Department of Kinesiology, Neag School of Education, University of Connecticut, 358 Mansfield Road, Storrs, CT 06269-2101, USA.
Percept Mot Skills. 2011 Jun;112(3):803-6. doi: 10.2466/15.26.PMS.112.3.803-806.
The usefulness of the five-repetition sit-to-stand (FRSTS) test was assessed with older patients in a home-care setting. Records of 45 patients (> or = 65 years old) were examined for information on FRSTS test performance. 5 patients were excluded. 23 patients were unable to complete the test. For the 17 able to complete the FRSTS test, the time required was statistically significantly greater than age-stratified norms. For patients treated in a home-care setting, inability to complete the FRSTS test clearly underscores the test's limitations and the need for alternatives.
在居家护理环境中,我们评估了 5 次重复坐站(FRSTS)测试对老年患者的有用性。我们检查了 45 名(>=65 岁)患者的记录,以获取 FRSTS 测试表现的信息。排除了 5 名患者。有 23 名患者无法完成测试。对于能够完成 FRSTS 测试的 17 名患者,所需时间明显大于按年龄分层的标准。对于在居家护理环境中接受治疗的患者,无法完成 FRSTS 测试清楚地表明了该测试的局限性以及需要替代方案。