• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

3 岁以下儿童的乳糜泻筛查检测:三种血清学检测的表现。

Celiac disease screening assays for children younger than 3 years of age: the performance of three serological tests.

机构信息

Institute of Gastroenterology, Nutrition, and Liver Disease, Schneider Children's Medical Center of Israel, 14 Kaplan St, 49202 Petach Tikva, Israel.

出版信息

Dig Dis Sci. 2012 Jan;57(1):127-32. doi: 10.1007/s10620-011-1857-x. Epub 2011 Aug 17.

DOI:10.1007/s10620-011-1857-x
PMID:21847565
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

The optimum serological test for celiac disease (CD) in young children is not known. The objective of our study was to compare the performance of three serological tests (IgA + IgG DGP, IgA TTG, and IgA + IgG EMA) for children younger than 3 years of age.

METHODS

We identified all subjects younger than 3 years of age (n = 6,074) that were tested for CD serology and included those with biopsy data. Patients were classified as group 1 (n = 47): patients with confirmed CD or group 2 (n = 12): patients with normal biopsy findings.

RESULTS

There was statistically significant difference between group 1 and group 2 with regard to number of patients with positive IgA TTG (97.87% vs. 50%, P < 0.001), IgA + IgG DGP (100% vs. 77.78%, P = 0.007), and IgA + IgG EMA (95.65% vs. 9.09%, P < 0.001). There was a significantly positive correlation between Marsh-Oberhuber score on the small duodenal biopsies and all tests. Analysis of sensitivity and specificity showed that manufacturer's levels had high sensitivity for all tests (IgA TTG 97%, IgA + IgG DGP 100%, IgA + IgG EMA 96%), however specificity was low for IgA + IgG DGP (44%) and IgA TTG (50%) but not for IgA + IgG EMA (91%).

CONCLUSIONS

For children younger than 3 years of age, IgA + IgG EMA is highly sensitive and specific. Use of IgA + IgG DGP or IgA TTG as a single serological marker is insufficient for definite diagnosis of CD in this age group. Based on our results, it might be reasonable to postpone the biopsy for asymptomatic children with negative EMA.

摘要

背景与目的

目前尚不清楚用于诊断幼儿乳糜泻(CD)的最佳血清学检测方法。本研究旨在比较三种血清学检测方法(IgA+IgG 抗组织转谷氨酰胺酶、IgA 抗组织桥粒抗体和 IgA+IgG 抗内因子抗体)在 3 岁以下儿童中的应用。

方法

我们筛选了所有年龄在 3 岁以下且进行过 CD 血清学检测的患者,共纳入 6074 例患儿,其中有 47 例患儿接受了小肠活检,根据活检结果将患儿分为两组,组 1(n=47)为确诊 CD 患儿,组 2(n=12)为正常活检患儿。

结果

组 1 与组 2 在 IgA 抗组织桥粒抗体、IgA+IgG 抗组织转谷氨酰胺酶和 IgA+IgG 抗内因子抗体的阳性率方面有显著差异(97.87% vs. 50%,P<0.001;100% vs. 77.78%,P=0.007;95.65% vs. 9.09%,P<0.001)。小肠黏膜活检的 Marsh-Oberhuber 分级与所有检测方法均呈显著正相关。灵敏度和特异度分析显示,各检测方法的制造商设定值均具有较高的灵敏度(IgA 抗组织桥粒抗体 97%,IgA+IgG 抗组织转谷氨酰胺酶 100%,IgA+IgG 抗内因子抗体 96%),但 IgA+IgG 抗组织转谷氨酰胺酶(50%)和 IgA 抗组织桥粒抗体(44%)的特异性较低,而 IgA+IgG 抗内因子抗体(91%)的特异性较高。

结论

在 3 岁以下儿童中,IgA+IgG 抗内因子抗体的灵敏度和特异度均较高。因此,单独使用 IgA+IgG 抗组织转谷氨酰胺酶或 IgA 抗组织桥粒抗体作为血清学标志物不能明确诊断该年龄段儿童的 CD。基于本研究结果,对于无症状且 EMA 检测结果为阴性的患儿,我们可能可以合理地推迟进行小肠活检。

相似文献

1
Celiac disease screening assays for children younger than 3 years of age: the performance of three serological tests.3 岁以下儿童的乳糜泻筛查检测:三种血清学检测的表现。
Dig Dis Sci. 2012 Jan;57(1):127-32. doi: 10.1007/s10620-011-1857-x. Epub 2011 Aug 17.
2
Identification of Pediatric Patients With Celiac Disease Based on Serology and a Classification and Regression Tree Analysis.基于血清学及分类回归树分析对乳糜泻儿科患者的识别
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017 Mar;15(3):396-402.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2016.10.035. Epub 2016 Nov 12.
3
IgA anti-tissue transglutaminase antibodies and IgG antibodies against deamidated gliadin peptides as predictors of celiac disease.抗组织转谷氨酰胺酶IgA抗体和抗脱酰胺麦醇溶蛋白肽IgG抗体作为乳糜泻的预测指标
Arch Argent Pediatr. 2019 Feb 1;117(1):52-55. doi: 10.5546/aap.2019.eng.52.
4
Diagnostic performance of IgG anti-deamidated gliadin peptide antibody assays is comparable to IgA anti-tTG in celiac disease.IgG 抗脱酰胺麦胶蛋白肽抗体检测在乳糜泻中的诊断性能与 IgA 抗 tTG 相当。
Clin Chim Acta. 2010 Jul 4;411(13-14):931-5. doi: 10.1016/j.cca.2010.02.060. Epub 2010 Feb 19.
5
In Screening for Celiac Disease, Deamidated Gliadin Rarely Predicts Disease When Tissue Transglutaminase Is Normal.在乳糜泻的筛查中,当组织转谷氨酰胺酶正常时,脱酰胺麦胶蛋白很少能预测疾病。
J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2019 Jan;68(1):20-25. doi: 10.1097/MPG.0000000000002109.
6
Diagnostic performances of celiac disease serological tests among Saudi patients.沙特患者的腹腔疾病血清学检测的诊断性能。
Saudi J Gastroenterol. 2023 Jan-Feb;29(1):31-38. doi: 10.4103/sjg.sjg_280_22.
7
Validation of Antibody-Based Strategies for Diagnosis of Pediatric Celiac Disease Without Biopsy.基于抗体的策略在儿科乳糜泻诊断中的验证:无需活检。
Gastroenterology. 2017 Aug;153(2):410-419.e17. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2017.04.023. Epub 2017 Apr 28.
8
Diagnostic value of anti-deamidated gliadin peptide IgG antibodies for celiac disease in children and IgA-deficient patients.抗脱酰胺麦胶蛋白肽 IgG 抗体对儿童和 IgA 缺乏患者乳糜泻的诊断价值。
J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2012 Jul;55(1):50-5. doi: 10.1097/MPG.0b013e31824703c7.
9
Diagnostic utility of deamidated gliadin peptide antibody in celiac disease compared to anti-tissue transglutaminase and IgA- endomysium antibodies.与抗组织转谷氨酰胺酶抗体和IgA-肌内膜抗体相比,脱酰胺麦醇溶蛋白肽抗体在乳糜泻中的诊断效用。
Egypt J Immunol. 2012;19(2):41-52.
10
Accuracy of diagnostic antibody tests for coeliac disease in children: summary of an evidence report.儿童乳糜泻诊断性抗体检测的准确性:证据报告摘要。
J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2012 Feb;54(2):229-41. doi: 10.1097/MPG.0b013e318216f2e5.

引用本文的文献

1
Defining the optimum strategy for identifying adults and children with coeliac disease: systematic review and economic modelling.定义识别成人和儿童乳糜泻的最佳策略:系统评价和经济建模。
Health Technol Assess. 2022 Oct;26(44):1-310. doi: 10.3310/ZUCE8371.
2
Diagnostic Accuracy of IgA Anti-Transglutaminase and IgG Anti-Deamidated Gliadin for Diagnosis of Celiac Disease in Children under Two Years of Age: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.IgA 抗转谷氨酰胺酶和 IgG 抗脱酰胺麦胶蛋白诊断 2 岁以下儿童乳糜泻的准确性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Nutrients. 2021 Dec 21;14(1):7. doi: 10.3390/nu14010007.

本文引用的文献

1
Celiac disease without villous atrophy in children: a prospective study.儿童无绒毛萎缩的乳糜泻:一项前瞻性研究。
J Pediatr. 2010 Sep;157(3):373-80, 380.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2010.02.070. Epub 2010 Apr 18.
2
Positive deamidated gliadin peptide antibodies and negative tissue transglutaminase IgA antibodies in a pediatric population: to biopsy or not to biopsy.儿科人群中抗脱酰胺麦醇溶蛋白肽抗体阳性和抗组织转谷氨酰胺酶IgA抗体阴性:是否进行活检
Clin Vaccine Immunol. 2010 May;17(5):884-6. doi: 10.1128/CVI.00425-09. Epub 2010 Mar 31.
3
Childhood coeliac disease: towards an improved serological mass screening strategy.
儿童乳糜泻:走向更优的血清学大规模筛查策略。
Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2010 Apr;31(7):760-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2009.04226.x. Epub 2009 Dec 25.
4
The changing face of childhood celiac disease in north america: impact of serological testing.北美儿童乳糜泻的变化面貌:血清学检测的影响
Pediatrics. 2009 Dec;124(6):1572-8. doi: 10.1542/peds.2008-2373.
5
Prediction of clinical and mucosal severity of coeliac disease and dermatitis herpetiformis by quantification of IgA/IgG serum antibodies to tissue transglutaminase.通过定量检测血清 IgA/IgG 抗组织转谷氨酰胺酶预测乳糜泻和疱疹样皮炎的临床和黏膜严重程度。
J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2010 Feb;50(2):140-6. doi: 10.1097/MPG.0b013e3181a81384.
6
Performance of serology assays for diagnosing celiac disease in a clinical setting.血清学检测在临床环境中诊断乳糜泻的性能。
Clin Vaccine Immunol. 2009 Nov;16(11):1576-82. doi: 10.1128/CVI.00205-09. Epub 2009 Sep 23.
7
Small-intestinal histopathology and mortality risk in celiac disease.乳糜泻的小肠组织病理学与死亡风险
JAMA. 2009 Sep 16;302(11):1171-8. doi: 10.1001/jama.2009.1320.
8
Meta-analysis: deamidated gliadin peptide antibody and tissue transglutaminase antibody compared as screening tests for coeliac disease.荟萃分析:对比脱酰胺麦胶蛋白肽抗体和组织转谷氨酰胺酶抗体作为乳糜泻的筛查试验。
Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2010 Jan;31(1):73-81. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2009.04110.x.
9
Coeliac disease.乳糜泻
Lancet. 2009 Apr 25;373(9673):1480-93. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60254-3.
10
Is gluten challenge really necessary for the diagnosis of coeliac disease in children younger than age 2 years?对于2岁以下儿童乳糜泻的诊断,麸质激发试验真的有必要吗?
J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2009 May;48(5):566-70. doi: 10.1097/MPG.0b013e31818c526b.