State University of New York at Stony Brook, Stony Brook, NY, USA.
Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 2011 Nov;15(4):332-51. doi: 10.1177/1088868311411103. Epub 2011 Aug 15.
This work identifies how cross-group friendships are conceptualized and measured in intergroup research, investigates which operationalizations yield the strongest effects on intergroup attitudes, explores potential moderators, and discusses the theoretical importance of the findings. Prior meta-analyses have provided initial evidence that cross-group friendships are especially powerful forms of intergroup contact. Although studies of cross-group friendship have grown considerably in recent years, varied assessments leave us without a clear understanding of how different operationalizations affect relationships between friendship and attitudes. With a greatly expanded database of relevant studies, the authors compared friendship-attitude associations across a wide range of specific conceptualizations. Time spent and self-disclosure with outgroup friends yielded significantly greater associations with attitudes than other friendship measures, suggesting that attitudes are most likely to improve when cross-group friendships involve behavioral engagement. Processes underlying cross-group friendships are discussed, as are implications for future research and application.
这项工作确定了在群体间研究中如何概念化和衡量跨群体友谊,调查了哪些操作化方法对群体间态度产生最强的影响,探讨了潜在的调节因素,并讨论了这些发现的理论重要性。先前的荟萃分析已经初步证明,跨群体友谊是最有力的群体间接触形式。尽管近年来对跨群体友谊的研究有了相当大的增长,但各种评估方法使我们无法清楚地了解不同的操作化方法如何影响友谊和态度之间的关系。通过一个扩展了的相关研究数据库,作者比较了广泛的具体概念化下的友谊-态度关联。与群体外朋友共度的时间和自我表露与态度的关联程度显著大于其他友谊衡量标准,这表明当跨群体友谊涉及行为参与时,态度最有可能得到改善。讨论了跨群体友谊的潜在过程,以及对未来研究和应用的启示。