• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

根管器械预备后 EndoActivator 系统清除玷污层的效果。

Effectiveness of the EndoActivator System in removing the smear layer after root canal instrumentation.

机构信息

Department of Dental Pathology and Therapeutics, School of Dentistry, University of Granada, Granada, Spain.

出版信息

J Endod. 2010 Feb;36(2):308-11. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2009.10.029. Epub 2009 Dec 14.

DOI:10.1016/j.joen.2009.10.029
PMID:20113797
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Elimination of the smear layer after root canal instrumentation requires the use of irrigating solutions. This cleaning can be completed with passive ultrasonic or sonic irrigation. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of the EndoActivator System in removing the smear layer after rotary root canal instrumentation, with and without a final flush of 17% ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) solution, in coronal, middle, and apical thirds.

METHODS

Forty single-canal teeth were decoronated and randomly divided into 4 groups (n = 10). The groups were instrumented by using Mtwo System. EndoActivator was used with a final rinse of 1 mL of 17% EDTA or 4% NaOCl for 1 minute. The roots were longitudinally split and were grooved in the coronal, middle, and apical thirds. Scanning electron microscopy digital photomicrographs at 400x were taken to evaluate the amount of smear layer in each third.

RESULTS

The NaOCl/EndoActivator group did not remove any smear layer of the root canal wall (100% in the coronal, middle, and apical thirds). In the groups that used 17% EDTA (with or without EndoActivator), the smear layer was eliminated completely (100%) in the coronal third, but the amount of removal was less in the other two thirds. The comparisons between NaOCl versus NaOCl/EndoActivator groups and EDTA/NaOCl versus EDTA/EndoActivator/NaOCl groups showed no significant differences in root canal thirds.

CONCLUSIONS

The EndoActivator System did not enhance the removal of smear layer as compared with conventional Max-I-Probe irrigation with NaOCl and EDTA.

摘要

简介

根管器械预备后,消除玷污层需要使用冲洗液。这种清洁可以通过被动超声或超声冲洗来完成。本研究旨在评估在旋转根管器械预备后,EndoActivator 系统在有无 17%乙二胺四乙酸(EDTA)溶液终冲洗的情况下,在根管冠、中、根尖三分之一处去除玷污层的效果。

方法

40 颗单根管牙被去冠并随机分为 4 组(n = 10)。使用 Mtwo 系统对每组进行器械预备。使用 EndoActivator 并用 1 毫升 17% EDTA 或 4% NaOCl 进行最终冲洗 1 分钟。将根纵向劈开,在根管冠、中、根尖三分之一处开槽。在 400x 下拍摄扫描电子显微镜数码照片,以评估每个三分之一处的玷污层量。

结果

NaOCl/EndoActivator 组未去除根管壁的任何玷污层(根管冠、中、根尖三分之一均为 100%)。在使用 17% EDTA 的组(有无 EndoActivator)中,根管冠三分之一的玷污层完全去除(100%),但其他两个三分之一的去除量较少。NaOCl 与 NaOCl/EndoActivator 组和 EDTA/NaOCl 与 EDTA/EndoActivator/NaOCl 组之间的比较显示,根管三分之一处无显著差异。

结论

与常规 Max-I-Probe 冲洗联合 NaOCl 和 EDTA 相比,EndoActivator 系统对玷污层的去除效果没有增强。

相似文献

1
Effectiveness of the EndoActivator System in removing the smear layer after root canal instrumentation.根管器械预备后 EndoActivator 系统清除玷污层的效果。
J Endod. 2010 Feb;36(2):308-11. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2009.10.029. Epub 2009 Dec 14.
2
Effectiveness of different final irrigant activation protocols on smear layer removal in curved canals.不同终末冲洗液激活方案对弯曲根管内玷污层去除效果的影响。
J Endod. 2010 Aug;36(8):1361-6. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2010.03.037. Epub 2010 May 13.
3
Comparison of the efficacy of maleic acid and ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid in smear layer removal from instrumented human root canal: a scanning electron microscopic study.比较马来酸和乙二胺四乙酸在去除器械处理人根管内玷污层的效果:扫描电镜研究。
J Endod. 2009 Nov;35(11):1573-6. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2009.07.021. Epub 2009 Sep 20.
4
The effectiveness of different acid irrigating solutions in root canal cleaning after hand and rotary instrumentation.手动和旋转器械预备后不同酸冲洗液在根管清洁中的效果
J Endod. 2006 Oct;32(10):993-7. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2006.05.016. Epub 2006 Jul 26.
5
Scanning electron microscopic evaluation of debris and smear layer remaining following use of ProTaper and Hero Shaper instruments in combination with NaOCl and EDTA irrigation.使用ProTaper和Hero Shaper器械联合次氯酸钠(NaOCl)和乙二胺四乙酸(EDTA)冲洗后残留碎屑和玷污层的扫描电子显微镜评估
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2008 Oct;106(4):e63-71. doi: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2008.04.032. Epub 2008 Aug 13.
6
Root canal debridement efficacy of different final irrigation protocols.不同根管冲洗方案的根管清创效果。
Int Endod J. 2012 Oct;45(10):898-906. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2012.02046.x. Epub 2012 Apr 6.
7
Effectiveness of ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) and MTAD on debris and smear layer removal using a self-adjusting file.使用自调式锉时乙二胺四乙酸(EDTA)和MTAD去除碎屑及玷污层的效果
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2011 Dec;112(6):803-8. doi: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2011.05.038. Epub 2011 Aug 27.
8
A scanning electron microscopic evaluation of root canal wall cleanliness after calcium hydroxide removal using three irrigation regimens.使用三种冲洗方案去除氢氧化钙后根管壁清洁度的扫描电子显微镜评估。
J Contemp Dent Pract. 2007 Jan 1;8(1):11-8.
9
A comparative scanning electron microscopic investigation of the smear layer after the use of sodium hypochlorite gel and solution forms as root canal irrigants.次氯酸钠凝胶和溶液形式作为根管冲洗剂使用后对玷污层的比较扫描电子显微镜研究。
J Endod. 2010 Jul;36(7):1234-7. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2010.02.033. Epub 2010 Apr 10.
10
The effect of application time of EDTA and NaOCl on intracanal smear layer removal: an SEM analysis.乙二胺四乙酸(EDTA)和次氯酸钠(NaOCl)应用时间对根管内玷污层去除的影响:扫描电子显微镜分析
Int Endod J. 2005 May;38(5):285-90. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2005.00930.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluation of Root Canal Cleaning and Irrigant Penetration Using Different Irrigation Protocols: A Combined SEM and Single-Tooth Micro-CT Study.使用不同冲洗方案评估根管清理和冲洗剂渗透:扫描电子显微镜和单颗牙显微计算机断层扫描联合研究
Clin Exp Dent Res. 2025 Aug;11(4):e70175. doi: 10.1002/cre2.70175.
2
Comparative analysis of dentinal tubule penetration: effects of irrigation activation methods and root canal sealers: in-vitro study.牙本质小管渗透的比较分析:冲洗激活方法和根管封闭剂的影响:体外研究
BMC Oral Health. 2025 Jul 2;25(1):991. doi: 10.1186/s12903-025-06419-y.
3
Unique root anatomy of mandibular second premolars: clinical strategies for effective disinfection and preservation of dentine structure in root canal treatment-a case report.
下颌第二前磨牙独特的根管解剖结构:根管治疗中有效消毒及保存牙本质结构的临床策略——病例报告
Front Dent Med. 2024 May 9;5:1403138. doi: 10.3389/fdmed.2024.1403138. eCollection 2024.
4
Effectiveness of XP-Endo Finisher, Endoactivator, and PUI agitation in the penetration of intracanal medicaments into dentinal tubules: A confocal laser scanning microscope analysis.XP根充锉、根管激活仪和被动超声冲洗在根管内药物渗入牙本质小管中的效果:共聚焦激光扫描显微镜分析
J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects. 2024 Summer;18(3):196-203. doi: 10.34172/joddd.41123. Epub 2024 Sep 7.
5
Impact of passive ultrasonic irrigation on the outcome of non-surgical root canal treatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.被动超声冲洗对非手术根管治疗效果的影响:一项随机临床试验的系统评价和荟萃分析
Evid Based Dent. 2024 Dec;25(4):212-213. doi: 10.1038/s41432-024-01033-3. Epub 2024 Jun 29.
6
Debris and Smear Layer Removal in Curved Root Canals: A Comparative Study of Ultrasonic and Sonic Irrigant Activation Techniques.弯曲根管内碎屑和玷污层的去除:超声和声波冲洗激活技术的比较研究
Dent J (Basel). 2024 Feb 26;12(3):51. doi: 10.3390/dj12030051.
7
Evaluation of Different Agitation Techniques on Smear Layer Formation and Dentine Erosions- An In Vitro Study.不同搅拌技术对牙本质玷污层形成和牙本质侵蚀的评价——一项体外研究。
Eur Endod J. 2023 Jan;8(1):72-78. doi: 10.14744/eej.2022.55477.
8
Effectiveness of Different Irrigant Activation Systems on Smear Layer Removal: A Scanning Electron Microscopic Study.不同冲洗液激活系统对玷污层去除效果的扫描电子显微镜研究
J Clin Med. 2022 Feb 15;11(4):1003. doi: 10.3390/jcm11041003.
9
The Sealer Penetration into the Dentinal Tubules: An Appraisal of Different Irrigation Systems: Original Research.封闭剂渗入牙本质小管:不同冲洗系统的评估:原创研究
J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2021 Nov;13(Suppl 2):S1280-S1285. doi: 10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_95_21. Epub 2021 Nov 10.
10
A Comparative Evaluation of Smear Layer Removal Using Erbium:YAG Laser-Activated Irrigation, Sonic Irrigation, and Manual Dynamic Irrigation: A Scanning Electron Microscope Study.使用铒激光激活冲洗、声波冲洗和手动动态冲洗去除玷污层的比较评估:一项扫描电子显微镜研究
J Lasers Med Sci. 2021 Jun 9;12:e22. doi: 10.34172/jlms.2021.22. eCollection 2021.