Division of Critical Care Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alta.
CMAJ. 2011 Oct 4;183(14):1589-95. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.100034. Epub 2011 Aug 15.
Survival outcomes after cardiac or respiratory arrest occurring outside of intensive care units (ICUs) has been well described. We investigated survival outcomes of adults whose arrest occurred in ICUs and determined predictors of decreased survival.
We reviewed all records of adults who experienced cardiac or respiratory arrest from Jan. 1, 2000, to Apr. 30, 2005, in ICUs at four hospitals serving Edmonton, Alberta. We evaluated patient and clinical characteristics, as well as survival outcomes during a five-year follow-up period. We determined risk factors for immediate (within 24 hours) and later death.
Of the 517 patients included in the study, 59.6% were able to be resuscitated, 30.4% survived to discharge from ICU, 26.9% survived to discharge from hospital, 24.3% survived to one year, and 15.9% survived to five years. Pulseless electrical activity or asystole was the most common rhythm (45.8% of the arrests). Survival was lowest among patients with an arrest due to pulseless electrical activity or asystole: only 10.6% survived to one year, compared with 36.3% who had other arrest rhythms (p < 0.001). Independent predictors of decreased later survival (eight months or more after arrest) were increasing age (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 1.06, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.03-1.09) and longer duration of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) (adjusted HR 1.38, 95% CI 1.03-1.83, per additional logarithm of a minute of CPR).
Our study showed no major improvement in survival following cardiac arrest with pulseless electrical activity or asystole as the presenting rhythm in the ICU despite many advances in critical care over the previous two decades. The independent predictors of death within 24 hours after arrest in an ICU were sex, the presenting rhythm and the duration of CPR. Predictors of later death (eight months or more after arrest) were age and duration of CPR.
在重症监护病房(ICU)外发生的心搏骤停或呼吸骤停后的生存结果已有很好的描述。我们调查了在 ICU 发生心搏骤停或呼吸骤停的成年患者的生存结果,并确定了降低生存率的预测因素。
我们回顾了 2000 年 1 月 1 日至 2005 年 4 月 30 日期间在艾伯塔省埃德蒙顿的四家医院的 ICU 中发生心搏骤停或呼吸骤停的所有成年患者的记录。我们评估了患者和临床特征,以及在五年随访期间的生存结果。我们确定了即刻(24 小时内)和后期死亡的危险因素。
在纳入研究的 517 名患者中,59.6%能够复苏,30.4%存活至 ICU 出院,26.9%存活至医院出院,24.3%存活至 1 年,15.9%存活至 5 年。无脉性电活动或心搏停止是最常见的节律(45.8%的骤停)。由于无脉性电活动或心搏停止导致骤停的患者的生存率最低:只有 10.6%存活至 1 年,而其他节律的患者为 36.3%(p < 0.001)。后期生存(骤停后 8 个月或更长时间)降低的独立预测因素是年龄增加(校正后的危险比[HR]1.06,95%置信区间[CI]1.03-1.09)和心肺复苏(CPR)持续时间延长(校正后的 HR 1.38,95%CI 1.03-1.83,CPR 每增加一分钟的对数)。
尽管在过去的二十年中重症监护有了许多进展,但我们的研究表明,在 ICU 中无脉性电活动或心搏停止作为主要节律的情况下,心脏骤停后的生存率并没有明显改善。在 ICU 中,在复苏后 24 小时内死亡的独立预测因素是性别、主要节律和 CPR 持续时间。复苏后 8 个月或更长时间死亡的预测因素是年龄和 CPR 持续时间。