Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Dairy and Swine Research and Development Centre, Sherbrooke, Quebec, Canada.
J Dairy Sci. 2011 Sep;94(9):4734-43. doi: 10.3168/jds.2010-3596.
The Canadian dairy industry operates under a supply management system with production quotas (expressed in kilograms of butterfat per day) owned by dairy producers. Any management strategy influencing production responses must, therefore, be evaluated to estimate its effects on quota needed to sell the milk produced. In the present study, half of the cows from 13 commercial herds (850 cows, average of 70 cows per herd) were assigned to be managed for a short dry period (SDP; 35 d dry) and the other half was managed for a conventional dry period (CDP; 60 d dry) to evaluate the economic impact of a steady state involving either CDP or SDP. Economic variables included in the partial budget were: variations in revenues from milk and components as well as animals sold; costs related to feeding, reproduction, replacement, housing, and treatments. All variables were first estimated on a cow basis for each herd individually, and average results were used to calculate the partial budget for an average herd. Yearly milk and component yields per cow increased, which implies that fewer cows are required to produce the same amount of quota. Accordingly, 2 scenarios were investigated: in the first one, available quota was kept constant, and herd size was adjusted to avoid over-quota production. Consequently, the partial budget was calculated considering that 5 fewer cows were present in the herd. In this situation, switching to an SDP management increased net annual income for the farm by $2,677 (Can$), which represents $41.38 per cow. In the second scenario, the number of cows was kept constant, but additional quota (5.5 kg/d, $25,000/kg) was bought to allow selling all of the milk produced. In this case, net farm income was increased by $17,132 annually with SDP, which represents $245.18 per cow. This budget includes interest on the purchase of quota. A comparison of partial budgets for individual herds involved in the study revealed considerable variation among herds. Switching from a CDP to a SDP management would be beneficial for average dairy herds in eastern Canada.
加拿大的乳制品行业采用供应管理系统,生产配额(以每天的乳脂千克数表示)归乳制品生产商所有。因此,任何影响生产反应的管理策略都必须进行评估,以估计其对销售所产牛奶所需配额的影响。在本研究中,将 13 个商业牛群中的一半奶牛(850 头,平均每个牛群 70 头)分配进行短期干奶期管理(SDP;35 天干奶期),另一半奶牛进行传统干奶期管理(CDP;60 天干奶期),以评估涉及 CDP 或 SDP 的稳定状态的经济影响。部分预算中包含的经济变量包括:牛奶和成分以及出售动物的收入变化;与饲养、繁殖、更替、住房和治疗相关的成本。所有变量首先按每个牛群个体进行估计,然后使用平均结果计算平均牛群的部分预算。每头奶牛的年产奶量和成分产量增加,这意味着生产相同数量配额所需的奶牛数量减少。因此,研究了 2 种情况:在第一种情况下,保持可用配额不变,并调整牛群规模以避免超额生产。因此,在计算部分预算时,假设牛群中减少了 5 头奶牛。在这种情况下,切换到 SDP 管理可使农场的净年收入增加 2677 加元(Can$),即每头牛增加 41.38 加元。在第二种情况下,保持奶牛数量不变,但购买额外的配额(5.5 千克/天,25000 加元/千克)以允许销售所产的全部牛奶。在这种情况下,采用 SDP 可使农场的净收入每年增加 17132 加元,即每头牛增加 245.18 加元。本预算包括购买配额的利息。对参与研究的各个牛群的部分预算进行比较发现,牛群之间存在很大差异。将 CDP 管理切换到 SDP 管理对加拿大东部的普通奶牛场将是有益的。