Suppr超能文献

在安静环境下,入耳式和自由场麦克风在声音类别上的可懂度差异。

Speech intelligibility differences across sound classes with in-the-ear and free-field microphones in quiet.

机构信息

Department of Speech Pathology and Audiology, College of Allied Health Professions, University of South Alabama, HAHN 1119, Mobile, AL 36688-0002, USA.

出版信息

Percept Mot Skills. 2011 Jun;112(3):845-59. doi: 10.2466/24.28.PMS.112.3.845-859.

Abstract

Speech intelligibility performance with an in-the-ear microphone embedded in a custom-molded deep-insertion earplug was compared with results obtained using a free-field microphone. Intelligibility differences between microphones were further analyzed to assess whether reduced intelligibility was specific to certain sound classes. 36 participants completed the Modified Rhyme Test using recordings made with each microphone. While speech intelligibility for both microphones was highly accurate, intelligibility with the free-field microphone was significantly better than with the in-the-ear microphone. There were significant effects of place and manner of sound production. Significant differences in recognition among specific phonemes were also revealed. Implications included modifying the in-the-ear microphone to transmit more high frequency energy. Use of the in-the-ear microphone was limited by significant loss of high-frequency energy of the speech signal which resulted in reduced intelligibility for some sounds; however, the in-the-ear microphone is a promising technology for effective communication in military environments.

摘要

将嵌入式耳内麦克风的定制深插入耳塞的语音清晰度性能与使用自由场麦克风获得的结果进行了比较。进一步分析了麦克风之间的可懂度差异,以评估可懂度降低是否特定于某些声音类别。36 名参与者使用每个麦克风录制的录音完成了修改后的押韵测试。虽然两种麦克风的语音清晰度都非常准确,但自由场麦克风的清晰度明显优于耳内麦克风。声音产生的位置和方式有显著影响。还揭示了特定音素之间识别的显著差异。这包括修改耳内麦克风以传输更多高频能量。由于言语信号的高频能量显著损失,耳内麦克风的使用受到限制,导致某些声音的可懂度降低;然而,耳内麦克风是在军事环境中进行有效沟通的有前途的技术。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验