• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

继续使用标准日法。

Continued use of the Standard Days Method.

作者信息

Sinai Irit, Lundgren Rebecka I, Gribble James N

机构信息

Institute for Reproductive Health, Georgetown University, Washington, DC., USA.

出版信息

J Fam Plann Reprod Health Care. 2012 Jul;38(3):150-6. doi: 10.1136/jfprhc-2011-100097. Epub 2011 Aug 20.

DOI:10.1136/jfprhc-2011-100097
PMID:21857029
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To examine the long-term effectiveness and continuation of the Standard Days Method (SDM)®, a fertility awareness-based method of family planning that identifies Days 8-19 (inclusive) of the cycle as the fertile window. On these days users avoid unprotected sexual intercourse to prevent pregnancy. The method works best for women with cycles that are usually in the range of 26-32 days, which is an important reason for method discontinuation in the first year of use. The authors determine if this continues to be an issue in the second and third years of method use.

METHODS

Participants in an earlier efficacy study (478 women in three countries) and method introduction studies (1181 women in four countries) were followed for 2 years beyond the original 1-year study period, to determine their continued use of the method, intended and unintended pregnancies, and reasons for discontinuation. Life-tables were used to approximate typical use pregnancy rates.

RESULTS

The method continues to be effective in the second and third years of use, and compares favourably to other user-directed family planning methods. Women with no more than two cycles outside the 26-32-day range within a year are likely to continue having cycles within this range.

CONCLUSIONS

Women who complete the first year of SDM use are likely to continue to be able to use the method successfully and effectively. The method presents a viable longer-term option for women who prefer this approach to family planning.

摘要

目的

研究标准日法(SDM)®的长期有效性及持续使用情况。标准日法是一种基于生育意识的计划生育方法,将月经周期的第8 - 19天(含)确定为易孕期。在这些日子里,使用者需避免无保护性行为以防止怀孕。该方法对月经周期通常在26 - 32天范围内的女性效果最佳,这也是在使用第一年停用该方法的一个重要原因。作者探究在使用该方法的第二和第三年这是否仍是一个问题。

方法

对早期疗效研究(三个国家的47名女性)和方法引入研究(四个国家的1181名女性)的参与者在最初1年研究期之后又随访了2年,以确定她们对该方法的持续使用情况、意外怀孕和非意愿怀孕情况以及停用原因。使用生命表来估算典型使用情况下的怀孕率。

结果

在使用的第二和第三年该方法仍然有效,并且与其他自主选择的计划生育方法相比具有优势。一年内月经周期超出26 - 32天范围不超过两个周期的女性,其月经周期仍有可能继续保持在这个范围内。

结论

完成标准日法第一年使用的女性很可能能够继续成功且有效地使用该方法。对于偏好这种计划生育方法的女性而言,该方法是一种可行的长期选择。

相似文献

1
Continued use of the Standard Days Method.继续使用标准日法。
J Fam Plann Reprod Health Care. 2012 Jul;38(3):150-6. doi: 10.1136/jfprhc-2011-100097. Epub 2011 Aug 20.
2
The Standard Days Method: an addition to the arsenal of family planning method choice in Ethiopia.标准日法:埃塞俄比亚计划生育方法选择手段的补充
J Fam Plann Reprod Health Care. 2012 Jul;38(3):157-66. doi: 10.1136/jfprhc-2011-100116. Epub 2011 Aug 20.
3
Being strategic about contraceptive introduction: the experience of the Standard Days Method.战略性引入避孕方法:标准日法的经验
Contraception. 2008 Mar;77(3):147-54. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2007.11.001.
4
New approaches to fertility awareness-based methods: incorporating the Standard Days and TwoDay Methods into practice.基于生育意识方法的新途径:将标准日法和两日法应用于实践。
J Midwifery Womens Health. 2006 Nov-Dec;51(6):471-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jmwh.2006.05.002.
5
Efficacy of the new TwoDay Method of family planning.新型计划生育两日法的功效
Fertil Steril. 2004 Oct;82(4):885-92. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2004.03.040.
6
Comparison of Abstinence and Coital Frequency Between 2 Natural Methods of Family Planning.两种自然计划生育方法的禁欲情况与性交频率比较
J Midwifery Womens Health. 2014 Sep-Oct;59(5):528-32. doi: 10.1111/jmwh.12216.
7
Effectiveness of an Online Natural Family Planning Program for Breastfeeding Women.一项针对哺乳期妇女的在线自然计划生育项目的有效性。
J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 2017 Jul-Aug;46(4):e129-e137. doi: 10.1016/j.jogn.2017.03.010. Epub 2017 Jun 3.
8
Fertility awareness-based methods of family planning: predictors of correct use.
Int Fam Plan Perspect. 2006 Jun;32(2):94-100. doi: 10.1363/3209406.
9
Personal hormone monitoring for contraception.用于避孕的个人激素监测。
Br J Fam Plann. 1999 Jan;24(4):128-34.
10
Further analysis of the theoretical effectiveness of the TwoDay method of family planning.对计划生育两日法理论有效性的进一步分析。
Contraception. 2001 Sep;64(3):149-53. doi: 10.1016/s0010-7824(01)00251-7.

引用本文的文献

1
Assessing the Competency and Acceptability of Community Health Worker Provision of Standard Days Method® in Family Planning Services in Gisagara District, Rwanda.评估社区卫生工作者在卢旺达吉沙垃地区计划生育服务中提供标准日方法®的能力和可接受性。
Stud Fam Plann. 2018 Jun;49(2):159-170. doi: 10.1111/sifp.12059. Epub 2018 May 21.
2
Couple Beads: An integrated method of natural family planning.夫妻珠:一种自然计划生育的综合方法。
Linacre Q. 2016 Feb;83(1):69-82. doi: 10.1080/00243639.2015.1133018.
3
Moving towards the goals of FP2020 - classifying contraceptives.
迈向2020年计划生育目标——对避孕药具进行分类
Contraception. 2016 Oct;94(4):289-94. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2016.05.015. Epub 2016 Jun 7.
4
Systems approach to monitoring and evaluation guides scale up of the Standard Days Method of family planning in Rwanda.系统监测与评估方法助力卢旺达扩大计划生育标准天数法的推广规模。
Glob Health Sci Pract. 2014 May 4;2(2):234-44. doi: 10.9745/GHSP-D-13-00165. eCollection 2014 May.
5
Assessing the effect of introducing a new method into family planning programs in India, Peru, and Rwanda.评估在印度、秘鲁和卢旺达的计划生育项目中引入新方法的效果。
Reprod Health. 2012 Sep 1;9:17. doi: 10.1186/1742-4755-9-17.
6
The role of the Standard Days Method in modern family planning services in developing countries.标准日法在发展中国家现代计划生育服务中的作用。
Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 2012 Aug;17(4):254-9. doi: 10.3109/13625187.2012.677077. Epub 2012 Jun 10.