Suppr超能文献

用于治疗腰痛的关节内小关节注射:一项系统评价

Intra-articular facet joint injections for low back pain: a systematic review.

作者信息

Vekaria Rajni, Bhatt Ree'thee, Ellard David R, Henschke Nicholas, Underwood Martin, Sandhu Harbinder

机构信息

Warwick Medical School, The University of Warwick, Gibbet Hill Road, Coventry, CV4 7AL, UK.

Warwick Clinical Trials Unit, The University of Warwick, Gibbet Hill Road, Coventry, CV4 7AL, UK.

出版信息

Eur Spine J. 2016 Apr;25(4):1266-81. doi: 10.1007/s00586-016-4455-y. Epub 2016 Feb 23.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Evidence supporting the use of therapeutic intra-articular facet joint injections for patients with suspected facet joint pain is sparse. A systematic review including a narrative synthesis was carried out to determine if intra-articular facet joint injections with active drug are more effective in reducing back pain and back pain-related disability than a sham procedure or a placebo/inactive injection. Secondly, to determine if intra-articular facet joint injections with active drug or placebo/inactive injection are more effective in reducing back pain and back pain-related disability than conservative treatment.

METHODS

Medline, EMBASE, CINAHL, CENTRAL, Index to Chiropractic Literature and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched from inception through April 2015. Data were screened and single extraction with independent verification and risk of bias assessment was performed.

RESULTS

A total of 391 records were screened, and six trials were included. The trials included were small (range 18-109 participants) and overall in terms of pain and disability outcomes most were inconclusive. Only two of the trials report any significant between-group differences in pain (mean difference -1.0, 95% CI -2.0 to -0.1) and (p = 0.032) or disability (mean difference -3.0, 95% CI -6.2 to 0.2) and (p = 0.013) outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

The studies found here were clinically diverse and precluded any meta-analysis. A number of methodological issues were identified. The positive results, whilst interpreted with caution, do suggest that there is a need for further high-quality work in this area.

摘要

目的

支持对疑似小关节疼痛患者使用治疗性关节内小关节注射的证据很少。进行了一项包括叙述性综合分析的系统评价,以确定使用活性药物的关节内小关节注射在减轻背痛和与背痛相关的残疾方面是否比假手术或安慰剂/非活性注射更有效。其次,确定使用活性药物或安慰剂/非活性注射的关节内小关节注射在减轻背痛和与背痛相关的残疾方面是否比保守治疗更有效。

方法

检索了从创刊到2015年4月的Medline、EMBASE、CINAHL、CENTRAL、脊椎按摩疗法文献索引和Cochrane对照试验中央注册库。对数据进行筛选,并进行单份提取,同时进行独立验证和偏倚风险评估。

结果

共筛选了391条记录,纳入了6项试验。纳入的试验规模较小(参与者范围为18 - 109人),总体而言,在疼痛和残疾结局方面,大多数试验结果尚无定论。只有两项试验报告了组间在疼痛(平均差异 -1.0,95%可信区间 -2.0至 -0.1)(p = 0.032)或残疾(平均差异 -3.0,95%可信区间 -6.2至0.2)(p = 0.013)结局方面存在任何显著差异。

结论

此处发现的研究在临床上具有多样性,无法进行任何荟萃分析。确定了一些方法学问题。尽管对阳性结果需谨慎解读,但确实表明该领域需要进一步开展高质量研究。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验