Suppr超能文献

关于在日本患者巩膜瓣下植入Ex-PRESS青光眼引流装置的中期结果的首次报告。

The first report on intermediate-term outcome of Ex-PRESS glaucoma filtration device implanted under scleral flap in Japanese patients.

作者信息

Sugiyama Tetsuya, Shibata Maho, Kojima Shota, Ueki Mari, Ikeda Tsunehiko

机构信息

Department of Ophthalmology, Osaka Medical College, Takatsuki, Osaka, Japan.

出版信息

Clin Ophthalmol. 2011;5:1063-6. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S23129. Epub 2011 Jul 29.

Abstract

PURPOSE

This paper compares the outcomes of the Ex-PRESS(®) Glaucoma Filtration Device (Alcon, Fort Worth, TX) implant observed in Japanese patients for 1 year with those of patients undergoing trabeculectomy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The subjects comprised ten eyes of ten cases with open-angle glaucoma for which filtration surgery using Ex-PRESS (P-50) was performed by one operator from February 2008 and observed for at least 1 year (Ex-PRESS Group), and eleven eyes of eleven cases for which trabeculectomy was performed by the same operator (TE Group). For both groups, mitomycin C was used and a scleral flap was created after a fornix-based incision of the conjunctiva.

RESULTS

Hypotony and choroidal detachment were observed as early postoperative complications during a 1-week period in one-third of the cases in the TE Group, and failing vision in about 45%, while these were seen in fewer cases in the Ex-PRESS Group. No significant difference in intraocular pressure (IOP) was observed during the period, but IOP variations on the day following the surgery were obviously narrower in the Ex-PRESS Group than in the TE Group. Visual acuity was significantly poorer from 1 week to 3 months in the TE Group while it was stable in the Ex-PRESS Group. The Ex-PRESS Group had fewer cases of laser suture lysis and fewer administrations of glaucoma eyedrop, and no cases of progression in the stage of visual field defect.

CONCLUSION

Filtration surgery using the Ex-PRESS is unlikely to cause early complications in Japanese patients. Similarly to the trabeculectomy, the intermediate-term control of IOP showed favorable results.

摘要

目的

本文比较了日本患者植入Ex-PRESS(®)青光眼滤过装置(爱尔康公司,沃思堡,得克萨斯州)1年的观察结果与接受小梁切除术患者的结果。

患者与方法

研究对象包括2008年2月至2008年12月期间由同一位手术医生为10例开角型青光眼患者行Ex-PRESS(P-50)滤过手术,并至少随访观察1年的10只眼(Ex-PRESS组),以及同一位手术医生为11例患者行小梁切除术的11只眼(小梁切除术组)。两组均使用丝裂霉素C,并在结膜穹窿部切口后制作巩膜瓣。

结果

小梁切除术组三分之一的病例在术后1周内出现低眼压和脉络膜脱离等早期并发症,约45%的病例视力下降,而Ex-PRESS组出现这些情况的病例较少。在此期间,两组眼压(IOP)无显著差异,但Ex-PRESS组术后第一天的眼压波动明显小于小梁切除术组。小梁切除术组术后1周~3个月视力明显较差,而Ex-PRESS组视力稳定。Ex-PRESS组激光缝线松解病例较少,青光眼滴眼液使用次数较少,且无视野缺损进展病例。

结论

在日本患者中,使用Ex-PRESS进行滤过手术不太可能引起早期并发症。与小梁切除术一样,眼压的中期控制效果良好。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验