Unsworth Nash, Redick Thomas S, Spillers Gregory J, Brewer Gene A
Department of Psychology, University of Oregon, Eugene, OR 97403, USA.
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2012;65(2):326-55. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2011.597865. Epub 2011 Aug 18.
Variation in working memory capacity (WMC) and cognitive control was examined in four experiments. In the experiments high- and low-WMC individuals performed a choice reaction time task (Experiment 1), a version of the antisaccade task (Experiment 2), a version of the Stroop task (Experiment 3), and an arrow version of the flanker task (Experiment 4). An examination of response time distributions suggested that high- and low-WMC individuals primarily differed in the slowest responses in each experiment, consistent with the notion that WMC is related to active maintenance abilities. Examination of two indicators of microadjustments of control (posterror slowing and conflict adaptation effects) suggested no differences between high- and low-WMC individuals. Collectively these results suggest that variation in WMC is related to some, but not all, cognitive control operations. The results are interpreted within the executive attention theory of WMC.
在四项实验中,对工作记忆容量(WMC)和认知控制的差异进行了研究。在实验中,高WMC个体和低WMC个体执行了选择反应时任务(实验1)、一种反眼跳任务版本(实验2)、一种斯特鲁普任务版本(实验3)以及一种箭头版本的侧翼任务(实验4)。对反应时间分布的检查表明,高WMC个体和低WMC个体在每个实验中最慢的反应上存在主要差异,这与WMC与主动维持能力相关的观点一致。对控制微调整的两个指标(错误后反应减慢和冲突适应效应)的检查表明,高WMC个体和低WMC个体之间没有差异。总体而言,这些结果表明WMC的差异与部分而非全部认知控制操作有关。这些结果在WMC的执行性注意理论框架内进行了解释。