• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

提供反馈:探索一种促进多源反馈的模型(情感、内容、结果)。

Providing feedback: exploring a model (emotion, content, outcomes) for facilitating multisource feedback.

机构信息

University of Dundee, UK.

出版信息

Med Teach. 2011;33(9):744-9. doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2011.577287.

DOI:10.3109/0142159X.2011.577287
PMID:21854151
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Multi-source feedback (MSF) aims to raise self-awareness of performance and encourage improvement. The ECO model (emotions, content, outcome) is a three-step process developed from the counselling literature to facilitate feedback acceptance and use in MSF.

AIMS

The purpose of this study was to explore the acceptability, usefulness and educational impact of the model.

METHODS

This was a qualitative study using interviews to explore general practice (GP) trainer and trainee experiences and perceptions of the ECO facilitation model. Interviews were conducted by telephone, recorded, transcribed and analysed using a thematic framework.

RESULTS

About 13 GP trainers and trainees participated in the interviews following their MSF discussions using the ECO model. They agreed that the model was useful, simple to use and engaged trainees in reflection upon their feedback and performance. Exploring emotions and clarifying content appeared integral to accepting and using the feedback. Positive feedback was often surprising. Most trainees reported performance improvements following their MSF-ECO session.

CONCLUSIONS

The model appeared acceptable and simple to use. Engaging the learner as a partner in the feedback discussion appeared effective. Further research is needed to fully understand the influence of each step in facilitating MSF acceptance and use, and to determine the impact of the ECO model alone upon performance outcomes compared to more traditional provision of MSF feedback.

摘要

背景

多源反馈(MSF)旨在提高对绩效的自我意识并鼓励改进。ECO 模型(情感、内容、结果)是从咨询文献中开发的一个三步过程,旨在促进反馈的接受和在 MSF 中的使用。

目的

本研究的目的是探讨该模型的可接受性、有用性和教育影响。

方法

这是一项定性研究,使用访谈来探索全科医生培训师和学员对 ECO 促进模型的经验和看法。访谈通过电话进行,记录、转录并使用主题框架进行分析。

结果

在使用 ECO 模型进行 MSF 讨论后,约有 13 名全科医生培训师和学员参加了访谈。他们一致认为该模型很有用,使用简单,并促使学员对反馈和表现进行反思。探索情感和澄清内容似乎是接受和使用反馈的关键。积极的反馈往往令人惊讶。大多数学员报告说在他们的 MSF-ECO 会议后,他们的表现有所提高。

结论

该模型似乎是可以接受的,并且使用简单。让学习者作为反馈讨论的伙伴参与进来似乎是有效的。需要进一步研究,以充分了解促进 MSF 接受和使用的每个步骤的影响,并确定 ECO 模型对绩效结果的影响,与更传统的 MSF 反馈提供相比。

相似文献

1
Providing feedback: exploring a model (emotion, content, outcomes) for facilitating multisource feedback.提供反馈:探索一种促进多源反馈的模型(情感、内容、结果)。
Med Teach. 2011;33(9):744-9. doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2011.577287.
2
A qualitative exploration: questioning multisource feedback in residency education.一项定性探索:质疑住院医师教育中的多源反馈。
BMC Med Educ. 2018 Jul 24;18(1):170. doi: 10.1186/s12909-018-1270-7.
3
Clinical education: nursing students' experiences with multisource feedback using a digital assessment instrument in the emergency medical Service - a qualitative study.临床教育:护理专业学生在紧急医疗服务中使用数字评估工具进行多源反馈的体验——一项定性研究
BMC Med Educ. 2025 Mar 18;25(1):391. doi: 10.1186/s12909-025-06950-0.
4
Multisource feedback in medical students' workplace learning in primary health care.多源反馈在医学生基层医疗卫生机构实习中的应用
BMC Med Educ. 2022 May 25;22(1):401. doi: 10.1186/s12909-022-03468-7.
5
Understanding the influence of emotions and reflection upon multi-source feedback acceptance and use.理解情绪和反思对多源反馈接受与使用的影响。
Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2008 Aug;13(3):275-88. doi: 10.1007/s10459-006-9039-x. Epub 2006 Nov 8.
6
Ratings of performance in multisource feedback: comparing performance theories of residents and nurses.多源反馈中的绩效评估:比较住院医师和护士的绩效理论。
BMC Med Educ. 2020 Oct 12;20(1):355. doi: 10.1186/s12909-020-02276-1.
7
The impact of UTeach observation protocol-based multiple-source feedback on improving the quality of online teaching in medical education.基于 UTeach 观察协议的多源反馈对提高医学教育中在线教学质量的影响。
BMC Med Educ. 2024 Nov 13;24(1):1296. doi: 10.1186/s12909-024-06317-x.
8
Exploring trainer and trainee emotional talk in narratives about workplace-based feedback processes.探讨关于基于工作场所的反馈过程的叙述中培训师和受训者的情感交流。
Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2018 Mar;23(1):75-93. doi: 10.1007/s10459-017-9775-0. Epub 2017 Apr 29.
9
Feasibility, quality and validity of narrative multisource feedback in postgraduate training: a mixed-method study.叙事多源反馈在研究生培训中的可行性、质量和有效性:一项混合方法研究。
BMJ Open. 2021 Jul 28;11(7):e047019. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-047019.
10
Difficulty giving feedback on underperformance undermines the educational value of multi-source feedback.难以对表现不佳提供反馈,会削弱多源反馈的教育价值。
Med Teach. 2013 Oct;35(10):838-46. doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2013.804910. Epub 2013 Jun 28.

引用本文的文献

1
Time to Make Sense: Doctors' and Students' Experiences of Difficult Feedback.是时候弄明白了:医生和学生面对困难反馈的经历。
Perspect Med Educ. 2025 Sep 1;14(1):519-530. doi: 10.5334/pme.1689. eCollection 2025.
2
Optimizing feedback reception: a scoping review of skills and strategies for medical learners.优化反馈接收:医学学习者技能与策略的范围综述
Can Med Educ J. 2025 May 1;16(2):48-62. doi: 10.36834/cmej.79722. eCollection 2025 May.
3
Student Perceptions of Assessment for Workplace Learning and Summative Decisions Using Frequent Mini-CEXs.
学生对使用频繁微型临床评估练习进行职场学习评估和总结性决策的看法。
MedEdPublish (2016). 2017 Jun 22;6:113. doi: 10.15694/mep.2017.000113. eCollection 2017.
4
[Empowering yourself to better participate in feedback: a new cognitive-behavioural model for medical learners].增强自身能力以更好地参与反馈:一种针对医学学习者的新认知行为模型
Can Med Educ J. 2023 Jun 27;14(3):6-13. doi: 10.36834/cmej.74419. eCollection 2023 Jun.
5
Sharing perspectives on feedback: a combined resident-faculty workshop.分享反馈视角:联合住院医师-教员研讨会。
BMC Med Educ. 2022 Mar 22;22(1):197. doi: 10.1186/s12909-022-03253-6.
6
How does multisource feedback influence residency training? A qualitative case study.多源反馈如何影响住院医师培训?一项定性案例研究。
Med Educ. 2022 Jun;56(6):660-669. doi: 10.1111/medu.14798. Epub 2022 Mar 16.
7
Interprofessional perceptions of emotional, social, and ethical effects of multidrug-resistant organisms: A qualitative study.跨专业视角下对多重耐药菌的情绪、社会和伦理影响的认知:一项定性研究。
PLoS One. 2021 Feb 22;16(2):e0246820. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0246820. eCollection 2021.
8
A german-language competency-based multisource feedback instrument for residents: development and validity evidence.一种用于住院医师的基于德语能力的多源反馈工具:开发与效度证据
BMC Med Educ. 2020 Oct 12;20(1):357. doi: 10.1186/s12909-020-02259-2.
9
Feedback Redefined: Principles and Practice.反馈的再定义:原则与实践。
J Gen Intern Med. 2019 May;34(5):744-749. doi: 10.1007/s11606-019-04874-2.
10
Behind the Curtain: The Nurse's Voice in Assessment of Residents in the Emergency Department.幕后:急诊部评估住院医生时护士的声音。
West J Emerg Med. 2019 Jan;20(1):23-28. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2018.10.39821. Epub 2018 Nov 19.