• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

A quantitative assessment of facial protection systems in elective hip arthroplasty.

作者信息

Hirpara Kieran Michael, O'Halloran Emily, O'Sullivan Michael

机构信息

Merlin Park Hospital, Galway, Ireland.

出版信息

Acta Orthop Belg. 2011 Jun;77(3):375-80.

PMID:21846007
Abstract

We aimed to assess the risk to surgeons of blood splatter during total hip arthroplasty. Hoods from personal protection systems used in 34 consecutive total hip replacements were collected and the area of blood splatter was measured and compared to goggles and visors. Thirty one primary THA's (13 cemented, 4 hybrid, 14 uncemented) and 3 revisions (1 hybrid, 2 uncemented) were collected. Splashes were detected on all of the masks with a mean of 034% cover. Splatter was greatest for the operating surgeon, followed by the first assistant, though the difference was not statistically significant. Operating personnel were at greater risk of contamination during uncemented arthroplasty (p < 0.0001; 95% CI). On average 50.60% and 45.40% of blood cover was outside the area protected by goggles and visors respectively. There was a significant difference between the Personal Protection Systems (PPS) and goggles (p = 0.0231; 95% CI) as well as between the PPS and visors (p = 0.0293; 95% CI).

摘要

相似文献

1
A quantitative assessment of facial protection systems in elective hip arthroplasty.
Acta Orthop Belg. 2011 Jun;77(3):375-80.
2
Splash in elective primary knee and hip replacement: are we adequately protected?选择性初次膝关节和髋关节置换术中的感染风险:我们是否得到了充分的保护?
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2009 Aug;91(8):1074-7. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.91B8.22079.
3
Risk of facial splashes in four major surgical specialties in a multicentre study.一项多中心研究中四个主要外科专业面部溅污的风险
J Hosp Infect. 2007 Sep;67(1):56-61. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2007.05.020. Epub 2007 Jul 31.
4
Surgical helmet systems.手术头盔系统
Health Devices. 1996 Apr;25(4):116-45.
5
The risks of splash injury when using power tools during orthopaedic surgery: a prospective study.骨科手术中使用电动工具时飞溅伤的风险:一项前瞻性研究。
Acta Orthop Belg. 2008 Oct;74(5):678-82.
6
Does cement increase the risk of infection in primary total hip arthroplasty? Revision rates in 56,275 cemented and uncemented primary THAs followed for 0-16 years in the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register.骨水泥会增加初次全髋关节置换术中感染的风险吗?在挪威关节置换登记处对56275例使用骨水泥和未使用骨水泥的初次全髋关节置换术进行了0至16年的随访,统计翻修率。
Acta Orthop. 2006 Jun;77(3):351-8. doi: 10.1080/17453670610046253.
7
Total hip arthroplasty for primary osteoarthrosis in younger patients in the Finnish arthroplasty register. 4,661 primary replacements followed for 0-22 years.芬兰关节置换登记处中年轻患者原发性骨关节炎的全髋关节置换术。4661例初次置换,随访0至22年。
Acta Orthop. 2005 Feb;76(1):28-41. doi: 10.1080/00016470510030292.
8
Risk of blood splashes to masks and goggles during cesarean section.剖宫产术中血液溅到口罩和护目镜上的风险。
Med Sci Monit. 2006 Feb;12(2):CR94-7. Epub 2006 Jan 26.
9
Should eye protection be worn during dermatological surgery: prospective observational study.皮肤科手术期间是否应佩戴眼部防护装置:前瞻性观察研究。
Br J Dermatol. 2007 Jun;156(6):1258-62. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2133.2007.07930.x.
10
Operating time and survival of primary total hip replacements: an analysis of 31,745 primary cemented and uncemented total hip replacements from local hospitals reported to the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register 1987-2001.初次全髋关节置换术的手术时间与生存率:对1987年至2001年向挪威关节置换登记处报告的来自当地医院的31745例初次骨水泥型和非骨水泥型全髋关节置换术的分析。
Acta Orthop Scand. 2004 Oct;75(5):524-32. doi: 10.1080/00016470410001376.

引用本文的文献

1
Is Your Surgical Helmet System Compromising the Sterile Field? A Systematic Review of Contamination Risks and Preventive Measures in Total Joint Arthroplasty.您的手术头盔系统是否会破坏无菌区域?全关节置换术中污染风险与预防措施的系统评价。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025 Feb 5. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003383.
2
Use of a Gigli Saw as a Substitute Osteotomy Tool When Oscillating Saw Malfunctions Occur During Hip Arthroplasty.髋关节置换术中摆动锯发生故障时,使用 Gigli 锯替代截骨工具。
Orthop Surg. 2022 Dec;14(12):3277-3282. doi: 10.1111/os.13555. Epub 2022 Oct 21.
3
How the Covid-19 pandemic affected shoulder and elbow practice in Turkey?
新冠疫情如何影响土耳其的肩肘科医疗实践?
JSES Int. 2020 Dec;4(4):705-708.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jseint.2020.08.020. Epub 2020 Oct 13.
4
Surgeon Personal Protection: An Underappreciated Benefit of Positive-pressure Exhaust Suits.正压排气防护服:外科医生个人防护的被低估益处。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2018 Jun;476(6):1341-1348. doi: 10.1007/s11999.0000000000000253.