Suppr超能文献

3 岁以下儿童的乳糜泻筛查检测:三种血清学检测的表现。

Celiac disease screening assays for children younger than 3 years of age: the performance of three serological tests.

机构信息

Institute of Gastroenterology, Nutrition, and Liver Disease, Schneider Children's Medical Center of Israel, 14 Kaplan St, 49202 Petach Tikva, Israel.

出版信息

Dig Dis Sci. 2012 Jan;57(1):127-32. doi: 10.1007/s10620-011-1857-x. Epub 2011 Aug 17.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

The optimum serological test for celiac disease (CD) in young children is not known. The objective of our study was to compare the performance of three serological tests (IgA + IgG DGP, IgA TTG, and IgA + IgG EMA) for children younger than 3 years of age.

METHODS

We identified all subjects younger than 3 years of age (n = 6,074) that were tested for CD serology and included those with biopsy data. Patients were classified as group 1 (n = 47): patients with confirmed CD or group 2 (n = 12): patients with normal biopsy findings.

RESULTS

There was statistically significant difference between group 1 and group 2 with regard to number of patients with positive IgA TTG (97.87% vs. 50%, P < 0.001), IgA + IgG DGP (100% vs. 77.78%, P = 0.007), and IgA + IgG EMA (95.65% vs. 9.09%, P < 0.001). There was a significantly positive correlation between Marsh-Oberhuber score on the small duodenal biopsies and all tests. Analysis of sensitivity and specificity showed that manufacturer's levels had high sensitivity for all tests (IgA TTG 97%, IgA + IgG DGP 100%, IgA + IgG EMA 96%), however specificity was low for IgA + IgG DGP (44%) and IgA TTG (50%) but not for IgA + IgG EMA (91%).

CONCLUSIONS

For children younger than 3 years of age, IgA + IgG EMA is highly sensitive and specific. Use of IgA + IgG DGP or IgA TTG as a single serological marker is insufficient for definite diagnosis of CD in this age group. Based on our results, it might be reasonable to postpone the biopsy for asymptomatic children with negative EMA.

摘要

背景与目的

目前尚不清楚用于诊断幼儿乳糜泻(CD)的最佳血清学检测方法。本研究旨在比较三种血清学检测方法(IgA+IgG 抗组织转谷氨酰胺酶、IgA 抗组织桥粒抗体和 IgA+IgG 抗内因子抗体)在 3 岁以下儿童中的应用。

方法

我们筛选了所有年龄在 3 岁以下且进行过 CD 血清学检测的患者,共纳入 6074 例患儿,其中有 47 例患儿接受了小肠活检,根据活检结果将患儿分为两组,组 1(n=47)为确诊 CD 患儿,组 2(n=12)为正常活检患儿。

结果

组 1 与组 2 在 IgA 抗组织桥粒抗体、IgA+IgG 抗组织转谷氨酰胺酶和 IgA+IgG 抗内因子抗体的阳性率方面有显著差异(97.87% vs. 50%,P<0.001;100% vs. 77.78%,P=0.007;95.65% vs. 9.09%,P<0.001)。小肠黏膜活检的 Marsh-Oberhuber 分级与所有检测方法均呈显著正相关。灵敏度和特异度分析显示,各检测方法的制造商设定值均具有较高的灵敏度(IgA 抗组织桥粒抗体 97%,IgA+IgG 抗组织转谷氨酰胺酶 100%,IgA+IgG 抗内因子抗体 96%),但 IgA+IgG 抗组织转谷氨酰胺酶(50%)和 IgA 抗组织桥粒抗体(44%)的特异性较低,而 IgA+IgG 抗内因子抗体(91%)的特异性较高。

结论

在 3 岁以下儿童中,IgA+IgG 抗内因子抗体的灵敏度和特异度均较高。因此,单独使用 IgA+IgG 抗组织转谷氨酰胺酶或 IgA 抗组织桥粒抗体作为血清学标志物不能明确诊断该年龄段儿童的 CD。基于本研究结果,对于无症状且 EMA 检测结果为阴性的患儿,我们可能可以合理地推迟进行小肠活检。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验