• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

创建紧凑的比较医疗保健信息:呈现白内障和全髋关节或膝关节置换手术的关键质量属性有哪些?

Creating compact comparative health care information: what are the key quality attributes to present for cataract and total hip or knee replacement surgery?

机构信息

NIVEL (Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research), Research Program Patient Perspective and Demand-Driven Health Care, Utrecht, the Netherlands (OCD, PS, JR, MH)

VU University Medical Center, Department of Public and Occupational Health and the EMGO Institute for Health and Care Research, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (OCD)

出版信息

Med Decis Making. 2012 Mar-Apr;32(2):287-300. doi: 10.1177/0272989X11415115. Epub 2011 Aug 15.

DOI:10.1177/0272989X11415115
PMID:21844381
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The recent emphasis on providing comparative health care data to the public has resulted in a large amount of online information. To focus on the most essential attributes, insight is needed into which attributes are actually considered by consumers.

OBJECTIVE

To assess which attributes of Dutch hospital performance information contribute most to consumers' hospital choice for cataract and total hip or knee replacement surgery.

DESIGN

Two discrete-choice experiments were performed: one for cataract surgery and one for total hip or knee replacement surgery. Participants viewed hypothetical hospitals based on representative values for 10 attributes (e.g., distance to the hospital, waiting time for the surgery, conduct of professionals, information provision, complication rate) and were asked to select the hospital they would choose if they needed treatment. We used multilevel logistic regression analysis to test the effects of the attributes and the interactions between attributes and respondent characteristics on consumers' hospital choice.

RESULTS

All except one attribute (length of the first appointment with the ophthalmologist) contributed significantly to consumers' choices. Although some differences were found between cataract and hip/knee replacement surgery, the most influential attributes for both types of surgeries were distance, waiting time, and the attributes of patient safety (complication rate of capsular rupture and the use of procedures to prevent adverse effects of thrombosis). Interaction effects were found between hospital attributes, on one hand, and age, education, and consumer choice orientation, on the other hand.

CONCLUSIONS

As for cataract and total hip/knee replacement surgery, the attributes that seem most important to consumers when choosing a hospital are access (waiting time and distance) and patient safety attributes.

摘要

背景

最近强调向公众提供比较医疗保健数据,导致了大量的在线信息。为了关注最重要的属性,需要深入了解消费者实际上考虑哪些属性。

目的

评估荷兰医院绩效信息的哪些属性对白内障和全髋关节或膝关节置换手术的消费者选择医院的影响最大。

设计

进行了两项离散选择实验:一项用于白内障手术,另一项用于全髋关节或膝关节置换手术。参与者根据 10 个属性的代表性值(例如,到医院的距离、手术等待时间、专业人员的行为、信息提供、并发症发生率)查看假设的医院,并被要求选择如果需要治疗,他们会选择哪家医院。我们使用多水平逻辑回归分析来测试属性的影响以及属性与受访者特征之间的相互作用对消费者医院选择的影响。

结果

除了一个属性(第一次与眼科医生预约的时间长度)外,所有属性都对消费者的选择有显著影响。尽管在白内障和髋关节/膝关节置换手术之间发现了一些差异,但对这两种手术最有影响的属性是距离、等待时间和患者安全属性(囊膜破裂的并发症发生率和使用预防血栓副作用的程序)。还发现了医院属性与年龄、教育程度和消费者选择取向之间的交互作用。

结论

对于白内障和全髋关节/膝关节置换手术,消费者在选择医院时最重要的属性似乎是可及性(等待时间和距离)和患者安全属性。

相似文献

1
Creating compact comparative health care information: what are the key quality attributes to present for cataract and total hip or knee replacement surgery?创建紧凑的比较医疗保健信息:呈现白内障和全髋关节或膝关节置换手术的关键质量属性有哪些?
Med Decis Making. 2012 Mar-Apr;32(2):287-300. doi: 10.1177/0272989X11415115. Epub 2011 Aug 15.
2
What publicly available quality metrics do hip and knee arthroplasty patients care about most when selecting a hospital in Maryland: a discrete choice experiment.当马里兰州的髋膝关节置换患者选择医院时,他们最关注哪些可公开获得的质量指标:一项离散选择实验。
BMJ Open. 2019 May 19;9(5):e028202. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-028202.
3
The Consumer Quality Index Hip Knee Questionnaire measuring patients' experiences with quality of care after a total hip or knee arthroplasty.消费者质量指数髋关节膝关节问卷用于衡量全髋关节或膝关节置换术后患者对护理质量的体验。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2007 Apr 26;7:60. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-7-60.
4
Waiting times and patient perspectives for total hip and knee arthroplasty in rural and urban Ontario.安大略省农村和城市地区全髋关节和膝关节置换术的等待时间及患者观点。
Can J Surg. 2005 Oct;48(5):355-60.
5
Seasonality of service provision in hip and knee surgery: a possible contributor to waiting times? A time series analysis.髋关节和膝关节手术服务提供的季节性:等待时间的一个可能因素?一项时间序列分析。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2006 Mar 1;6:22. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-6-22.
6
Understanding and using comparative healthcare information; the effect of the amount of information and consumer characteristics and skills.了解和使用比较医疗保健信息;信息数量和消费者特征与技能的影响。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2012 Sep 7;12:101. doi: 10.1186/1472-6947-12-101.
7
[What determines waiting time for cataract surgery, knee arthroscopy and total hip arthroplasty and how satisfied are the patients?].[白内障手术、膝关节镜检查和全髋关节置换术的等待时间由何决定,患者满意度如何?]
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 1995 Jul 22;139(29):1489-93.
8
Different patient subgroup, different ranking? Which quality indicators do patients find important when choosing a hospital for hip- or knee arthroplasty?不同患者亚组,不同排名?患者在选择髋关节或膝关节置换术医院时看重哪些质量指标?
BMC Health Serv Res. 2011 Nov 3;11:299. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-11-299.
9
[Citizens opinions, experiences and perceptions about waiting lists for elective cataract surgery and hip and knee replacement. ].[公民对选择性白内障手术以及髋关节和膝关节置换手术等候名单的意见、经历和看法。]
Aten Primaria. 2004 Feb 15;33(2):86-94. doi: 10.1016/s0212-6567(04)79356-7.
10
[Current status of total hip and knee replacements in Germany - results of a nation-wide survey].[德国全髋关节和膝关节置换术的现状——一项全国性调查的结果]
Z Orthop Unfall. 2014 Oct;152(5):455-61. doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1383023. Epub 2014 Oct 14.

引用本文的文献

1
The elicitation of patient preferences for hip replacement surgery: a discrete choice experiment.髋关节置换手术患者偏好的诱导:一项离散选择实验。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2025 Feb 18;25(1):268. doi: 10.1186/s12913-025-12393-6.
2
The elicitation of patient and physician preferences for calculating consumer-based composite measures on hospital report cards: results of two discrete choice experiments.患者和医生对计算医院报告卡上基于消费者的综合指标的偏好的启发:两项离散选择实验的结果。
Eur J Health Econ. 2024 Aug;25(6):1071-1085. doi: 10.1007/s10198-023-01650-2. Epub 2023 Dec 15.
3
Understanding and comparing the medical tourism cancer patient with the locally managed patient: A case control study.
理解和比较医疗旅游癌症患者与本地管理患者:一项病例对照研究。
PLoS One. 2022 Sep 21;17(9):e0273162. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0273162. eCollection 2022.
4
Do patients' preferences prevail in hospital selection?: a comparison between discrete choice experiments and revealed hospital choice.患者的偏好是否在医院选择中占主导地位?:离散选择实验与揭示性医院选择的比较。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Sep 8;22(1):1136. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-08403-6.
5
Perspective of potential patients on the hospital volume-outcome relationship and the minimum volume threshold for total knee arthroplasty: a qualitative focus group and interview study.潜在患者对医院量效关系和全膝关节置换术最低容量阈值的看法:一项定性焦点小组和访谈研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Jul 2;21(1):633. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-06641-8.
6
Motivational factors for choosing treatment destinations among the patients treated overseas from the United Arab Emirates: results from the knowledge, attitudes and perceptions survey 2012.阿拉伯联合酋长国海外就医患者选择治疗目的地的动机因素:2012年知识、态度与认知调查结果
Trop Dis Travel Med Vaccines. 2019 Sep 18;5:18. doi: 10.1186/s40794-019-0093-9. eCollection 2019.
7
Facts and Fears in Public Reporting: Patients' Information Needs and Priorities When Selecting a Hospital for Cancer Care.公众报告中的事实与担忧:患者在选择癌症治疗医院时的信息需求和优先事项。
Med Decis Making. 2019 Aug;39(6):632-641. doi: 10.1177/0272989X19855050. Epub 2019 Jun 21.
8
Characterizing Patient Preferences Surrounding Total Knee Arthroplasty.描述全膝关节置换术患者的偏好
JB JS Open Access. 2018 Oct 23;3(4):e0017. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.OA.18.00017. eCollection 2018 Dec 20.
9
Patients' Need for Tailored Comparative Health Care Information: A Qualitative Study on Choosing a Hospital.患者对定制化比较医疗保健信息的需求:一项关于选择医院的定性研究
J Med Internet Res. 2016 Nov 28;18(11):e297. doi: 10.2196/jmir.4436.
10
Multilevel Modeling and Policy Development: Guidelines and Applications to Medical Travel.多层次建模与政策制定:医疗旅游指南及应用
Front Psychol. 2016 May 24;7:752. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00752. eCollection 2016.