Suppr超能文献

继续使用标准日法。

Continued use of the Standard Days Method.

作者信息

Sinai Irit, Lundgren Rebecka I, Gribble James N

机构信息

Institute for Reproductive Health, Georgetown University, Washington, DC., USA.

出版信息

J Fam Plann Reprod Health Care. 2012 Jul;38(3):150-6. doi: 10.1136/jfprhc-2011-100097. Epub 2011 Aug 20.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To examine the long-term effectiveness and continuation of the Standard Days Method (SDM)®, a fertility awareness-based method of family planning that identifies Days 8-19 (inclusive) of the cycle as the fertile window. On these days users avoid unprotected sexual intercourse to prevent pregnancy. The method works best for women with cycles that are usually in the range of 26-32 days, which is an important reason for method discontinuation in the first year of use. The authors determine if this continues to be an issue in the second and third years of method use.

METHODS

Participants in an earlier efficacy study (478 women in three countries) and method introduction studies (1181 women in four countries) were followed for 2 years beyond the original 1-year study period, to determine their continued use of the method, intended and unintended pregnancies, and reasons for discontinuation. Life-tables were used to approximate typical use pregnancy rates.

RESULTS

The method continues to be effective in the second and third years of use, and compares favourably to other user-directed family planning methods. Women with no more than two cycles outside the 26-32-day range within a year are likely to continue having cycles within this range.

CONCLUSIONS

Women who complete the first year of SDM use are likely to continue to be able to use the method successfully and effectively. The method presents a viable longer-term option for women who prefer this approach to family planning.

摘要

目的

研究标准日法(SDM)®的长期有效性及持续使用情况。标准日法是一种基于生育意识的计划生育方法,将月经周期的第8 - 19天(含)确定为易孕期。在这些日子里,使用者需避免无保护性行为以防止怀孕。该方法对月经周期通常在26 - 32天范围内的女性效果最佳,这也是在使用第一年停用该方法的一个重要原因。作者探究在使用该方法的第二和第三年这是否仍是一个问题。

方法

对早期疗效研究(三个国家的47名女性)和方法引入研究(四个国家的1181名女性)的参与者在最初1年研究期之后又随访了2年,以确定她们对该方法的持续使用情况、意外怀孕和非意愿怀孕情况以及停用原因。使用生命表来估算典型使用情况下的怀孕率。

结果

在使用的第二和第三年该方法仍然有效,并且与其他自主选择的计划生育方法相比具有优势。一年内月经周期超出26 - 32天范围不超过两个周期的女性,其月经周期仍有可能继续保持在这个范围内。

结论

完成标准日法第一年使用的女性很可能能够继续成功且有效地使用该方法。对于偏好这种计划生育方法的女性而言,该方法是一种可行的长期选择。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验