• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

研究和关怀能否在伦理上得到统一?

Can research and care be ethically integrated?

机构信息

Harvard University, USA.

出版信息

Hastings Cent Rep. 2011 Jul-Aug;41(4):37-46. doi: 10.1002/j.1552-146x.2011.tb00123.x.

DOI:10.1002/j.1552-146x.2011.tb00123.x
PMID:21845922
Abstract

Medical ethics assumes a clear boundary between clinical research and clinical medicine: one produces knowledge for the benefit of future patients, while the other provides optimal care to individuals right now. It also assumes that the two cannot be integrated without sacrificing the needs of the current patient to those of future patients. But integration could allow us to provide better care to everyone, now and in the future.

摘要

医学伦理学假定临床研究和临床医学之间有明确的界限

一个为未来患者的利益产生知识,而另一个为当前患者提供最佳护理。它还假定,如果不牺牲当前患者的需求来满足未来患者的需求,两者就不能整合。但整合可以让我们现在和将来为每个人提供更好的护理。

相似文献

1
Can research and care be ethically integrated?研究和关怀能否在伦理上得到统一?
Hastings Cent Rep. 2011 Jul-Aug;41(4):37-46. doi: 10.1002/j.1552-146x.2011.tb00123.x.
2
Research is care.
Hastings Cent Rep. 2012 May-Jun;42(3):7.
3
Justice in the application of science: beyond fair benefits.科学应用中的公正:超越公平受益
Am J Bioeth. 2010 Jun;10(6):54-6. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2010.483184.
4
Why adopt a maximin theory of exploitation?为什么要采用剥削的极大极小理论?
Am J Bioeth. 2010 Jun;10(6):38-9. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2010.482635.
5
Multiple forms of exploitation in international research: the need for multiple standards of fairness.国际研究中的多种剥削形式:需要多种公平标准。
Am J Bioeth. 2010 Jun;10(6):40-1. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2010.482631.
6
Human rights: the normative engine of fairness and research in developing countries.人权:发展中国家公平与研究的规范性引擎。
Am J Bioeth. 2010 Jun;10(6):47-9. doi: 10.1080/15265161003728811.
7
Fair benefits in developing countries: maximin as a good start.发展中国家的公平利益:最大最小值原则是一个良好的开端。
Am J Bioeth. 2010 Jun;10(6):36-7. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2010.482648.
8
International research and positive obligations: are they "transaction specific"?国际研究与积极义务:它们是“特定于交易的”吗?
Am J Bioeth. 2010 Jun;10(6):49-51. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2010.482633.
9
Response to open peer commentaries on "How to do research fairly in an unjust world".对关于“在一个不公正的世界中如何公正地开展研究”的公开同行评论的回应
Am J Bioeth. 2010 Jun;10(6):W4-6. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2010.492747.
10
The perverse consequences of a proposed global tax on research.一项拟议的全球科研税带来的有害后果。
Am J Bioeth. 2010 Jun;10(6):46-7. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2010.482641.

引用本文的文献

1
A Just Genomics Needs an ELSI of Translation.公正的基因组学需要转化的伦理、法律和社会影响研究。
Hastings Cent Rep. 2024 Dec;54 Suppl 2:S126-S135. doi: 10.1002/hast.4938.
2
Ethical issues in implementation science: perspectives from a National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute workshop.实施科学中的伦理问题:国家心肺血液研究所研讨会的观点。
Implement Sci. 2024 Nov 19;19(1):77. doi: 10.1186/s13012-024-01403-6.
3
Ethical Issues in Implementation Science: A Qualitative Interview Study of Participating Clinicians.实施科学中的伦理问题:对参与临床医生的定性访谈研究
AJOB Empir Bioeth. 2025 Jan-Mar;16(1):22-31. doi: 10.1080/23294515.2024.2388537. Epub 2024 Aug 13.
4
Pragmatic Clinical Trials: The Ethics of Conducting Research in the Real World.实用临床试验:在现实世界中开展研究的伦理问题。
Mayo Clin Proc. 2024 Sep;99(9):1369-1373. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2024.05.001. Epub 2024 Aug 5.
5
Clinical reasoning in pragmatic trial randomization: a qualitative interview study.实用临床试验随机分组中的临床推理:一项定性访谈研究。
Trials. 2023 Jun 27;24(1):431. doi: 10.1186/s13063-023-07445-3.
6
"It's personalized, but it's still bucket based": The promise of personalized medicine vs. the reality of genomic risk stratification in a breast cancer screening trial.“这是个性化的,但仍基于分组”:乳腺癌筛查试验中个性化医疗的前景与基因组风险分层的现实
New Genet Soc. 2022;41(3):228-253. doi: 10.1080/14636778.2022.2115348. Epub 2022 Sep 2.
7
Relationship building in pediatric research recruitment: Insights from qualitative interviews with research staff.儿科研究招募中的关系建立:对研究人员进行定性访谈的见解
J Clin Transl Sci. 2022 Oct 3;6(1):e138. doi: 10.1017/cts.2022.469. eCollection 2022.
8
Do Clinicians Have a Duty to Participate in Pragmatic Clinical Trials?临床医生是否有义务参与实用临床试验?
Am J Bioeth. 2023 Aug;23(8):22-32. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2022.2146784. Epub 2022 Nov 30.
9
Toward Meeting the Obligation of Respect for Persons in Pragmatic Clinical Trials.迈向满足实用临床试验中尊重人的义务。
Hastings Cent Rep. 2022 May;52(3):9-17. doi: 10.1002/hast.1391.
10
Think Pragmatically: Investigators' Obligations to Patient-Subjects When Research is Embedded in Care.务实思考:当研究嵌入医疗照护时,研究者对患者的义务。
Am J Bioeth. 2023 Aug;23(8):10-21. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2022.2063435. Epub 2022 Apr 18.