• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

对弯曲根管根尖三分之一区域玷污层去除的定性分析:传统冲洗与动度系统的比较。

Qualitative analysis of the removal of the smear layer in the apical third of curved roots: conventional irrigation versus activation systems.

机构信息

Department of Restorative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.

出版信息

J Endod. 2011 Sep;37(9):1268-71. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2011.06.009. Epub 2011 Jul 16.

DOI:10.1016/j.joen.2011.06.009
PMID:21846545
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of different irrigant agitation techniques on smear layer removal in curved root canals.

METHODS

Mesiobuccal canals of 62 extracted lower molars with a curvature of 33 degrees were used and instrumented up to ProTaper F2. The samples were divided into 3 experimental groups according to the final irrigation: conventional irrigation, ultrasonic irrigation, and sonic irrigation by using the EndoActivator system. The control group was composed of 2 specimens without any final irrigation. In all of the experimental groups, 5 mL of 17% ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid was used for 1 minute, and 5 mL of 2.5% NaOCl was used for 30 seconds. The analysis of the apical region was performed via scanning electron microscopy by 3 examiners. The data were submitted to the Kruskal-Wallis and Dunn tests (P < .05).

RESULTS

The activation systems removed significantly more smear layer than did conventional irrigation.

CONCLUSIONS

Sonic and ultrasonic irrigation resulted in better removal of the smear layer in the apical third of curved root canals than did conventional irrigation.

摘要

简介

本研究旨在评估不同冲洗液搅拌技术对弯曲根管内玷污层去除的效果。

方法

使用 62 颗具有 33 度弯曲度的下颌磨牙近中颊根管,并采用 ProTaper F2 器械进行根管预备。根据最终冲洗液将样本分为 3 个实验组:常规冲洗、超声冲洗和使用 EndoActivator 系统的声冲洗。对照组由 2 个未进行任何最终冲洗的样本组成。在所有实验组中,使用 17%乙二胺四乙酸 5 毫升冲洗 1 分钟,使用 2.5%次氯酸钠冲洗 30 秒。通过 3 位检查者的扫描电子显微镜对根尖区域进行分析。数据采用 Kruskal-Wallis 和 Dunn 检验(P<.05)。

结果

活化系统去除的玷污层明显多于常规冲洗。

结论

与常规冲洗相比,超声和声冲洗在弯曲根管的根尖三分之一处能更好地去除玷污层。

相似文献

1
Qualitative analysis of the removal of the smear layer in the apical third of curved roots: conventional irrigation versus activation systems.对弯曲根管根尖三分之一区域玷污层去除的定性分析:传统冲洗与动度系统的比较。
J Endod. 2011 Sep;37(9):1268-71. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2011.06.009. Epub 2011 Jul 16.
2
Effectiveness of different final irrigant activation protocols on smear layer removal in curved canals.不同终末冲洗液激活方案对弯曲根管内玷污层去除效果的影响。
J Endod. 2010 Aug;36(8):1361-6. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2010.03.037. Epub 2010 May 13.
3
Smear layer removal and canal cleanliness using different irrigation systems (EndoActivator, EndoVac, and passive ultrasonic irrigation): field emission scanning electron microscopic evaluation in an in vitro study.使用不同冲洗系统(EndoActivator、EndoVac和被动超声冲洗)去除玷污层和清洁根管:一项体外研究的场发射扫描电子显微镜评估
J Endod. 2013 Nov;39(11):1456-60. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2013.07.028. Epub 2013 Sep 6.
4
Effectiveness of different irrigant agitation techniques on debris and smear layer removal in curved root canals: a scanning electron microscopy study.不同冲洗液搅拌技术对弯曲根管内碎屑和玷污层去除效果的扫描电镜研究。
J Endod. 2010 Dec;36(12):1983-7. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2010.08.056. Epub 2010 Oct 18.
5
Root canal debridement efficacy of different final irrigation protocols.不同根管冲洗方案的根管清创效果。
Int Endod J. 2012 Oct;45(10):898-906. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2012.02046.x. Epub 2012 Apr 6.
6
Efficacy of different final irrigation activation techniques on smear layer removal.不同终末冲洗激活技术对清除玷污层效果的影响。
J Endod. 2011 Sep;37(9):1272-5. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2011.06.007. Epub 2011 Jul 16.
7
Effect of passive ultrasonic irrigation and manual dynamic irrigation on smear layer removal from root canals in a closed apex in vitro model.被动超声冲洗和手动动态冲洗对体外封闭根尖根管内玷污层去除效果的影响
J Investig Clin Dent. 2014 Aug;5(3):188-93. doi: 10.1111/jicd.12033. Epub 2013 Apr 17.
8
A quantitative and qualitative analysis of ultrasonic versus sonic endodontic systems on canal cleanliness and obturation.超声与声波牙髓治疗系统对根管清洁度和充填效果的定量与定性分析
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2011 Dec;112(6):809-13. doi: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2011.06.002. Epub 2011 Sep 9.
9
Cleaning efficacy using two engine-driven systems versus manual instrumentation in curved root canals: a scanning electron microscopic study.两种机动系统与手动器械在弯曲根管中清洁效果的比较:扫描电子显微镜研究。
J Endod. 2011 Sep;37(9):1279-82. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2011.05.036. Epub 2011 Jul 20.
10
Effectiveness of the EndoActivator System in removing the smear layer after root canal instrumentation.根管器械预备后 EndoActivator 系统清除玷污层的效果。
J Endod. 2010 Feb;36(2):308-11. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2009.10.029. Epub 2009 Dec 14.

引用本文的文献

1
The effect of supplementary methods on root canal cleaning: a study using 3D-printed mandibular molar models.辅助方法对根管清理的影响:一项使用3D打印下颌磨牙模型的研究。
Odontology. 2025 May 2. doi: 10.1007/s10266-025-01116-2.
2
Dentinal tubule penetration of a silicone-based endodontic sealer following N-acetyl cysteine intracanal medicament removal using ultrasonic agitation and laser activated irrigation - An study.使用超声振荡和激光激活冲洗去除N-乙酰半胱氨酸根管内药物后硅基根管封闭剂对牙本质小管的渗透——一项研究
J Conserv Dent Endod. 2025 Mar;28(3):231-236. doi: 10.4103/JCDE.JCDE_842_24. Epub 2025 Mar 3.
3
Real-Time Analysis of Changes in Internal and External Root Temperatures Using Different Systems for Activating the Irrigation Solution.
使用不同系统激活冲洗液时内外牙根温度变化的实时分析
Int J Dent. 2025 Apr 4;2025:3385512. doi: 10.1155/ijod/3385512. eCollection 2025.
4
The Effectiveness of Triton Used With XP-3D Adaptive Files and Active Irrigation on Smear Layer Removal During Root Canal Preparation: A Qualitative Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) Study.使用Triton与XP - 3D自适应锉及主动冲洗在根管预备过程中去除玷污层的效果:一项定性扫描电子显微镜(SEM)研究
Cureus. 2024 Nov 5;16(11):e73057. doi: 10.7759/cureus.73057. eCollection 2024 Nov.
5
The effect of final irrigation with different solutions on smear layer removal and dentin erosion: A scanning electron microscope study.不同冲洗液终末冲洗对玷污层去除和牙本质脱矿的影响:扫描电镜研究。
PLoS One. 2024 Aug 9;19(8):e0308606. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0308606. eCollection 2024.
6
Antibacterial ability of different activated irrigation after root canal preparation: intratubular analyses.不同根管预备后冲洗液的抗菌能力:管内分析。
Braz Dent J. 2024 May 10;35:e245883. doi: 10.1590/0103-6440202405883. eCollection 2024.
7
Debris and Smear Layer Removal in Curved Root Canals: A Comparative Study of Ultrasonic and Sonic Irrigant Activation Techniques.弯曲根管内碎屑和玷污层的去除:超声和声波冲洗激活技术的比较研究
Dent J (Basel). 2024 Feb 26;12(3):51. doi: 10.3390/dj12030051.
8
Comparison of Easydo Activator, ultrasonic and needle irrigation techniques on sealer penetration and smear layer removal in vitro.比较 Easydo 激活器、超声和针头冲洗技术对体外封闭剂渗透和玷污层去除的效果。
BMC Oral Health. 2024 Jan 9;24(1):56. doi: 10.1186/s12903-023-03833-y.
9
Root Fracture Resistance of Maxillary Premolars Obturated with Three Root Canal Sealers after Passive Utrasonic Irrigation: An study.被动超声冲洗后用三种根管封闭剂充填的上颌前磨牙的牙根抗折性:一项研究。
Iran Endod J. 2020 Summer;15(3):166-172. doi: 10.22037/iej.v15i3.26426.
10
Effectiveness of Different Irrigant Activation Systems on Smear Layer Removal: A Scanning Electron Microscopic Study.不同冲洗液激活系统对玷污层去除效果的扫描电子显微镜研究
J Clin Med. 2022 Feb 15;11(4):1003. doi: 10.3390/jcm11041003.