School of Environment, Griffith University, Gold Coast, Queensland 4222, Australia.
J Environ Manage. 2011 Dec;92(12):3049-57. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2011.07.016.
Mountain biking is an increasingly popular, but sometimes controversial, activity in protected areas. Limited research on its impacts, including studies comparing biking with hiking, contributes to the challenges for mangers in assessing its appropriateness. The impacts of mountain bike riding off trail were compared to those of hiking on subalpine grassland in Australia using a modification of a common trampling experimental methodology. Vegetation and soil parameters were measured immediately and two weeks after different intensities of mountain biking (none, 25, 75, 200 and 500 passes across slope, 200 pass up and down slope) and hiking (200 and 500 passes across slope). There were reductions in vegetation height, cover and species richness, as well as changes in species composition and increases in litter and soil compaction with riding. Riding up and down a moderate slope had a greater impact than riding across the slope. Hiking also affected vegetation height, cover and composition. Mountain biking caused more damage than hiking but only at high use (500 passes). Further research including other ecosystems, topography, styles of riding, and weather conditions are required, but under the conditions tested here, hiking and mountain biking appear to be similar in their environmental impacts.
山地自行车运动在保护区中越来越受欢迎,但有时也存在争议。对其影响的研究有限,包括将骑车与徒步进行比较的研究,这给管理者评估其适宜性带来了挑战。本研究使用一种常见踩踏实验方法的改进版,比较了澳大利亚亚高山草甸地区非越野骑行和徒步的影响。在不同强度的山地自行车骑行(无、25、75、200 和 500 次穿越斜坡、200 次上下斜坡)和徒步(200 和 500 次穿越斜坡)后,立即和两周后测量了植被和土壤参数。骑行导致植被高度、覆盖度和物种丰富度降低,物种组成发生变化,枯枝落叶和土壤紧实度增加。在中等坡度上下骑行比在斜坡上穿越骑行的影响更大。徒步也会影响植被高度、覆盖度和组成。山地自行车骑行造成的破坏比徒步大,但仅在高使用(500 次)情况下如此。需要进行包括其他生态系统、地形、骑行方式和天气条件在内的进一步研究,但在本研究测试的条件下,徒步和山地自行车骑行在环境影响方面似乎相似。