Ballantyne Mark, Pickering Catherine Marina
Environmental Futures Research Institute, Griffith University, Gold Coast, Queensland 4222, Australia.
Environmental Futures Research Institute, Griffith University, Gold Coast, Queensland 4222, Australia.
J Environ Manage. 2015 Dec 1;164:53-64. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2015.08.032. Epub 2015 Sep 3.
Reflecting the popularity of nature-based activities such as hiking and mountain biking, there are thousands of kilometres of recreational trails worldwide traversing a range of natural areas. These trails have environmental impacts on soils and vegetation, but where has there been research, what impacts have been found and how were they measured? Using a systematic quantitative literature review methodology, we assessed the impacts of trails on vegetation and soils, highlighting what is known, but also key knowledge gaps. Of the 59 original research papers identified on this topic that have been published in English language peer-reviewed academic journals, most were for research conducted in protected areas (71%), with few from developing countries (17%) or threatened ecosystems (14%). The research is concentrated in a few habitats and biodiversity hotspots, mainly temperate woodland, alpine grassland and Mediterranean habitats, often in the USA (32%) or Australia (20%). Most examined formal trails, with just 15% examining informal trails and 11% assessing both types. Nearly all papers report the results of observational surveys (90%), collecting quantitative data (66%) with 24% using geographic information systems. There was an emphasis on assessing trail impacts at a local scale, either on the trail itself and/or over short gradients away from the trail edge. Many assessed changes in composition and to some degree, structure, of vegetation and soils with the most common impacts documented including reduced vegetation cover, changes in plant species composition, trail widening, soil loss and soil compaction. There were 14 papers assessing how these local impacts can accumulate at the landscape scale. Few papers assessed differences in impacts among trails (7 papers), changes in impacts over time (4), species-specific responses (3) and only one assessed effects on plant community functioning. This review provides evidence that there are key research gaps including assessing informal trails, comparing trail types, landscape and temporal scale impacts, functional responses and impacts on threatened ecosystems/species. A more diverse geographic spread of research is also required including in regions experiencing rapid growth in tourism and recreation.
鉴于徒步旅行和山地自行车等以自然为基础的活动广受欢迎,全球有数以千计公里的休闲步道贯穿一系列自然区域。这些步道对土壤和植被有环境影响,但相关研究开展于何处、发现了哪些影响以及如何进行测量?我们采用系统的定量文献综述方法,评估了步道对植被和土壤的影响,突出了已知内容以及关键的知识空白。在已发表于英文同行评审学术期刊上的59篇关于该主题的原始研究论文中,大多数是针对保护区开展的研究(71%),来自发展中国家的研究较少(17%),来自受威胁生态系统的研究也较少(14%)。研究集中在少数栖息地和生物多样性热点地区,主要是温带林地、高山草原和地中海栖息地,且经常在美国(32%)或澳大利亚(20%)。大多数研究的是正式步道,仅有15%研究非正式步道,11%同时评估了两种类型的步道。几乎所有论文都报告了观测调查的结果(90%),66%收集了定量数据,24%使用了地理信息系统。研究重点是在局部尺度评估步道影响,无论是在步道本身还是在远离步道边缘的短梯度范围内。许多研究评估了植被和土壤组成以及在一定程度上结构的变化,记录的最常见影响包括植被覆盖减少、植物物种组成变化、步道拓宽、土壤流失和土壤压实。有14篇论文评估了这些局部影响如何在景观尺度上累积。很少有论文评估不同步道之间影响的差异(7篇论文)、影响随时间的变化(4篇)、物种特异性反应(3篇),只有1篇评估了对植物群落功能的影响。本综述表明存在关键的研究空白,包括评估非正式步道、比较步道类型、景观和时间尺度影响、功能反应以及对受威胁生态系统/物种的影响。还需要更广泛的地理分布研究,包括在旅游和休闲快速增长的地区。