• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于实践的研究网络中哮喘干预措施的比较效果。

Comparative effectiveness of asthma interventions within a practice based research network.

机构信息

Department of Family Medicine, Carolinas HealthCare System, 2001 Vail Avenue, Charlotte, NC 28207, USA.

出版信息

BMC Health Serv Res. 2011 Aug 16;11:188. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-11-188.

DOI:10.1186/1472-6963-11-188
PMID:21846401
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3176175/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Asthma is a chronic lung disease that affects more than 23 million people in the United States, including 7 million children. Asthma is a difficult to manage chronic condition associated with disparities in health outcomes, poor medical compliance, and high healthcare costs. The research network coordinating this project includes hospitals, urgent care centers, and outpatient clinics within Carolinas Healthcare System that share a common electronic medical record and billing system allowing for rapid collection of clinical and demographic data. This study investigates the impact of three interventions on clinical outcomes for patients with asthma. Interventions are: an integrated approach to care that incorporates asthma management based on the chronic care model; a shared decision making intervention for asthma patients in underserved or disadvantaged populations; and a school based care approach that examines the efficacy of school-based programs to impact asthma outcomes including effectiveness of linkages between schools and the healthcare providers.

METHODS/DESIGN: This study will include 95 Practices, 171 schools, and over 30,000 asthmatic patients. Five groups (A-E) will be evaluated to determine the effectiveness of three interventions. Group A is the usual care control group without electronic medical record (EMR). Group B practices are a second control group that has an EMR with decision support, asthma action plans, and population reports at baseline. A time delay design during year one converts practices in Group B to group C after receiving the integrated approach to care intervention. Four practices within Group C will receive the shared decision making intervention (and become group D). Group E will receive a school based care intervention through case management within the schools. A centralized database will be created with the goal of facilitating comparative effectiveness research on asthma outcomes specifically for this study. Patient and community level analysis will include results from patient surveys, focus groups, and asthma patient density mapping. Community variables such as income and housing density will be mapped for comparison. Outcomes to be measured are reduced hospitalizations and emergency department visits; improved adherence to medication; improved quality of life; reduced school absenteeism; improved self-efficacy and improved school performance.

DISCUSSION

Identifying new mechanisms that improve the delivery of asthma care is an important step towards advancing patient outcomes, avoiding preventable Emergency Department visits and hospitalizations, while simultaneously reducing overall healthcare costs.

摘要

背景

哮喘是一种影响美国超过 2300 万人(包括 700 万儿童)的慢性肺部疾病。哮喘是一种难以控制的慢性疾病,与健康结果的差异、医疗依从性差和医疗保健费用高有关。协调这个项目的研究网络包括卡罗来纳医疗保健系统内的医院、紧急护理中心和门诊诊所,这些机构拥有共同的电子病历和计费系统,能够快速收集临床和人口统计数据。本研究调查了三种干预措施对哮喘患者临床结果的影响。干预措施包括:基于慢性病管理模式的综合护理方法;为服务不足或处于不利地位的人群中的哮喘患者提供共同决策干预;以及以学校为基础的护理方法,研究学校为基础的项目对哮喘结果的影响,包括学校与医疗保健提供者之间联系的有效性。

方法/设计:这项研究将包括 95 个实践、171 所学校和超过 30000 名哮喘患者。将评估五个组(A-E),以确定三种干预措施的有效性。组 A 是没有电子病历(EMR)的常规护理对照组。组 B 实践是基线时具有电子病历、决策支持、哮喘行动计划和人群报告的第二个对照组。在第一年期间采用时间延迟设计,在收到综合护理方法干预后,将组 B 中的实践转换为组 C。组 C 中的四个实践将接受共同决策干预(成为组 D)。组 E 将通过学校内的病例管理接受基于学校的护理干预。将创建一个集中式数据库,目的是促进针对哮喘结果的比较有效性研究,特别是针对这项研究。患者和社区层面的分析将包括患者调查、焦点小组和哮喘患者密度图的结果。将为比较绘制社区变量,如收入和住房密度。要测量的结果是减少住院和急诊就诊次数;提高药物依从性;提高生活质量;减少学校缺勤率;提高自我效能感和提高学校表现。

讨论

确定改善哮喘护理提供的新机制是朝着改善患者结果、避免可预防的急诊就诊和住院治疗、同时降低整体医疗保健成本的重要一步。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b831/3176175/a259b1e9dc01/1472-6963-11-188-4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b831/3176175/3043d7d3c294/1472-6963-11-188-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b831/3176175/a1098938187a/1472-6963-11-188-2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b831/3176175/9eec67d39ea5/1472-6963-11-188-3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b831/3176175/a259b1e9dc01/1472-6963-11-188-4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b831/3176175/3043d7d3c294/1472-6963-11-188-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b831/3176175/a1098938187a/1472-6963-11-188-2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b831/3176175/9eec67d39ea5/1472-6963-11-188-3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b831/3176175/a259b1e9dc01/1472-6963-11-188-4.jpg

相似文献

1
Comparative effectiveness of asthma interventions within a practice based research network.基于实践的研究网络中哮喘干预措施的比较效果。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2011 Aug 16;11:188. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-11-188.
2
The effectiveness of school-based family asthma educational programs on the quality of life and number of asthma exacerbations of children aged five to 18 years diagnosed with asthma: a systematic review protocol.以学校为基础的家庭哮喘教育项目对5至18岁确诊哮喘儿童生活质量和哮喘发作次数的有效性:一项系统评价方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Oct;13(10):69-81. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-2335.
3
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
4
5
6
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
7
Improving asthma-related health outcomes among low-income, multiethnic, school-aged children: results of a demonstration project that combined continuous quality improvement and community health worker strategies.改善低收入、多民族学龄儿童的哮喘相关健康结局:一项结合持续质量改进和社区卫生工作者策略的示范项目结果
Pediatrics. 2007 Oct;120(4):e902-11. doi: 10.1542/peds.2006-1805.
8
Caseworker-assigned discharge plans to prevent hospital readmission for acute exacerbations in children with chronic respiratory illness.个案工作者制定的出院计划,以预防慢性呼吸道疾病患儿急性加重后的再次入院。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Nov 2;11(11):CD012315. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012315.pub2.
9
Behavioural interventions for type 2 diabetes: an evidence-based analysis.2型糖尿病的行为干预:一项基于证据的分析。
Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2009;9(21):1-45. Epub 2009 Oct 1.
10
A process for developing community consensus regarding the diagnosis and management of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder.一个就注意力缺陷/多动障碍的诊断和管理达成社区共识的过程。
Pediatrics. 2005 Jan;115(1):e97-104. doi: 10.1542/peds.2004-0953.

引用本文的文献

1
Education support services for improving school engagement and academic performance of children and adolescents with a chronic health condition.改善患有慢性病的儿童和青少年的学校参与度和学业成绩的教育支持服务。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Feb 8;2(2):CD011538. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011538.pub2.
2
Research nurses as practice facilitators to disseminate an asthma shared decision making intervention.研究护士作为实践促进者来传播哮喘共同决策干预措施。
BMC Nurs. 2020 May 18;19:40. doi: 10.1186/s12912-020-00414-0. eCollection 2020.
3
Asthma dissemination around patient-centered treatments in North Carolina (ADAPT-NC): a cluster randomized control trial evaluating dissemination of an evidence-based shared decision-making intervention for asthma management.

本文引用的文献

1
Validation of an electronic version of the Mini Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire.《Mini 哮喘生活质量问卷》电子版的验证。
Respir Med. 2010 May;104(5):658-67. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2009.11.017. Epub 2010 Mar 11.
2
Regular treatment with formoterol and an inhaled corticosteroid versus regular treatment with salmeterol and an inhaled corticosteroid for chronic asthma: serious adverse events.福莫特罗与吸入性糖皮质激素联合常规治疗与沙美特罗与吸入性糖皮质激素联合常规治疗慢性哮喘的严重不良事件比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010 Jan 20(1):CD007694. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007694.pub2.
3
Shared treatment decision making improves adherence and outcomes in poorly controlled asthma.
北卡罗来纳州以患者为中心的哮喘治疗传播研究(ADAPT-NC):一项整群随机对照试验,评估基于证据的哮喘管理共同决策干预措施的传播情况。
J Asthma. 2019 Oct;56(10):1087-1098. doi: 10.1080/02770903.2018.1514630. Epub 2018 Sep 25.
4
Measuring Team Effectiveness in the Health Care Setting: An Inventory of Survey Tools.衡量医疗环境中的团队效能:调查工具清单
Health Serv Insights. 2018 Aug 24;11:1178632918796230. doi: 10.1177/1178632918796230. eCollection 2018.
5
Patient and Family Engagement in the Design of a Mobile Health Solution for Pediatric Asthma: Development and Feasibility Study.患者及家属参与儿科哮喘移动健康解决方案的设计:开发与可行性研究
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2018 Mar 22;6(3):e68. doi: 10.2196/mhealth.8849.
6
Shared decision-making for people with asthma.哮喘患者的共同决策
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Oct 3;10(10):CD012330. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012330.pub2.
7
Shared decision making and time to exacerbation in children with asthma.哮喘儿童的共同决策与病情加重时间
J Asthma. 2018 Sep;55(9):949-955. doi: 10.1080/02770903.2017.1378357. Epub 2017 Oct 20.
8
Impact of shared decision making on asthma quality of life and asthma control among children.共同决策对儿童哮喘生活质量和哮喘控制的影响。
J Asthma. 2018 Jun;55(6):675-683. doi: 10.1080/02770903.2017.1362423. Epub 2017 Oct 11.
9
Asthma education for school staff.面向学校工作人员的哮喘教育。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Apr 12;4(4):CD012255. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012255.pub2.
10
Patient perspectives on engagement in shared decision-making for asthma care.患者对参与哮喘护理共同决策的看法。
Fam Pract. 2017 Jun 1;34(3):353-357. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmw122.
共同制定治疗决策可改善控制不佳的哮喘患者的依从性和结局。
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2010 Mar 15;181(6):566-77. doi: 10.1164/rccm.200906-0907OC. Epub 2009 Dec 17.
4
The role of inhaled corticosteroids and montelukast in children with mild-moderate asthma: results of a systematic review with meta-analysis.吸入性皮质类固醇和孟鲁司特在轻中度哮喘儿童中的作用:系统评价和荟萃分析的结果。
Arch Dis Child. 2010 May;95(5):365-70. doi: 10.1136/adc.2009.169177. Epub 2009 Nov 27.
5
Role and structure of the North Carolina Physician Advisory Group: a collaborative effort between providers and Medicaid.北卡罗来纳州医师咨询小组的角色与结构:提供者与医疗补助计划之间的合作成果
N C Med J. 2009 May-Jun;70(3):270-3.
6
One size does not fit all: tailoring case management to a community.一刀切并不适用于所有情况:为社区量身定制个案管理。
N C Med J. 2009 May-Jun;70(3):241-4.
7
The prevalence of nonadherence in difficult asthma.重度哮喘患者治疗依从性差的患病率
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2009 Nov 1;180(9):817-22. doi: 10.1164/rccm.200902-0166OC. Epub 2009 Jul 30.
8
Comparative effectiveness research: a report from the Institute of Medicine.比较效果研究:医学研究所的一份报告。
Ann Intern Med. 2009 Aug 4;151(3):203-5. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-151-3-200908040-00125. Epub 2009 Jun 30.
9
Combination formoterol and inhaled steroid versus beta2-agonist as relief medication for chronic asthma in adults and children.福莫特罗与吸入性类固醇联合用药与β2受体激动剂作为成人和儿童慢性哮喘缓解药物的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009 Jan 21;2009(1):CD007085. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007085.pub2.
10
Safety of regular use of long-acting beta agonists as monotherapy or added to inhaled corticosteroids in asthma. A systematic review.长期使用长效β受体激动剂作为单一疗法或添加到吸入性糖皮质激素中治疗哮喘的安全性。一项系统评价。
Pulm Pharmacol Ther. 2009 Feb;22(1):9-19. doi: 10.1016/j.pupt.2008.10.008. Epub 2008 Nov 5.