Renaissance Clinical Research and Hypertension Center, Dallas, TX, USA.
Am J Cardiovasc Drugs. 2011 Oct 1;11(5):327-33. doi: 10.2165/11591970-000000000-00000.
Hypertension frequently coexists with diabetes mellitus, resulting in increased cardiovascular risk. Thus, BP control is crucial in decreasing morbidity and mortality in this difficult-to-treat patient population.
The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of aliskiren in hypertensive patients with diabetes not adequately responsive to the combination of valsartan and hydrochlorothiazide (HCT).
After a 1- to 4-week washout period, patients with a mean sitting diastolic BP (msDBP) ≥95 mmHg were treated with valsartan 160 mg for 2 weeks followed by valsartan/HCT 160 mg/25 mg for an additional 4 weeks (single-blind active run-in period). Patients whose msDBP remained ≥85 mmHg after the active run-in period were randomized (1 : 1) to receive aliskiren 150 mg (n = 184) or placebo (n = 179) as add-on therapy for 6 weeks. Aliskiren was then force-titrated to 300 mg once daily for another 6 weeks. Efficacy variables were: the change in msDBP and mean sitting systolic BP (msSBP) from baseline to week 12 endpoint, diastolic response (msDBP <80 mmHg or reduction of at least 10 mmHg), and BP control rate (<130/80 mmHg).
Of the 363 patients randomized, 328 (90.4%) completed the study (aliskiren and placebo groups: 89.7% and 91.1%, respectively). At week 12 endpoint, the least squares mean (LSM) changes in msDBP (aliskiren vs placebo: -5.8 vs -4.8 mmHg; p = 0.2767) and msSBP (aliskiren vs placebo: -7.3 vs -4.8 mmHg; p = 0.0725) were numerically greater in patients treated with aliskiren compared with those treated with placebo; however, this difference was not statistically significant. The proportion of diastolic responders (aliskiren and placebo: 68.5% and 72.9%, respectively; p = 0.8482) and patients achieving BP control (aliskiren and placebo: 16.0% and 16.4%, respectively; p = 0.7511) were similar for both groups. Overall, 63 (34%) and 59 (33%) patients in the aliskiren and placebo groups, respectively, experienced adverse events (AEs). The most commonly reported AEs were headache (placebo group: 6.1%) and dizziness (aliskiren group: 4.4%). Aliskiren was well tolerated.
The reductions in BP with aliskiren added to valsartan/HCT in this study were numerically greater compared with placebo added to valsartan/HCT, although not statistically significant.
高血压常与糖尿病并存,导致心血管风险增加。因此,降低此类难以治疗患者的血压对降低发病率和死亡率至关重要。
本研究旨在评估在联合使用缬沙坦和氢氯噻嗪(HCT)治疗效果不佳的高血压合并糖尿病患者中,阿利克仑的疗效和安全性。
经过 1 至 4 周的洗脱期后,平均坐位舒张压(msDBP)≥95mmHg 的患者先接受缬沙坦 160mg 治疗 2 周,然后再接受缬沙坦/HCT 160mg/25mg 治疗 4 周(单盲活性导入期)。活性导入期后 msDBP 仍≥85mmHg 的患者随机(1:1)接受阿利克仑 150mg(n=184)或安慰剂(n=179)作为附加治疗,为期 6 周。然后,阿利克仑强制滴定至每日 300mg,再治疗 6 周。疗效变量为:从基线到第 12 周终点时 msDBP 和平均坐位收缩压(msSBP)的变化、舒张压反应(msDBP<80mmHg 或降低至少 10mmHg)和血压控制率(<130/80mmHg)。
在 363 名随机患者中,328 名(90.4%)完成了研究(阿利克仑组和安慰剂组分别为 89.7%和 91.1%)。在第 12 周终点时,与安慰剂组相比,接受阿利克仑治疗的患者的最小二乘均值(LSM)msDBP (阿利克仑 vs 安慰剂:-5.8 对-4.8mmHg;p=0.2767)和 msSBP(阿利克仑 vs 安慰剂:-7.3 对-4.8mmHg;p=0.0725)变化更大,但这种差异无统计学意义。舒张压反应者(阿利克仑和安慰剂:68.5%和 72.9%;p=0.8482)和血压控制者(阿利克仑和安慰剂:16.0%和 16.4%;p=0.7511)的比例在两组之间相似。在阿利克仑组和安慰剂组中,分别有 63(34%)和 59(33%)名患者出现不良事件(AE)。最常报告的 AE 是头痛(安慰剂组:6.1%)和头晕(阿利克仑组:4.4%)。阿利克仑耐受性良好。
与安慰剂添加到缬沙坦/HCT 相比,阿利克仑添加到缬沙坦/HCT 治疗可使血压降低,但差异无统计学意义。