论每个指标。

结果

小组推荐了 41 个指标,涵盖了 18 个主题;17 个指标描述了常规的医疗保健维护,15 个描述了急性或亚急性护理,9 个描述了慢性护理。小组确定了 8 个最有可能对改善 SCD 儿童生活质量和/或健康结果产生重大积极影响的指标,涵盖了 6 个主题:及时评估和治疗疼痛和发热;全面规划;青霉素预防;输血;以及向成人护理的过渡。

结论

患有 SCD 的儿童面临严重的发病率和早期死亡率的风险,但与其他慢性儿童疾病相比,评估和改善其护理质量的努力有限。这组 41 个指标可用于评估护理质量,并为质量改进工作提供起点。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验