Nephrology Dialysis and Renal Transplantation Unit, S.Orsola University Hospital, Bologna, Italy.
Artif Organs. 2012 Jan;36(1):21-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1594.2011.01290.x. Epub 2011 Aug 16.
Thrombosis-related malfunction of tunneled-cuffed central venous catheters (TCC) for hemodialysis (HD) currently leads to a high rate of untimely catheter removal. Urokinase (UK) therapy is used for TCC thrombosis/malfunction, but no consensus exists on the adequate dose to obtain thrombolysis. We selected 72 HD patients with TCC and a mean age and HD vintage of 74 years (range 65-87) and 36 months (range 12-61), respectively. All patients received warfarin therapy with a target international normalized ratio (INR) of 1.8-2.5. Coagulative assessment of the patients was obtained by checking the INR, activated partial thromboplastin time, fibrinogen, hemoglobin, and platelets. Sixty-five thrombotic events were recorded during a 3-year follow-up (median 0.3 events/patient/year). The patients selected were randomized into two groups according to a different thrombolytic therapy. Group A comprised 29 thrombotic events in 32 patients who received UK 25,000 IU in both arterial and venous lines of the TCC for each event. UK restored an adequate blood flow rate (BFR) for HD (≥ 250 mL/min) in 4/29 events (13.7%), whereas addition of 50,000 IU to both arterial and venous lines was required in 25/29 events (86.3%). For the same 25 events in the second HD session, a further 75,000 IU of UK was needed for each TCC lumen. Group B comprised 36 thrombotic events in 40 patients who received 100 000 IU of UK in the arterial and venous lumen of the TCC for each event. An adequate BFR was recovered in all events. In 12/36 events (33.3%), 100,000 IU UK for both lumens were needed in the second HD. In conclusion, group B patients obtained (i) a significantly better TCC patency than group A patients; (ii) a low UK administration in the following HD sessions; and (iii) no bleeding complications.
经皮隧道带涤纶套中心静脉导管(TCC)在血液透析(HD)中因血栓相关故障而导致导管提前移除的发生率较高。尿激酶(UK)疗法用于 TCC 血栓/故障,但对于获得溶栓所需的适当剂量尚无共识。我们选择了 72 名 TCC 的 HD 患者,平均年龄和 HD 年限分别为 74 岁(范围 65-87 岁)和 36 个月(范围 12-61 个月)。所有患者均接受华法林治疗,目标国际标准化比值(INR)为 1.8-2.5。通过检查 INR、活化部分凝血活酶时间、纤维蛋白原、血红蛋白和血小板来评估患者的凝血状态。在 3 年的随访期间记录了 65 例血栓形成事件(中位数为 0.3 例/患者/年)。根据不同的溶栓治疗方案,将患者随机分为两组。A 组包括 29 例血栓形成事件,32 例患者在 TCC 的动静脉线中各接受 UK25,000IU。UK 恢复了足够的血液透析(HD)血流率(BFR)(≥250ml/min)在 4/29 例(13.7%),而在 25/29 例中需要增加动静脉线各 50,000IU(86.3%)。对于第二次 HD 治疗中的同一 25 例事件,每个 TCC 管腔还需要额外的 75,000IU UK。B 组包括 36 例血栓形成事件,40 例患者在 TCC 的动静脉管腔中各接受 UK100,000IU。所有事件均恢复了足够的 BFR。在 12/36 例(33.3%)事件中,第二次 HD 需要在两个管腔中各给予 UK100,000IU。总之,B 组患者(i)TCC 通畅性明显优于 A 组患者;(ii)在后续 HD 治疗中 UK 给药量较低;(iii)无出血并发症。