Jakob M O, Schwarz C, Haltmeier T, Zindel J, Pinworasarn T, Candinas D, Starlinger P, Beldi G
Department of Visceral Surgery and Medicine, University Hospital, Bern, Switzerland.
Department of Surgery, General Hospital, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Hernia. 2018 Oct;22(5):785-792. doi: 10.1007/s10029-018-1798-9. Epub 2018 Jul 19.
Open abdomen (OA) may be required in patients with abdominal trauma, sepsis or compartment syndrome. Vacuum-assisted wound closure and mesh-mediated fascial traction (VAWCM) is a widely used approach for temporary abdominal closure to close the abdominal wall. However, this method is associated with a high incidence of re-operations in short term and late sequelae such as incisional hernia. The current study aims to compare the results of surgical strategies of OA with versus without permanent mesh augmentation.
Patients with OA treatment undergoing vacuum-assisted wound closure and an intraperitoneal onlay mesh (VAC-IPOM) implantation were compared to VAWCM with direct fascial closure which represents the current standard of care. Outcomes of patients from two tertiary referral centers that performed the different strategies for abdominal closure after OA treatment were compared in univariate and multivariate regression analysis.
A total of 139 patients were included in the study. Of these, 50 (36.0%) patients underwent VAC-IPOM and 89 (64.0%) patients VAWCM. VAC-IPOM was associated with reduced re-operations (adjusted incidence risk ratio 0.48 per 10-person days; CI 95% = 0.39-0.58, p < 0.001), reduced duration of stay on intensive care unit (ICU) [adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) 0.53; CI 95% = 0.36-0.79, p = 0.002] and reduced hospital stay (aHR 0.61; CI 95% = 0.040-0.94; p = 0.024). In-hospital mortality [22.5 vs 18.0%, risk difference - 4.5; confidence interval (CI) 95% = - 18.2 to 9.3; p = 0.665] and the incidence of intestinal fistula (18.0 vs 22.0%, risk difference 4.0; CI 95% = -10.0 to 18.0; p = 0.656) did not differ between the two groups. In Kaplan-Meier analysis, hernia-free survival was significantly increased after VAC-IPOM (p = 0.041).
In patients undergoing OA treatment, intraperitoneal mesh augmentation is associated with a significantly decreased number of re-operations, duration of hospital and ICU stay and incidence of incisional hernias when compared to VAWCM.
腹部创伤、脓毒症或骨筋膜室综合征患者可能需要行开放腹腔(OA)治疗。真空辅助伤口闭合及网片介导的筋膜牵引(VAWCM)是一种广泛应用于临时关闭腹壁的腹部闭合方法。然而,该方法短期再手术发生率高,且存在如切口疝等远期后遗症。本研究旨在比较行与不行永久性网片增强的OA手术策略的结果。
将接受真空辅助伤口闭合及腹腔内补片植入术(VAC-IPOM)的OA治疗患者与代表当前标准治疗的直接筋膜闭合的VAWCM患者进行比较。对两个三级转诊中心在OA治疗后采用不同腹部闭合策略的患者结局进行单因素和多因素回归分析。
本研究共纳入139例患者。其中,50例(36.0%)患者接受了VAC-IPOM治疗,89例(64.0%)患者接受了VAWCM治疗。VAC-IPOM与再手术减少(调整后的发病风险比为每10人日0.48;95%置信区间=0.39-0.58,p<0.001)、重症监护病房(ICU)住院时间缩短[调整后的风险比(aHR)0.53;95%置信区间=0.36-0.79,p=0.002]及住院时间缩短(aHR 0.61;95%置信区间=0.040-0.94;p=0.024)相关。两组的院内死亡率[22.5%对18.0%,风险差异-4.5;95%置信区间=-18.2至9.3;p=0.665]和肠瘘发生率(18.0%对22.0%,风险差异4.0;95%置信区间=-10.0至18.0;p=0.656)无差异。在Kaplan-Meier分析中,VAC-IPOM术后无疝生存率显著提高(p=0.041)。
与VAWCM相比,接受OA治疗的患者采用腹腔内补片增强术可使再手术次数、住院和ICU住院时间及切口疝发生率显著降低。