Division of Trauma, Surgical Critical Care, and Burns, Department of Surgery, University of California, San Diego, 200 West Arbor Drive, #8896, San Diego, CA 92103-8896, USA.
World J Surg. 2012 Mar;36(3):497-510. doi: 10.1007/s00268-011-1203-7.
Since the mid-1990s the surgical community has seen a surge in the prevalence of open abdomens (OAs) reported in the surgical literature and in clinical practice. The OA has proven to be effective in decreasing mortality and immediate postoperative complications; however, it may come at the cost of delayed morbidity and the need for further surgical procedures. Indications for leaving the abdomen open have broadened to include damage control surgery, abdominal compartment syndrome, and abdominal sepsis. The surgical options for management of the OA are now more diverse and sophisticated, but there is a lack of prospective randomized controlled trials demonstrating the superiority of any particular method. Additionally, critical care strategies for optimization of the patient with an OA are still being developed. Review of the literature suggests a bimodal distribution of primary closure rates, with early closure dependent on postoperative intensive care management and delayed closure more affected by the choice of the temporary abdominal closure technique. Invariably, a small fraction of patients requiring OA management fail to have primary fascial closure and require some form of biologic fascial bridge with delayed ventral hernia repair in the future.
自 20 世纪 90 年代中期以来,外科文献和临床实践中报告的开放性腹部(OA)的发生率呈上升趋势。OA 已被证明可有效降低死亡率和术后即刻并发症;然而,它可能会导致延迟发病和需要进一步的手术。开放性腹部的适应证已扩大到包括损伤控制手术、腹腔间隔室综合征和腹部脓毒症。OA 的管理的手术选择现在更加多样化和复杂,但缺乏前瞻性随机对照试验证明任何特定方法的优越性。此外,仍在开发用于优化 OA 患者的重症监护策略。文献回顾表明,初次缝合率呈双峰分布,早期闭合取决于术后重症监护管理,而延迟闭合则更多地受到临时腹部闭合技术选择的影响。不可避免的是,一小部分需要 OA 管理的患者无法进行初次筋膜闭合,需要在将来使用某种生物筋膜桥进行延迟的腹疝修复。