Harefield Pulmonary Rehabilitation Unit, Harefield Hospital, and.
Harefield Respiratory Research Group, Heart, Lung, and Critical Care Clinical Group, Guy's and St. Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.
Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2024 Apr;21(4):577-584. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.202306-561OC.
Standing from a sitting position is an important activity of daily living. The five-repetition sit-to-stand test (5STS) is a simple physical performance test that measures the fastest time taken to stand five times from a chair with arms folded. It can be measured in most healthcare settings and at home, where traditional field walking tests may not be possible. The 5STS has been validated in community-dwelling older adults and people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, but data in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) are limited. The aims of this cohort study were to establish the construct validity, responsiveness to pulmonary rehabilitation (PR), and minimal important difference (MID) of the 5STS in IPF. In 149 people with IPF, we compared the 5STS with measures of lung function, exercise capacity, quadriceps strength, breathlessness, and health-related quality of life. Responsiveness and effect sizes were determined by measuring the 5STS before and after PR. The MID was estimated using anchor- and distribution-based methods. The 5STS correlated significantly with incremental shuttle walk test (ISW) ( = -0.55), isometric quadriceps maximum voluntary contraction (QMVC) ( = -0.45), Medical Research Council dyspnea scale score ( = 0.40), Chronic Respiratory Questionnaire-Total ( = -0.21), and King's Brief Interstitial Lung Disease Questionnaire-Total ( = -0.21) but not forced vital capacity percentage predicted or quadriceps one-repetition maximum (1RM). There was a significant but very weak correlation between change in 5STS and changes in Medical Research Council ( = 0.18), ISW ( = -0.21), and Chronic Respiratory Questionnaire-Total ( = -0.26) but no significant correlation with change in 1RM ( = -0.12) or QMVC ( = -0.18). 5STS time improved with PR (median [25th percentile, 75th percentile] change, -1.97 [-3.47, -0.62] s; < 0.001). The effect size for the 5STS was 0.66 and higher than quadriceps 1RM, QMVC, and ISW. The mean (range) MID estimate was -1.93 (-1.85 to -2.10) seconds. In people with IPF, the 5STS is a valid physical performance measure that is responsive to exercise-based interventions and suitable for use in most healthcare settings.
从坐姿站立是日常生活中的一项重要活动。五次重复坐站测试(5STS)是一种简单的体能测试,用于测量从带扶手的椅子上最快站起五次所需的时间。它可以在大多数医疗保健环境和家庭中进行测量,而传统的现场步行测试可能无法进行。5STS 已在社区居住的老年人和慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者中得到验证,但特发性肺纤维化(IPF)的数据有限。本队列研究的目的是确定 5STS 在 IPF 中的结构有效性、对肺康复(PR)的反应性和最小有意义差异(MID)。在 149 名 IPF 患者中,我们将 5STS 与肺功能、运动能力、股四头肌力量、呼吸困难和健康相关生活质量的测量值进行了比较。通过 PR 前后测量 5STS 来确定反应性和效应大小。MID 是使用基于锚定和分布的方法估计的。5STS 与递增穿梭步行试验(ISW)显著相关( = -0.55),与等长股四头肌最大自愿收缩(QMVC)( = -0.45)、医学研究委员会呼吸困难量表评分( = 0.40)、慢性呼吸系统问卷总分( = -0.21)和 King's 简短间质性肺疾病问卷总分( = -0.21)显著相关,但与用力肺活量百分比预测值或股四头肌 1 次重复最大(1RM)无关。5STS 的变化与医学研究委员会( = 0.18)、ISW( = -0.21)和慢性呼吸系统问卷总分( = -0.26)的变化呈显著但非常弱的相关性,但与 1RM( = -0.12)或 QMVC( = -0.18)的变化无显著相关性。5STS 时间随 PR 而改善(中位数[25%分位数,75%分位数]变化,-1.97[-3.47,-0.62]s; < 0.001)。5STS 的效应大小为 0.66,高于股四头肌 1RM、QMVC 和 ISW。平均(范围)MID 估计值为-1.93(-1.85 至-2.10)秒。在 IPF 患者中,5STS 是一种有效的体能测量指标,对基于运动的干预措施有反应,适用于大多数医疗保健环境。