• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

满意度和生活质量:基于调查的完全植入式静脉港系统患者评估。

Satisfaction and quality of life: a survey-based assessment in patients with a totally implantable venous port system.

机构信息

Department of Radiology, Charité University Medicine, Berlin Department of Psychiatry, Charité University Medicine, Charitéplatz 1, Berlin, Germany.

出版信息

Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2012 Mar;21(2):197-204. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2354.2011.01275.x. Epub 2011 Aug 18.

DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2354.2011.01275.x
PMID:21851433
Abstract

The purpose was to assess the satisfaction and quality of life in patients with a totally implantable central venous port system using a questionnaire-based survey. A self-designed questionnaire to assess patient satisfaction and the impact of the port on daily life was dispatched 180 days after implantation. The questionnaire was combined with the commonly used short form (SF)-12 Health Survey quality of life questionnaire. Of the 98 patients who received a port system, 75 were contacted, and 42 (56%) returned the questionnaire. Most of the responding patients reported high overall satisfaction. The impact of the system on daily life was widely perceived not to be negative. The physical component summary (PCS) and the mental component summary (MCS) scores from the SF-12 were 35.5 and 45.23 respectively (general German population: PCS = 49.6, MCS = 52.3). The multiple stepwise regression showed that the cosmetic result was a predictor of overall satisfaction; the cosmetic result and a painful port together were predictors of the MCS. Overall, it was found that the cosmetic result of the implantation procedure was a predictor of satisfaction and quality of life and should thus not be underestimated.

摘要

目的是通过问卷调查评估完全植入式中心静脉港系统患者的满意度和生活质量。在植入后 180 天,我们发送了一份自行设计的问卷,以评估患者对植入港的满意度和对日常生活的影响。该问卷结合了常用的简明健康调查问卷(SF-12)。在接受港系统的 98 名患者中,我们联系了 75 名患者,其中 42 名(56%)返回了问卷。大多数接受调查的患者报告总体满意度较高。该系统对日常生活的影响被广泛认为是没有负面影响的。SF-12 的生理成分综合评分(PCS)和心理成分综合评分(MCS)分别为 35.5 和 45.23(一般德国人群:PCS=49.6,MCS=52.3)。多元逐步回归显示,美容效果是总体满意度的预测因素;美容效果和疼痛的港一起是 MCS 的预测因素。总的来说,我们发现植入过程的美容效果是满意度和生活质量的预测因素,因此不应被低估。

相似文献

1
Satisfaction and quality of life: a survey-based assessment in patients with a totally implantable venous port system.满意度和生活质量:基于调查的完全植入式静脉港系统患者评估。
Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2012 Mar;21(2):197-204. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2354.2011.01275.x. Epub 2011 Aug 18.
2
Patients' attitudes to totally implantable venous access port systems for gynecological or breast malignancies.患者对用于妇科或乳腺恶性肿瘤的完全植入式静脉通路端口系统的态度。
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2007 Feb;33(1):39-43. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2006.08.003. Epub 2006 Oct 9.
3
Effect on clinical outcomes of patient pain expectancies and preoperative Mental Component Summary scores from the 36-Item Short Form Health Survey following anterior cervical discectomy and fusion.颈椎前路椎间盘切除融合术后患者疼痛预期和 36 项简明健康调查心理成分综合评分对临床结局的影响。
J Neurosurg Spine. 2011 Nov;15(5):486-90. doi: 10.3171/2011.6.SPINE11114. Epub 2011 Aug 5.
4
Assessment of health-related quality of life after surgical treatment of focal symptomatic spinal stenosis compared with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee.与髋或膝关节骨关节炎相比,局灶性症状性脊柱狭窄手术治疗后健康相关生活质量的评估。
Spine J. 2008 Mar-Apr;8(2):296-304. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2007.05.003. Epub 2007 Jun 18.
5
Patient-reported outcomes in patients with endocrine tumors of the ileum.回肠内分泌肿瘤患者的患者报告结局。
Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2010 Jun;22(6):689-94. doi: 10.1097/MEG.0b013e32832d2364.
6
Determination of minimum clinically important difference in pain, disability, and quality of life after extension of fusion for adjacent-segment disease.测定融合延伸治疗相邻节段病变后疼痛、残疾和生活质量的最小临床重要差异。
J Neurosurg Spine. 2012 Jan;16(1):61-7. doi: 10.3171/2011.8.SPINE1194. Epub 2011 Sep 30.
7
Totally implantable venous access ports--the patients' point of view. A quality control study.完全植入式静脉通路端口——患者视角。一项质量控制研究。
Cancer Nurs. 1992 Oct;15(5):378-81.
8
Prospective analysis of clinical evaluation and self-assessment by patients after decompression surgery for degenerative lumbar canal stenosis.退行性腰椎管狭窄减压手术后患者临床评估与自我评估的前瞻性分析
Spine J. 2008 Mar-Apr;8(2):380-4. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2007.01.010. Epub 2007 Mar 13.
9
Quality of life assessment using the Short Form-12 (SF-12) questionnaire in patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy: comparison with SF-36.使用简短健康调查问卷12项版(SF - 12)对脊髓型颈椎病患者进行生活质量评估:与健康调查问卷36项版(SF - 36)的比较
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2006 Mar 15;31(6):639-43. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000202744.48633.44.
10
Quality of life assessment after percutaneous aortic valve implantation.经皮主动脉瓣植入术后的生活质量评估。
Eur Heart J. 2009 Jul;30(14):1790-6. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehp171. Epub 2009 May 13.

引用本文的文献

1
Analysis of the reasons for removal of vascular ports in patients treated in chemotherapy and gynecological oncology departments - preliminary investigations.化疗及妇科肿瘤科室患者血管通路拔除原因分析——初步调查
Prz Menopauzalny. 2025 Jun;24(2):102-112. doi: 10.5114/pm.2025.152126. Epub 2025 Jun 16.
2
Prospective, monocentric observational study on the clinical use and patient satisfaction of an implantable venous access Port.关于植入式静脉通路端口临床应用及患者满意度的前瞻性单中心观察性研究。
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2025 Feb 26;410(1):84. doi: 10.1007/s00423-025-03654-3.
3
Wound Closure After Port Implantation-A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Tissue Adhesive and Intracutaneous Suturing.
经皮穿刺端口植入术后的伤口闭合:组织粘合剂与皮内缝合的随机对照试验。
Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2021 Nov 5;118(44):749-755. doi: 10.3238/arztebl.m2021.0324.
4
Patient acceptability of three different central venous access devices for the delivery of systemic anticancer therapy: a qualitative study.三种不同中心静脉置管设备用于全身抗癌治疗的患者接受度:一项定性研究。
BMJ Open. 2019 Jul 9;9(7):e026077. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-026077.
5
Retrospective outcome analysis of rates and types of complications after 8654 minimally invasive radiological port implantations via the subclavian vein without ultrasound guidance.回顾性分析 8654 例超声引导下锁骨下静脉微创放射科端口植入术后的并发症发生率和类型。
Radiol Med. 2019 Sep;124(9):926-933. doi: 10.1007/s11547-019-01048-2. Epub 2019 Jun 7.
6
Improving cancer patients' knowledge about totally implantable access port: a randomized controlled trial.提高癌症患者对全植入式输液港的认识:一项随机对照试验。
Support Care Cancer. 2016 Feb;24(2):833-841. doi: 10.1007/s00520-015-2851-1. Epub 2015 Jul 24.
7
Risk factors for venous port migration in a single institute in Taiwan.台湾某单一机构中静脉留置针移位的危险因素。
World J Surg Oncol. 2014 Jan 14;12:15. doi: 10.1186/1477-7819-12-15.
8
Percutaneous image-guided implantation of totally implantable venous access ports in the forearm or the chest? A patients' point of view.经皮影像引导在前臂或胸部植入完全植入式静脉输液港?患者观点。
Support Care Cancer. 2013 Feb;21(2):505-10. doi: 10.1007/s00520-012-1544-2. Epub 2012 Jul 25.
9
Palliative treatment of colorectal cancer in Germany: cost of care and quality of life.德国结直肠癌姑息治疗:医疗成本和生活质量。
Eur J Health Econ. 2013 Aug;14(4):629-38. doi: 10.1007/s10198-012-0408-5. Epub 2012 Jun 12.