Kawu A A, Olawepo A, Salami A O O
Department of Orthopaedics, University of Abuja Teaching Hospital, Gwagwalada, Abuja, Nigeria.
Niger J Clin Pract. 2011 Apr-Jun;14(2):219-22. doi: 10.4103/1119-3077.84021.
There is a paucity of information on treatment options and outcome of treatment of patients that have MRI findings of FJA presenting with low back pain in the developing country. This prospective cohort study conducted mainly in the University of Abuja Teaching Hospital Gwagwalada, Abuja Nigeria is to compare the short-term clinical outcome between two groups, one having undergone facet joints infiltration (FJI) and the other physiotherapy for facet joint arthropathy (FJA).
All patients with clinical lower back pain (LBP) and MRI features of FJA were recruited into this prospective study randomly. All the FJI patients had depot methylprednisolone and the physiotherapy patients had McKenzie regimen. Outcome questionnaires comprising Oswentry disability index scores (ODI), visual analogue scores (VAS), and patient satisfaction scores (PSS) were completed at all clinic visits. Follow-up was for 6 months for both groups. The results were analyzed using SPSS 17.0.
There were 10 FJI patients and 8 physiotherapy patients (1.25: 1). The outcome scores comprised the following ODI, VAS, and PSS. The FJI group had a better score compared to the physiotherapy group at short-term evaluation and this difference was statistically significant. The female patients in both groups fare better compared to the male counterparts.
FJI offered added benefit over physiotherapy in LBPs diagnosed with FJA. Patients with FJI have a significant reduction in pain symptom than the patients in the physiotherapy group. Though majority of the patients reported satisfactory outcome, the FJI patients group had a better outcome.
在发展中国家,关于腰椎小关节关节炎(FJA)伴有下腰痛且有MRI表现的患者的治疗选择和治疗结果的信息匮乏。这项主要在尼日利亚阿布贾瓜瓜拉达的阿布贾大学教学医院进行的前瞻性队列研究,旨在比较两组的短期临床结果,一组接受了小关节注射(FJI),另一组接受了针对小关节病(FJA)的物理治疗。
所有有临床下腰痛(LBP)且具有FJA的MRI特征的患者被随机纳入这项前瞻性研究。所有接受FJI的患者都使用了长效甲基强的松龙,接受物理治疗的患者采用麦肯齐疗法。在所有门诊就诊时均完成包括奥斯本特残疾指数评分(ODI)、视觉模拟评分(VAS)和患者满意度评分(PSS)的结果问卷。两组均随访6个月。使用SPSS 17.0对结果进行分析。
有10例接受FJI的患者和8例接受物理治疗的患者(比例为1.25:1)。结果评分包括以下ODI、VAS和PSS。在短期评估中,FJI组的评分优于物理治疗组,且这种差异具有统计学意义。两组中的女性患者比男性患者情况更好。
在诊断为FJA的下腰痛患者中,FJI比物理治疗更具优势。与物理治疗组的患者相比,接受FJI的患者疼痛症状明显减轻。尽管大多数患者报告结果令人满意,但FJI患者组的结果更好。