Department of Medicine, Division of General Medicine, Geriatrics and Palliative Care, Health Sciences Center, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA.
J Altern Complement Med. 2011 Sep;17(9):817-21. doi: 10.1089/acm.2010.0566. Epub 2011 Aug 17.
The objective of this study was to test a model of placebo effects in the context of a general model of health care outcomes.
The design of this study was a multisite, double-blind, placebo-controlled crossover trial.
The study was conducted at The University of Washington Hospital, Seattle, Washington, Cooper Hospital/University Medical Center, Camden, New Jersey, and at the Neurology Center of Fairfax, Fairfax, Virginia.
One hundred and seventeen (117) patients diagnosed with Multiple Sclerosis were enrolled in the study.
Subjects had daily exposure to a pulsing electromagnetic generator.
The outcome measures were the average score of three quality-of-life indices: the Modified Fatigue Impact Scale, the Medical Outcomes Study Pain Effects Scale, and the Spasticity Effects Scale.
Placebo responders scored higher in the personality trait of Absorption compared with nonresponders (p<0.01). Placebo responders were more confident that the sham device was active compared to placebo nonresponders (p<0.009). The two factors of confidence in the treatment and Absorption accurately identified 80% of placebo responders in a discriminant analysis (p<0.0004).
Placebo effects are best understood when integrated in a general model of health care outcomes.
本研究旨在测试一种安慰剂效应模型,该模型基于一般的医疗保健结果模型。
本研究的设计为多站点、双盲、安慰剂对照交叉试验。
本研究在华盛顿大学医院(西雅图,华盛顿州)、库珀医院/大学医学中心(新泽西州卡姆登)和费尔法克斯神经病学中心(弗吉尼亚州费尔法克斯)进行。
117 名被诊断患有多发性硬化症的患者参加了这项研究。
受试者每天接受脉冲电磁场发生器的照射。
结果测量指标为三个生活质量指数的平均得分:改良疲劳影响量表、医疗结局研究疼痛效应量表和痉挛效应量表。
与非应答者相比,安慰剂应答者在吸收人格特质方面的得分更高(p<0.01)。与安慰剂非应答者相比,安慰剂应答者更相信假设备是有效的(p<0.009)。在判别分析中,治疗信心和吸收两个因素准确地识别了 80%的安慰剂应答者(p<0.0004)。
当将安慰剂效应整合到一般的医疗保健结果模型中时,安慰剂效应最容易理解。