Hoftman Nir, Canales Cecilia, Leduc Matthew, Mahajan Aman
Department of Anesthesiology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Ann Card Anaesth. 2011 Sep-Dec;14(3):183-7. doi: 10.4103/0971-9784.83991.
The efficacy of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) in treating intraoperative hypoxemia during one-lung ventilation (OLV) remains in question given conflicting results of prior studies. This study aims to (1) evaluate the efficacy of PEEP during OLV, (2) assess the utility of preoperative predictors of response to PEEP, and (3) explore optimal intraoperative settings that would maximize the effects of PEEP on oxygenation. Forty-one thoracic surgery patients from a single tertiary care university center were prospectively enrolled in this observational study. After induction of general anesthesia, a double-lumen endotracheal tube was fiberoptically positioned and OLV initiated. Intraoperatively, PEEP = 5 and 10 cm H(2)O were sequentially applied to the ventilated lung during OLV. Arterial oxygenation, cardiovascular performance parameters, and proposed perioperative variables that could predict or enhance response to PEEP were analysed. T-test and χ(2) tests were utilized for continuous and categorical variables, respectively. Multivariate analyses were carried out using a classification tree model of binary recursive partitioning. PEEP improved arterial oxygenation by ≥20% in 29% of patients (n = 12) and failed to do so in 71% (n = 29); however, no cardiovascular impact was noted. Among the proposed clinical predictors, only intraoperative tidal volume per kilogram differed significantly between responders to PEEP and non-responders (mean 6.6 vs. 5.7 ml/kg, P = 0.013); no preoperative variable predicted response to PEEP. A multivariate analysis did not yield a clinically significant model for predicting PEEP responsiveness. PEEP improved oxygenation in a subset of patients; larger, although still protective tidal volumes favored a positive response to PEEP. No preoperative variables, however, could be identified as reliable predictors for PEEP responders.
鉴于先前研究结果相互矛盾,呼气末正压通气(PEEP)在治疗单肺通气(OLV)期间术中低氧血症的疗效仍存在疑问。本研究旨在:(1)评估OLV期间PEEP的疗效;(2)评估术前预测PEEP反应性指标的效用;(3)探索能使PEEP对氧合作用最大化的最佳术中设置。来自一所三级医疗大学中心的41例胸外科手术患者前瞻性纳入本观察性研究。全身麻醉诱导后,经纤维支气管镜定位双腔气管导管并开始OLV。术中,在OLV期间依次对通气肺施加PEEP = 5和10 cmH₂O。分析动脉氧合、心血管性能参数以及可能预测或增强对PEEP反应的围手术期变量。分别对连续变量和分类变量使用t检验和χ²检验。使用二元递归划分的分类树模型进行多变量分析。29%(n = 12)的患者中PEEP使动脉氧合改善≥20%,71%(n = 29)的患者未达到;然而,未观察到对心血管有影响。在提出的临床预测指标中,仅PEEP反应者与无反应者之间每千克体重的术中潮气量有显著差异(平均6.6 vs. 5.7 ml/kg,P = 0.013);无术前变量可预测对PEEP的反应。多变量分析未得出预测PEEP反应性的具有临床意义的模型。PEEP在部分患者中改善了氧合;更大的潮气量(尽管仍为保护性潮气量)有利于对PEEP产生阳性反应。然而,没有术前变量可被确定为PEEP反应者的可靠预测指标。