Skorkovská Karolina, Wilhelm H, Lüdtke H, Wilhelm B
Augenklinik, Universitätsklinikum Tübingen.
Klin Monbl Augenheilkd. 2011 Nov;228(11):979-83. doi: 10.1055/s-0031-1273356. Epub 2011 Aug 16.
The aim of this retrospective study was to estimate the frequency of relative afferent pupillary defect (RAPD) in glaucoma and whether its occurrence relates to the severity of the visual field defect and its side asymmetry as detected by standard automated perimetry.
Among patients with primary open angle glaucoma examined at the glaucoma unit of our university eye hospital patients were identified in whom a swinging-flashlight test as part of their routine examination was carried out. The central 30° visual field was examined by means of static perimetry using the Tübinger Automatic Perimeter or the Octopus Perimeter. The visual field findings and their side difference were compared between patients with and without RAPD by means of the Wilcoxon rank-sum test.
After having taken into consideration the inclusion criteria, 100 glaucoma patients were included in the study, 34 of them had an RAPD (34 %). For the visual field analysis only the data of 85 patients, who received the same perimetric strategy, were used. 25 of them had an RAPD (29 %). The calculated visual field scores in patients with RAPD were significantly higher than those in patients without RAPD (p < 0.01), that means their visual field loss was generally more advanced. Also the side difference in visual field of both eyes was significantly greater in patients with RAPD (p < 0.01). A receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve showed that the side difference in visual field defect is a good predictor for RAPD with an area under curve (AUC) of 0.81.
RAPD can be diagnosed in about one third of patients with primary open angle glaucoma. It can be found especially with more advanced visual field defects and visual field defects with greater side asymmetry. Its absence does not mean that there is no visual field defect at all. We advise to include the swinging-flashlight test in glaucoma diagnostics.
本回顾性研究的目的是评估青光眼患者中相对性传入性瞳孔障碍(RAPD)的发生率,以及其发生是否与标准自动视野计检测出的视野缺损严重程度及其双眼不对称性有关。
在我校眼科医院青光眼科接受检查的原发性开角型青光眼患者中,确定那些进行了作为常规检查一部分的摆动手电筒试验的患者。使用 Tübinger 自动视野计或 Octopus 视野计通过静态视野检查法检查中央 30°视野。采用 Wilcoxon 秩和检验比较有和没有 RAPD 的患者的视野检查结果及其双眼差异。
在考虑纳入标准后,100 例青光眼患者纳入研究,其中 34 例有 RAPD(34%)。视野分析仅使用了 85 例接受相同视野检查策略患者的数据。其中 25 例有 RAPD(29%)。有 RAPD 的患者计算出的视野得分显著高于没有 RAPD 的患者(p < 0.01),这意味着他们的视野缺损通常更严重。有 RAPD 的患者双眼视野的差异也显著更大(p < 0.01)。受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线显示,视野缺损的双眼差异是 RAPD 的良好预测指标,曲线下面积(AUC)为 0.81。
约三分之一的原发性开角型青光眼患者可诊断出 RAPD。尤其在视野缺损更严重以及双眼视野不对称性更大时可发现。没有 RAPD 并不意味着完全没有视野缺损。我们建议在青光眼诊断中纳入摆动手电筒试验。