Department of Internal Medicine, University Hospital for Internal Medicine V, Hematology and Oncology, Medical University, Innsbruck, Austria.
Eur J Haematol. 2011 Dec;87(6):531-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0609.2011.01692.x. Epub 2011 Sep 19.
Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor-mobilized peripheral blood hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) provides a valuable and increasingly used alternative to bone marrow transplantation (BMT). This retrospective study aimed at determining whether the stem cell source is predictive for outcome, relapse incidence, non-relapse mortality, and severity and incidence of both, acute and chronic graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) in patients undergoing allogeneic HSCT.
Between 1983 and 2007, 329 adult patients (median age 40, range 18-76) received a first allogeneic HSCT from either sibling (n = 203) or volunteer unrelated donors (n = 126) at our institution. The source of stem cells was bone marrow in 177 (54%) and peripheral blood in the remaining 152 (46%) patients.
Overall survival was 37% (31-43%, 95% confidence interval, CI), the relapse incidence was 30% (25-36%, 95% CI), and the non-relapse mortality was 43% (38-49%, 95% CI) for the entire cohort with no significant differences between peripheral blood stem cell or BMT. In patients receiving myeloablative conditioning, peripheral blood stem cell transplantation (PBSCT) was associated with a significantly lower non-relapse mortality (32% vs. 46%, P = 0.05), which, however, was restricted to standard-risk disease (23% vs. 42%, P = 0.02). The overall cumulative incidences of acute GVHD II-IV were 51% and 54% following bone marrow and PBSCT, respectively. Severe acute GVHD III-IV was significantly more frequent after BMT (24% vs. 14%, P = 0.04), whereas chronic GVHD was significantly more frequent following PBSCT (48% vs. 24%, P = 0.0001). By multivariate analysis, PBSCT was only predictive for chronic GVHD (RR 2.29, P = 0.02).
Although we failed to demonstrate any advantage of PBSCT over conventional BMT with regard to overall survival, relapse incidence and non-relapse mortality PBSCT were associated with a significantly higher incidence of chronic graft-versus-host disease. Therefore, and by virtue of observations, that some patient groups might benefit from either stem cell source, there is still need for prospective randomized trials with special emphasize on quality of life in long-term survivors.
粒细胞集落刺激因子动员外周血造血干细胞移植(HSCT)为骨髓移植(BMT)提供了一种有价值且越来越多的替代方法。本回顾性研究旨在确定干细胞来源是否对异体 HSCT 患者的结局、复发率、非复发死亡率以及急性和慢性移植物抗宿主病(GVHD)的严重程度和发生率有预测作用。
1983 年至 2007 年间,我们机构的 329 名成年患者(中位年龄 40 岁,范围 18-76 岁)接受了来自同胞(n=203)或志愿无关供者(n=126)的首次同种异体 HSCT。干细胞来源为骨髓 177 例(54%),外周血 152 例(46%)。
整个队列的总生存率为 37%(31-43%,95%置信区间,CI),复发率为 30%(25-36%,95%CI),非复发死亡率为 43%(38-49%,95%CI),外周血干细胞或 BMT 之间无显著差异。在接受清髓性预处理的患者中,外周血干细胞移植(PBSCT)与非复发死亡率显著降低相关(32% vs. 46%,P=0.05),但仅限于标准风险疾病(23% vs. 42%,P=0.02)。骨髓和 PBSCT 后急性 GVHD II-IV 的总累积发生率分别为 51%和 54%。BMT 后严重急性 GVHD III-IV 明显更常见(24% vs. 14%,P=0.04),而 PBSCT 后慢性 GVHD 明显更常见(48% vs. 24%,P=0.0001)。多变量分析显示,PBSCT 仅与慢性 GVHD 相关(RR 2.29,P=0.02)。
尽管我们未能证明 PBSCT 在总体生存、复发率和非复发死亡率方面优于传统的 BMT,但 PBSCT 与慢性移植物抗宿主病的发生率显著增加相关。因此,根据观察结果,一些患者群体可能受益于任何一种干细胞来源,仍需要前瞻性随机试验,特别强调长期生存者的生活质量。