Hamilton W D, Axelrod R, Tanese R
Department of Zoology, Oxford University, United Kingdom.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1990 May;87(9):3566-73. doi: 10.1073/pnas.87.9.3566.
Darwinian theory has yet to explain adequately the fact of sex. If males provide little or no aid to offspring, a high (up to 2-fold) extra average fitness has to emerge as a property of a sexual parentage if sex is to be stable. The advantage must presumably come from recombination but has been hard to identify. It may well lie in the necessity to recombine defenses to defeat numerous parasites. A model demonstrating this works best for contesting hosts whose defense polymorphisms are constrained to low mutation rates. A review of the literature shows that the predictions of parasite coevolution fit well with the known ecology of sex. Moreover, parasite coevolution is superior to previous models of the evolution of sex by supporting the stability of sex under the following challenging conditions: very low fecundity, realistic patterns of genotype fitness and changing environment, and frequent mutation to parthenogenesis, even while sex pays the full 2-fold cost.
达尔文理论尚未充分解释有性生殖这一事实。如果雄性对后代几乎没有或根本没有帮助,那么如果有性生殖要保持稳定,作为有性生殖亲本的一种特性,就必须出现较高(高达两倍)的额外平均适应性。这种优势大概一定来自重组,但一直难以确定。它很可能在于重组防御以战胜众多寄生虫的必要性。一个证明这一点的模型最适用于那些防御多态性被限制在低突变率的竞争宿主。对文献的综述表明,寄生虫共同进化的预测与已知的有性生殖生态学非常吻合。此外,寄生虫共同进化在以下具有挑战性的条件下支持有性生殖的稳定性,优于先前的有性生殖进化模型:极低的繁殖力、现实的基因型适应性模式和不断变化的环境,以及频繁发生孤雌生殖突变,即使有性生殖要付出完整的两倍代价。